جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی

جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی

ارزیابی آسیب پذیری ناشی از سیلاب در مواجهه با تغییرات اقلیمی آینده: رویکردی تلفیقی از مدل های CMIP6، یادگیری ماشین و سنجش از دور

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه گردشگری، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
2 گروه ژئومورفولوژی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
3 گروه آب و هواشناسی، دانشکده علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
4 گروه علوم محیطی، دانشکده علوم و فناوری، دانشگاه آتاباسکا، آتاباسکا، آلبرتا، کانادا
چکیده
افزایش فراوانی سیلاب‌ها در پی گرمایش جهانی و مداخلات انسانی، چالشی فزاینده محسوب می‌شود. پژوهش حاضر، تأثیر سناریوهای تغییر اقلیم آینده را بر حساسیت سیلاب‌خیزی حوضه آبریز قره‌سو بررسی می‌کند. هدف اصلی، کمی‌سازی و پهنه‌بندی دقیق خطر سیلاب تحت سناریوهای اقلیمی متنوع است. بدین منظور، از تلفیق الگوریتم‌های یادگیری ماشین، مدل‌های اقلیمی CMIP6 و تکنیک‌های سنجش از دور بهره گرفته شد. مدل اقلیمی MPI-ESM1-2-HR به‌دلیل دقت برتر در میان مدل‌های جهانی، جهت برآورد روندهای بارش تحت مسیرهای اجتماعی-اقتصادی SSP1-2.6، SSP2-4.5 و SSP5-8.5 در دو افق زمانی میانی (۲۰۴۱-۲۰۷۰) و دور (۲۰۷۱-۲۱۰۰) انتخاب گردید. این سناریوها متغیرهای کلیدی نظیر انتشار گازهای گلخانه‌ای، شهرنشینی و تغییر کاربری اراضی را که در تعدیل حساسیت سیلاب مؤثرند، دربرمی‌گیرند. پهنه‌بندی حساسیت با الگوریتم‌های جنگل تصادفی (RF) و ماشین بردار پشتیبان (SVM)، مبتنی بر ۳۲۰ نقطه سیلاب و ۱۶ عامل محیطی و اقلیمی انجام شد. دقت پیش‌بینی مدل‌ها با شاخص سطح زیر منحنی (ROC-AUC) ارزیابی گردید. نتایج حاکی از عملکرد درخشان مدل RF بود؛ به‌طوری‌که این الگوریتم با ثبت AUC معادل ۹۴.۷۵٪ در مرحله اعتبارسنجی و حفظ دقت بالای ۹۰٪ در کلیه افق‌های زمانی و سناریوهای آینده، برتری مطلقی نسبت به مدل SVM از خود نشان داد. این یافته‌ها برای مدیریت ریسک سیلاب حیاتی است
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

©2026 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

Abedi, R., Costache, R., Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H., & Pham, Q. B. (2022). Flash-flood susceptibility mapping based on XGBoost, random forest and boosted regression trees. Geocarto International, 37(19), 5479-5496. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1920636
Arabameri, A., Rezaei, K., Cerdà, A., Conoscenti, C., & Kalantari, Z. (2019). A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran. Science of The Total Environment, 660, 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.021
Arnell, N. W., & Gosling, S. N. (2016). The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale. Climatic Change, 134(3), 387-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1084-5
Asencios, H., Lavado, W., & Sabino, E. (2023). Climate change effects on flooding at Lurin river basin, Peru. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 9028. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-9028
Bahrami, A., & Dastorani, M. (2021). Estimation of flood hydrograph in the ungauged Gharasou watershed using the Gamma synthetic unit hydrograph model. Journal of Hydrogeomorphology, 8(29), 173-186. [in Persian] https://doi.org/10.22034/hyd.2022.49180.1614
Bai, M., Tahmasebipour, N., Zeinivand, H., Sadoddin, A. & Kaheh, M. (2024). Investigating the Two-Dimensional HEC-RAS Model Capability for Flood Risk Mapping in the Qarachai River in Ramian, Golestan Province. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 12(4), 187–203. [in Persian]  https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2022.75557.1185
Mosavi, A., Ozturk, P., & Chau, K. W. (2018). Flood prediction using machine learning models: Literature review. Water, 10(11), 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111536
Band, S. S., Janizadeh, S., Chandra Pal, S., Saha, A., Chakrabortty, R., Melesse, A. M., & Mosavi, A. (2020). Flash flood susceptibility modeling using new approaches of hybrid and ensemble tree-based machine learning algorithms. Remote Sensing, 12(21), 3568. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213568
Behzadi, F., Javadi, S., Hafezi, S., Vasheghani Farahani, E., & Golmohammadi, G. (2024). Flood risk projection in Iran using CMIP6 models and frequency analysis of precipitation. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 38, 4843–4861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-024-02835-8
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Chen, G., Hou, J., Liu, Y., Xue, S., Wu, H., Wang, T., ... & Yang, S. (2024). Urban inundation rapid prediction method based on multi-machine learning algorithm and rain pattern analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 633, 131059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131059
Choubin, B., Moradi, E., Golshan, M., Adamowski, J., Sajedi-Hosseini, F., & Mosavi, A. (2019). An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines. Science of The Total Environment, 651, 2087–2096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.064
Copernicus Climate Change Service, Climate Data Store. (2021). CMIP6 climate projections. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.c866074c
Deng, Z., Wang, Z., Wu, X., Lai, C., & Liu, W. (2023). Effect difference of climate change and urbanization on extreme precipitation over the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Atmospheric Research, 282, 106514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106514
Gholami, F., Nemati, A., Li, Y., & Zhang, J. (2022). Calculation of runoff computation cost and sensitivity analysis of topological attributes. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 26, 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2022.100714
Hengl, T., Nussbaum, M., Wright, M. N., Heuvelink, G. B., & Gräler, B. (2018). Random forest as a generic framework for predictive modeling of spatial and spatio-temporal variables. Peer Journal, 6, e5518. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5518
Heo, J.-H., Ahn, H., Shin, J.-Y., Kjeldsen, T. R., & Jeong, C. (2019). Probability distributions for a quantile mapping technique for a bias correction of precipitation data: A case study to precipitation data under climate change. Water, 11(7), 1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071475
Hooshyaripor, F., Faraji-Ashkavar, S., Koohyian, F., Tang, Q., & Noori, R. (2020). Annual flood damage influenced by El Niño in the Kan River basin, Iran. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 20(10), 2739-2751. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2739-2020
Hooshyaripor, F., Faraji-Ashkavar, S., Koohyian, F., Tang, Q., & Noori, R. (2024). Quantifying the impact of future climate change on flood susceptibility: An integration of CMIP6 models, machine learning, and remote sensing. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(9), 04024035. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6344
Iosub, M., Minea, G., Chelariu, O. E., & Urzica, A. (2020). Assessment of flash flood susceptibility potential in Bârlad river catchment using bivariate statistics and machine learning approaches. Water, 12(12), 3465. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123465
Janizadeh, S., Kim, D., Jun, C., Bateni, S. M., Pandey, M., & Mishra, V. N. (2024). Impact of climate change on future flood susceptibility projections under shared socioeconomic pathway scenarios in South Asia using artificial intelligence algorithms. Journal of Environmental Management, 124785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.124785
Jiang, D., Hu, D., Tian, Z., & Lang, X. (2020). Differences between CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate over China and the East Asian monsoon. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 37(10), 1102–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-2034-y
Jiang, Z., Yang, S., Liu, Z., Xu, Y., Xiong, Y., Qi, S., … & Xu, T. (2022). Coupling machine learning and weather forecast to predict farmland flood disaster: A case study in Yangtze River basin. Environmental Modelling & Software, 155, 105436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105436
Kazemi, M., Mohammadi, F., Nafooti, M. H., Behvar, K., & Kariminejad, N. (2024). Flood susceptibility mapping using machine learning and remote sensing data in the Southern Karun Basin, Iran. Applied Geomatics, 16(3), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-024-00582-7
Khodaei, H., Nasiri Saleh, F., Nobakht Dalir, A., & Zarei, E. (2025). Future flood susceptibility mapping under climate and land use change. Scientific Reports, 15, 12394. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12394-x
Khosravi, K., Pham, B. T., Chapi, K., Shirzadi, A., Shahabi, H., Revhaug, I., … & Bui, D. T. (2018). A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, northern Iran. Science of The Total Environment, 627, 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.266
Khosravi, K., Shahabi, H., Pham, B. T., Adamowski, J., Shirzadi, A., Pradhan, B., … & Ho, H. L. (2019). A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using multi-criteria decision-making analysis and machine learning methods. Journal of Hydrology, 573, 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073
Li, X., & Li, Z. (2023). Evaluation of bias correction techniques for generating high-resolution daily temperature projections from CMIP6 models. Climate Dynamics, 61(7–8), 3893–3910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06778-8
Liu, J., Wang, J., Xiong, J., Cheng, W., Li, Y., Cao, Y., ... & Yang, G. (2022). Assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using support vector machine, logistic regression and their ensemble techniques in the Belt and Road region. Geocarto International, 37(25), 9817-9846. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2025918
Luu, C., Von Meding, J., & Kanjanabootra, S. (2021). Spatial flood risk assessment using multi-criteria decision analysis and remote sensing data in Quang Binh province, Vietnam. Water, 13(12), 1655. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13121655
Maghsood, F. F., Moradi, H., Massah Bavani, A. R., Panahi, M., Berndtsson, R., & Hashemi, H. (2019). Climate change impact on flood frequency and source area in northern Iran under CMIP5 scenarios. Water, 11(2), 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020273
McGrath, H. (2026). Multi-event machine learning for annual flood susceptibility prediction across Canada. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XI-M-1-2026, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-XI-M-1-2026-21-2026
Mohanty, M. P., & Simonovic, S. P. (2021). Changes in floodplain regimes over Canada due to climate change impacts: Observations from CMIP6 models. Science of The Total Environment, 792, 148323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148323
Mountrakis, G., Im, J., & Ogole, C. (2011). Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001
Muis, S., Güneralp, B., Jongman, B., Aerts, J. C. J. H., & Ward, P. J. (2015). Flood risk and adaptation strategies under climate change and urban expansion: A probabilistic analysis using global data. Science of the Total Environment, 538, 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.068
Nachappa, T. G., Piralilou, S. T., Gholamnia, K., Ghorbanzadeh, O., Rahmati, O., & Blaschke, T. (2020). Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125275
Nguyen, H. D., Nguyen, Q. H., Du, Q. V. V., Nguyen, T. H. T., Nguyen, T. G., & Bui, Q. T. (2022). A novel combination of Deep Neural Network and Manta Ray Foraging Optimization for flood susceptibility mapping in Quang Ngai province, Vietnam. Geocarto International, 37(25), 7531-7555. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1975832
Pastén-Zapata, E., Jones, J. M., Moggridge, H., & Widmann, M. (2020). Evaluation of the performance of Euro-CORDEX Regional Climate Models for assessing hydrological climate change impacts in Great Britain: A comparison of different spatial resolutions and quantile mapping bias correction methods. Journal of Hydrology, 584, 124653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124653
Rathjens, H., Bieger, K., Srinivasan, R., Chaubey, I., & Arnold, J. (2016). CMhyd user manual: Documentation for preparing simulated climate change data for hydrologic impact studies. USDA Agricultural Research Service.
Reshmidevi, T., Kumar, D. N., Mehrotra, R., & Sharma, A. (2018). Estimation of the climate change impact on a catchment water balance using an ensemble of GCMs. Journal of Hydrology, 556, 1192-1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.016
Sadler, J. M., Goodall, J. L., Morsy, M. M., & Spencer, K. (2018). Modeling urban coastal flood severity from crowd-sourced flood reports using Poisson regression and random forest. Water Resources Research, 54(11), 9037–9052. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023403
Seleem, O., Ayzel, G., de Souza, A. C. T., Bronstert, A., & Heistermann, M. (2022). Towards urban flood susceptibility mapping using data-driven models in Berlin, Germany. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 13(1), 1640–1662. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2097131
Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H., Valavi, R., Shahabi, H., Chapi, K., & Shirzadi, A. (2018). Novel forecasting approaches using combination of machine learning and statistical models for flood susceptibility mapping. Journal of Environmental Management, 217, 1–11. [in Persian] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.089
Szczurek, A., Gonstał, D., & Maciejewska, M. (2023). The gas sensing drone with the lowered and lifted measurement platform. Sensors, 23(3), 1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031253
Tang, S., Gleckler, P., Xie, S., Lee, J., Ahn, M.-S., Covey, C., & Zhang, C. (2021). Evaluating the diurnal and semidiurnal cycle of precipitation in CMIP6 models using satellite-and ground-based observations. Journal of Climate, 34(8), 3189–3210. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0639.1
Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., Mansor, S., & Ahmad, N. (2015). Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. Catena, 125, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.017
Teutschbein, C., & Seibert, J. (2012). Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods. Journal of Hydrology, 456, 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.052
Ullah, K., Wang, Y., Xi, C., Du, B., Li, P., Liu, T., ... & Hamed, M. M. (2025). Multi-Scenario flood susceptibility projections in the Eastern Hindu kush: integrating machine Learning, CMIP6, and land use change. Earth Systems and Environment, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-025-00793-x
Usta, D. F. B., Teymouri, M., & Chatterjee, U. (2022). Assessment of temperature changes over Iran during the twenty-first century using CMIP6 models under SSP1-26, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 15(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09709-9
Wang, J., Sanderson, J., Iqbal, S., & Woo, W. L. (2025). Accelerated and interpretable flood susceptibility mapping through explainable deep learning with hydrological prior knowledge. Remote Sensing, 17(9), 1540. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17091540
Wang, Q., Xu, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Xiang, J., Xu, Y., & Wang, J. (2020). Individual and combined impacts of future land-use and climate conditions on extreme hydrological events in a representative basin of the Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmospheric Research, 236, 104805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104805
Wang, X., Wang, J., Wang, X., & Yu, C. (2022). A pseudo-spectral Fourier collocation method for inhomogeneous elliptical inclusions with partial differential equations. Mathematics, 10(3), 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030296
Wu, Y., Liu, Y., Zhou, W., & Zhang, J. (2022). The mid-Holocene East Asian summer monsoon simulated by PMIP4-CMIP6 and PMIP3-CMIP5: Model uncertainty and its possible sources. Global and Planetary Change, 219, 103986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2022.103986
Xiang, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Impact of climate change on the hydrological regime of the Yarkant River Basin, China: An assessment using three SSP scenarios of CMIP6 GCMs. Remote Sensing, 14(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14010115
Yazdandoost, F., Moradian, S., Izadi, A., & AghaKouchak, A. (2021). Evaluation of CMIP6 precipitation simulations across different climatic zones: Uncertainty and model intercomparison. Atmospheric Research, 250, 105369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105369
Yousefi, S., Pourghasemi, H. R., Emami, S. N., Rahmati, O., Tavangar, S., Pouyan, S., … & Nekoeimehr, M. (2020). Assessing the susceptibility of schools to flood events in Iran. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75291-3
Zamani, Y., Hashemi Monfared, S. A., & Hamidianpour, M. (2020). A comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 projections for precipitation to observational data: The case of Northeastern Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 142(3), 1613-1623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03406-x
Zangeneh Asadi, M. A., Goli Mokhtari, L. & Namitabar, M. (2026). Flood Risk Assessment, Prediction and Zonation in the Kashafrud Basin Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 15(2), 63–92. [in Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2026.96351.1624
Zarrin, A., & Dadashi-Roudbari, A. (2021). Projection of future extreme precipitation in Iran based on CMIP6 multi-model ensemble. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 144, 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03568-2
Zarrin, A., & Dadashi-Roudbari, A. (2024). Assessment of mean precipitation and precipitation extremes in Iran as simulated by dynamically downscaled RegCM4. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, 106, 101452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2024.101452
Zarrin, A., Dadashi-Roudbari, A., & Hassani, S. (2022). Future changes in precipitation extremes over Iran: Insight from a CMIP6 bias-corrected multi-model ensemble. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 179(1), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-021-02904-x
Zhao, G., Pang, B., Xu, Z., Peng, D., & Xu, L. (2019). Assessment of urban flood susceptibility using semi-supervised machine learning model. Science of The Total Environment, 659, 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.217
Zhu, Y. Y., & Yang, S. (2020). Evaluation of CMIP6 for historical temperature and precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau and its comparison with CMIP5. Advances in Climate Change Research, 11(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2020.08.001
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
نام را وارد کنید.
نشانی پست الکترونیکی را به درستی وارد کنید.
وابستگی سازمانی را به درستی وارد کنید.
توضیحات را وارد کنید (حداقل 50 حرف)
CAPTCHA Image
شناسه امنیتی را به درستی وارد کنید.

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از 18 مهر 1405

  • تاریخ دریافت 03 شهریور 1405
  • تاریخ بازنگری 16 مهر 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش 18 مهر 1405
  • تاریخ انتشار 18 مهر 1405