Resilience Assessment of Physical Urban Areas against Earthquake: The Case of old neighborhoods in Bushehr)

Document Type : مقاله پژوهشی

Authors

• Rasoul Heidari
• Younes Gholami
• Zahra Salimi

University of Kashan

10.22067/geo.v6i4.57852

Abstract

1. Introduction
Communities around the world are increasingly affected by disasters caused by natural hazards, conflicts and humanitarian emergencies or man created disasters. These disasters often happen in unexpected forms, intensity and places which, in practice, makes any prevention impossible. Many people around the world lose their life because of the natural disasters, while the survivors will remember these bitter experiences. In this sense, our country is among the ten vulnerable countries in the world. During the past 90 years, 12,000 people in the country have lost their lives as a result of disasters and the highest number of casualties (76 percent) has been caused by earthquake. The old areas of the city are vulnerable places. On the one hand, in terms of environmental hazards, specially earthquake, and functional, environmental, social and economic abnormalities on the other hand; and requires detailed, comprehensive, informed and planned intervention to organize them.Increasing the Resilience of cities against natural disasters, especially earthquake, is effective in reducing losses and in the recovery period of the communities. Physical Resilience is one of the influencing factors in the resilience of communities, through which influencing physical and geographical features of societies can be evaluated during disasters. Bushehr is a seismic area, because it is located in the Zagros region, on the edge of Zagros; and also Zagros fault passes Bushehr and it is near to Borazjan. There are some faults which are active and sometimes cause damage. There are some areas in the old regions of Bushehr with high vulnerability against natural disasters (particularly earthquake) which lead to increased vulnerability of their residents when catastrophe occurs. Low quality of the buildings leads to little Resilience against natural disasters, which increases the vulnerability of these areas. In fact this question is posed: how are the physical sub-criteria in old areas of Bushehr? As the old areas of Bushehr are vulnerable, Resilience is a factor in risk reduction and enhancing capacity in these areas. This study aims to identify effective factors in physical Resilience, and to quantify and compare physical sub-criteria in Resilience factor in the old areas of Bushehr.
2. Material and Methods
This study is a descriptive-analytic one and its data collection tool was a questionnaire. Here, first the conception of Resilience according to the library studies (articles and books) and then physical indicators are introduced. The characteristics of this study are: availability, Resilience, quality of the buildings, and outdoor areas. Cochran formula was used to determine the sample size. 381 questionnaires, consisting of general and specific Likert-scale questions, were handed out among the residents of these areas. The reliability was calculated by Cronbach’s alpha and it was .81 which is high. To analyze the information related to resiliency of old areas, structural equation modeling and statistical analysis methods were used. They were calculated by AMOS software. To get the required map, GIS software was applied.
3. The Scope of the Study
Bushehr is in the south of Iran. Its neighboring provinces on the north are Khozestan and parts of Kuhgiloye & Buierahmad. It is a coastal city on the north and east of the Persian Gulf, and its eastern neighboring province is Fars. It has a 625 kilometer water border with the Persian Gulf. Its population in 1390 census was over 195,222 (General census of population and housing, 1390). The total area in legal lands is 8289 hectares, 1880 hectares of which is urban area. The rest of the land is for metropolis applications (City planning consulting engineers, 1383). Bushehr is about 25359 square kilometers which contains 5.1 percent of the country and is the seventeenth big province in our country. Its population includes people in old areas of Dehdashti, Kutis, Behbahanis, Shanbadi and old neighborhoods of Aliabad, and Jafari. In addition to local residents in the old areas, there are also Afghan refugees.
4. Results and Discussion
To examine the hypothesis, the status of physical Resilience in old areas of Bushehr was investigated based on the results of structural equation modeling analysis. Regression analysis of most physical indicators showed a fairly appropriate significant level and also the ratio of critical point and standard error were low. It was shown that the quality of buildings had the most significant effect on physical Resilience against earthquake, among other physical indicators of old areas in Bushehr. According to the results, infrastructure Resilience indicator had the strongest effect on physical Resilience (75 percent). Therefore, the above mentioned hypothesis was rejected.
5. Conclusion
Physical Resilience is one of the effective factors in the resilience of societies, through which the status of the societies in physical and geographical aspects can be evaluated during disasters. The method used in this study was descriptive analytic approach; therefore, library studies and field surveys were utilized. The population of this study was residents of old areas in Bushehr. 381 questionnaires were handed out in these areas and the variables were analyzed through SPSS and AMOS software. The required maps were obtained through GIS software. It was hypothesized that among the physical indicators of old areas in Bushehr, the quality of buildings has the greatest effect on physical Resilience against earthquake. However, the results showed that infrastructure Resilience indicator had the greatest effect (75 percent). The results showed that the status of the Resilience in old areas of Bushehr is not good in terms of physical indicators.
To increase the Resilience in these old areas, the following points are recommended:
Identifying the scope and intensity of inherent challenges which make our city vulnerable to natural disasters
Identifying a set of small pieces of lands in old areas in order to make parks, to increase the access to open areas
Identifying some big parks in the city in order to create central rescue stations and to equip them
Widening the narrow pathways to prevent increasing urban density along the narrow pathways
Applying rules for retrofitting old buildings and increasing the safety of new buildings

Keywords

• Bushehr
• Old area
• Physical resilience
• Structural equation modeling
• Vulnerability

---

References

پریور و همکاران؛ 1391. بسط راهبردهای پایداری اکولوژیک برای افزایش تاب‌آوری محیط زیست شهری (نمونه موردی: مناطق 1 و 3 شهرداری تهران). مجلۀ محیط‌شناسی، سال سی و نهم. شمارۀ 1.صفحات 132-123.

پورمحمدی، محمدرضا؛ مصیب زاده، علی؛ 1387. آسیب‌پذیری شهرهای ایران در برابر زلزله و نقش مشارکت محله‌ای در امدادرسانی آن‌ها. مجله جغرافیا و توسعه، شماره 12. صفحات 144-117.

رضایی و همکاران؛ 1394. سنجش و ارزیابی میزان تاب‌آوری کالبدی اجتماع‌های شهری در برابر زلزله (نمونه موردی: محله‌های شهر تهران). مجله پژوهش‌های انسانی، دورۀ 47، شمارۀ 4. صفحات 45-19.

رضایی، محمدرضا؛ 1392. ارزیابی تاب‌آوری اقتصادی و نهادی جوامع شهری در برابر سوانح طبیعی (نمونه موردی: زلزلۀ محله‌های شهر تهران). فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی مدیریت بحران، شماره 3. صفحات 38-28.

رفیعیان و همکاران؛ 1389. تبیین مفهومی تاب‌آوری شاخص سازی آن در مدیریت سوانح اجتماع محور (CBDM). فصلنامه مدرس علوم انسانی، برنامه ریزی آمایش فضا. دورۀ 15. شمارۀ 4. صفحات 41-19.

سلمانی مقدم و همکاران؛ 1393. کاربرد برنامه ریزی کاربری اراضی در افزایش تاب‌آوری شهری در برابر زمین لرزه با استفاده از سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی GIS(نمونه موردی: شهر سبزوار). مطالعات جغرافیایی مناطق خشک، سال پنجم، شماره‌17. صفحات 34-17.

شایان و همکاران؛ 1391. تحلیل مخاطرات فرآیندهای جریانی خشکی مناطق ساحلی خلیج فارس مطالعه موردی: از کنگان تا بوشهر. نشریه تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، سال دوازدهم، شماره 24، صفحات 138-124.

صالحی و همکاران؛ 1390. بررسی میزان تاب‌آوری محیطی با استفاده از مدل شبکۀ علیت. مجله محیط‌شناسی، سال سی و هفتم. شمارۀ 59. صفحات 112-99.

عباس زادگان، مصطفی؛ 1384. بافت‌های فرسوده درون شهری ـ چالش‌ها و راهبردها. همایش توسعه محله‌ای چشم انداز، توسعه پایدار شهر تهران مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات امور اجتماعی و فرهنگی شهرداری تهران.

عبدالخانی نژاد و همکاران؛ 1392. تهدیدات ناشی از مخاطرات محیطی، اقلیمی و زمین ساختی (سیل، زلزله و خشکسالی) با استفاده از Arc GIS (نمونه موردی: شهر بوشهر. دومین کنفرانس بین المللی مخاطرات محیطی، تهران، انتشارات دانشگاه خوارزمی.

فرزاد بهتاش و همکاران؛ 1392. ارزیابی و تحلیل ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های تاب‌آوری کلان‌شهر تبریز. نشریه هنرهای زیبا معماری و شهرسازی، دوره 18. شماره 3. صفحات 42-33.

Ajibade‚ I.‚ McBean‚ G.‚ & Bezner-Kerr‚ R. (2013). Urban flooding in Lagos, Nigeria: Patterns of vulnerability and resilience among women. Global Environmental Change‚ 23(5)‚ 1714–1725.

Alberti, M., Marzluff, J. M., Shulenberger, E., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., & Zumbrunnen, C. (2003). Integrating humans into ecology: Opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience, 53(12), 1169–1179.

Amaratunga, D., & Haigh, R. (2011). Post-disaster reconstruction of the built environment- building for resilience. john Wiley & sons.

Asprone, D., & Latora, V. (2013). Urban network resilience analysis in case of earthquakes. In G. Deodatis, B. R. Elling Wood, & D. M. Frangopol (Eds.), Safety, reliability, risk and life-cycle performance of structures & infrastructures (pp. 4069–4075). London, UK: CRC Press.

Cater, J., & Jones, T. (1989). Social geography: An introduction to contemporary issues. London & New York: Edward Arnold.

Colten, C. E. Kates, R. W., & Laska, S. B. (2008). Community resilience: Lessons from New Orleans and hurricane Katrina, CARRIReport 3. 1-5.

Ernstson, H., van der Leeuw, S. E., Redman, C. L., Meffert, D. J., Davis, G., Alfsen, C. & Elmgvist, T.. (2010). Urban transitions: On urban resilience and human-dominated eco systems. Ambio, 39(8), 531–545.

Godschalk, D. R. (2003). Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural Hazard Review, 4(3), 136-143.

Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics‚4(1), 1-23.

Klein, R. J. N., & Thomalla, F. (2003). Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? Environmental Hazards, 5(1–2), 35 -45.

Leichenko, R. (2011). Climate change and urban resilience. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3(3), 164–168.

Leon‚ J., & March‚ A. (2014). Urban morphology as a tool for supporting tsunami rapid Resilience: A case study of Talcahuano, Chile. Habitat International‚ 43, 250–262.

Liao, K. H. (2012). A theory on urban resilience to floods – A basis for alternative planning practices. Ecology and Society, 17(4), 48-65.

Lu, P., & Stead, D. (2013). Understanding the notion of resilience in spatial planning: A case study of Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Cities, 35, 200–212.

Mayunga, J. S. (2007). Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: A capital-based approach. A draft working paper prepared for the summer academy for social vulnerability and resilience building, 1, 16.

Norris, F.H., stevens, S. P., pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & pfefferbaum, R. L.(2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 127-150.

Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., & Grove, J. M. (2004). Resilient cities: Meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(4), 369–384.

Romero-Lankao, P., & Gnatz, D. M. (2013). Exploring urban transformations in Latin America. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(3–4), 358–367.

Thornbush, M., Golubchikov, O., & Bouzarovski, S. (2013). Sustainable cities targeted by combined mitigation–adaptation efforts for future-proofing. Sustainable Cities and Society, 9, 1–9.

Tyler, S., & Moench, M. (2012). A framework for urban climate resilience. Climate and Development, 4(4), 311–326.

Vale, L. J. & Campanella T. J. (2005). The resilient city: How modern cites recover from disaster- axioms of resilience. ??oxford:Oxford University Press.

Wagner, I., & Breil, P. (2013). The role of eco hydrology in creating more resilient cities. Eco Hydrology & Hydrobiology, 13(2), 113–134.

Wamsler, C., Brink, E., & Rivera, C. (2013). Planning for climate change in urban areas: From theory to practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 68–81.

Wardekker, J. A., de Jong, A., Knoop, J. M., & van der Sluijs, J. P. (2010). Operationalizing a resilience approach to adapting an urban delta to uncertain climate changes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(6), 987–998.

Zhang, Y. (2006). Modeling single family housing recovery after hurricane Andrew in Miami-Dade County, Florida (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Texas A&M University, College Station, TX..