Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards

Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards

Assessment of Flood Vulnerability in the Face of Future Climate Change: An Integrated Approach Using CMIP6 Models, Machine Learning, and Remote Sensing

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Department of Geography & Tourism, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Climatology, Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
4 Faculty of Science and Technology, Athabasca University, Athabasca, AB, T9S 3A3, Canada
Abstract
The increasing frequency of floods driven by global warming and anthropogenic interventions poses a growing challenge. To address this issue, the present study investigates the impacts of future climate change scenarios on flood vulnerability in the Qareh-Sou watershed, Iran. To this end, an integrated approach combining machine learning algorithms, CMIP6 climate models, and remote sensing techniques was employed. Due to its superior accuracy among global models, the MPI-ESM1-2-HR climate model was selected to estimate precipitation trends under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5) across two future time horizons: the mid-future (2041–2070) and the far-future (2071–2100). These scenarios encompass key variables, such as greenhouse gas emissions, urbanization, and land use changes, which play a crucial role in modulating flood susceptibility. Flood susceptibility mapping was conducted using Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms, utilizing 320 flood inventory points alongside 16 environmental and climatic conditioning factors. The predictive accuracy of the models was evaluated using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC-AUC). The results demonstrated the outstanding performance of the RF model; by achieving an AUC of 94.75% during the validation phase and maintaining an accuracy exceeding 90% across all future time horizons and scenarios, this algorithm exhibited absolute superiority over the SVM model. These findings are vital for effective flood risk management.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
In recent years, the frequency and intensity of flood events have escalated globally due to anthropogenic climate change and alterations in land use patterns. These extreme hydrological events pose severe threats to critical infrastructure, ecosystems, and human safety, resulting in substantial economic losses annually. Developing nations, in particular, face heightened vulnerability due to limited resources and adaptive capacity. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports that shifting precipitation patterns are intensifying atmospheric systems, leading to more frequent flash floods. Consequently, understanding and modeling basin-scale flood dynamics is essential for effective risk management and preventive action. The advent of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) and Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) has revolutionized environmental hazard assessment by providing more realistic scenarios of future greenhouse gas emissions and socioeconomic development. However, uncertainties associated with downscaling methods and bias correction necessitate robust multi-index evaluation approaches. Furthermore, integrating Remote Sensing (RS), Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and Machine Learning (ML) algorithms—such as Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—has emerged as a powerful methodology for identifying critical flood-prone areas. Despite these advancements, there remains a knowledge gap in simultaneously assessing the impacts of SSP scenarios and data-driven models in susceptible basins in western Iran. Therefore, this study aims to comprehensively evaluate the effects of climate change on flood susceptibility in the Qareh-Sou River Basin using CMIP6 scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5). The primary objective is to quantify and map changing flood hazards under mid-future (2041–2070) and far-future (2071–2100) horizons to provide actionable insights for water resource management and disaster risk reduction. The advent of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) and Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) has revolutionized environmental hazard assessment by providing more realistic scenarios of future greenhouse gas emissions and socioeconomic development. However, uncertainties associated with downscaling methods and bias correction necessitate robust multi-index evaluation approaches. Furthermore, integrating Remote Sensing (RS), Geographic Information Systems (GIS), and Machine Learning (ML) algorithms—such as Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—has emerged as a powerful methodology for identifying critical flood-prone areas. Despite these advancements, there remains a knowledge gap in simultaneously assessing the impacts of SSP scenarios and data-driven models in susceptible basins in western Iran. Therefore, this study aims to comprehensively evaluate the effects of climate change on flood susceptibility in the Qareh-Sou River Basin using CMIP6 scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5). The primary objective is to quantify and map changing flood hazards under mid-future (2041–2070) and far-future (2071–2100) horizons to provide actionable insights for water resource management and disaster risk reduction. Given the complex nature of flood phenomena, the integration of machine learning algorithms, such as Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), with remote sensing (RS) data provides an innovative approach for the multidimensional and accurate assessment of flood vulnerability (Chen et al., 2024; Hooshyaripor et al., 2024). This integrated data- and model-based framework enhances the ability to capture nonlinear relationships among the natural and anthropogenic factors influencing flood occurrence and substantially improves predictive accuracy compared with conventional statistical methods (Kazemi et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2025). The implementation of this research is expected to contribute not only to the scientific advancement of flood risk management but also to practical decision-making and policy development. The findings can provide a scientific basis for decision-making by key governmental organizations, including the Ministry of Energy, the National Disaster Management Organization, and the Ministry of Agriculture Jihad, particularly in climate change adaptation planning, the development of flood-resilient infrastructure, and the formulation of comprehensive policies aimed at reducing vulnerability in high-risk areas (Khodaei et al., 2025; Naderi et al., 2025).
Material and Methods
This study employs an integrated approach combining climate modeling, remote sensing, and machine learning. The study area is the Qareh-Sou River Basin in Kermanshah Province, western Iran. First, 320 historical flood and non-flood points were extracted using Sentinel-1 SAR imagery via Google Earth Engine and validated through field surveys. Sixteen effective environmental and climatic factors (including topography, hydrology, geology, and land use) were identified and processed into 30-meter raster layers. Multicollinearity among these factors was assessed using Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) and Tolerance (TOL) tests to ensure model stability. For climate projections, the MPI-ESM1-2-HR model from the CMIP6 ensemble was selected based on its superior performance in simulating historical precipitation trends compared to observational data from Kermanshah and Ravansar synoptic stations. Bias correction and statistical downscaling were performed using the Distribution Mapping (DM) method. Future precipitation trends were analyzed under three SSP scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5) for two time horizons: mid-future (2041–2070) and far-future (2071–2100). Flood susceptibility maps were generated using two machine learning algorithms: Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The dataset was randomly split into training (70%) and validation (30%) subsets. Model performance was evaluated using several statistical metrics, including the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC-AUC), Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), Sensitivity, Specificity, and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE).
Results and Discussion
The multicollinearity test confirmed the independence of the 16 input factors (VIF < 10; TOL > 0.1). Among the climate models, MPI-ESM1-2-HR demonstrated the highest accuracy (lowest RMSE and highest R²) after bias correction, as validated by Taylor diagrams and statistical indices. Climate projections indicate a significant increase in annual precipitation volume and extreme rainfall events, particularly in the far-future horizon under the SSP5-8.5 scenario. For instance, precipitation in the Ravansar station is projected to more than double under SSP5-8.5 by 2100. In terms of flood susceptibility modeling, the RF algorithm outperformed SVM significantly. During the validation phase, RF achieved an ROC-AUC of 94.75%, with high sensitivity (91.89%) and specificity (84.62%), whereas SVM yielded a lower AUC of 72.35%. The RF model also maintained exceptional stability across all future scenarios, with AUC values consistently exceeding 90%. In contrast, SVM showed moderate performance with higher RMSE values. Spatial analysis revealed that under the mid-future horizon, the SSP1-2.6 scenario unexpectedly resulted in a wider spatial extent of high-risk areas due to the alignment of precipitation patterns with local topography. However, in the far-future horizon (2071–2100) under the pessimistic SSP5-8.5 scenario, both models predicted a dramatic expansion of high and very high susceptibility classes. Approximately 47–48% of the basin’s total area is projected to fall into critical risk categories, with flood-prone zones expanding from lowland plains into mountainous and foothill regions. This shift is attributed to the intensification of extreme rainfall events interacting with steep slopes and impermeable surfaces.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that climate change will significantly exacerbate flood risks in the Qareh-Sou River Basin, particularly under high-emission scenarios. The Random Forest model proved to be a superior tool for flood susceptibility mapping compared to SVM, offering higher accuracy and stability in handling complex, non-linear relationships between climatic and environmental variables. The findings highlight a critical transition in flood hazard patterns by the end of the century, where risk extends beyond traditional riverine corridors into upstream areas. These results underscore the urgent need for proactive risk management strategies, including improved urban planning, watershed management, and engineering interventions, to enhance resilience against future climate-induced flooding. Policymakers and stakeholders should prioritize adaptive measures based on these high-resolution susceptibility maps to mitigate potential catastrophic losses.
Acknowledgements
This work is based upon research funded by the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) under project No. 40402705.
Keywords
Subjects

©2026 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

Abedi, R., Costache, R., Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H., & Pham, Q. B. (2022). Flash-flood susceptibility mapping based on XGBoost, random forest and boosted regression trees. Geocarto International, 37(19), 5479-5496. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1920636
Arabameri, A., Rezaei, K., Cerdà, A., Conoscenti, C., & Kalantari, Z. (2019). A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran. Science of The Total Environment, 660, 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.021
Arnell, N. W., & Gosling, S. N. (2016). The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale. Climatic Change, 134(3), 387-401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1084-5
Asencios, H., Lavado, W., & Sabino, E. (2023). Climate change effects on flooding at Lurin river basin, Peru. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 9028. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-9028
Bahrami, A., & Dastorani, M. (2021). Estimation of flood hydrograph in the ungauged Gharasou watershed using the Gamma synthetic unit hydrograph model. Journal of Hydrogeomorphology, 8(29), 173-186. [in Persian] https://doi.org/10.22034/hyd.2022.49180.1614
Bai, M., Tahmasebipour, N., Zeinivand, H., Sadoddin, A. & Kaheh, M. (2024). Investigating the Two-Dimensional HEC-RAS Model Capability for Flood Risk Mapping in the Qarachai River in Ramian, Golestan Province. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 12(4), 187–203. [in Persian]  https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2022.75557.1185
Mosavi, A., Ozturk, P., & Chau, K. W. (2018). Flood prediction using machine learning models: Literature review. Water, 10(11), 1536. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111536
Band, S. S., Janizadeh, S., Chandra Pal, S., Saha, A., Chakrabortty, R., Melesse, A. M., & Mosavi, A. (2020). Flash flood susceptibility modeling using new approaches of hybrid and ensemble tree-based machine learning algorithms. Remote Sensing, 12(21), 3568. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213568
Behzadi, F., Javadi, S., Hafezi, S., Vasheghani Farahani, E., & Golmohammadi, G. (2024). Flood risk projection in Iran using CMIP6 models and frequency analysis of precipitation. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 38, 4843–4861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-024-02835-8
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Chen, G., Hou, J., Liu, Y., Xue, S., Wu, H., Wang, T., ... & Yang, S. (2024). Urban inundation rapid prediction method based on multi-machine learning algorithm and rain pattern analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 633, 131059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131059
Choubin, B., Moradi, E., Golshan, M., Adamowski, J., Sajedi-Hosseini, F., & Mosavi, A. (2019). An ensemble prediction of flood susceptibility using multivariate discriminant analysis, classification and regression trees, and support vector machines. Science of The Total Environment, 651, 2087–2096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.064
Copernicus Climate Change Service, Climate Data Store. (2021). CMIP6 climate projections. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.c866074c
Deng, Z., Wang, Z., Wu, X., Lai, C., & Liu, W. (2023). Effect difference of climate change and urbanization on extreme precipitation over the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Atmospheric Research, 282, 106514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106514
Gholami, F., Nemati, A., Li, Y., & Zhang, J. (2022). Calculation of runoff computation cost and sensitivity analysis of topological attributes. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 26, 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2022.100714
Hengl, T., Nussbaum, M., Wright, M. N., Heuvelink, G. B., & Gräler, B. (2018). Random forest as a generic framework for predictive modeling of spatial and spatio-temporal variables. Peer Journal, 6, e5518. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5518
Heo, J.-H., Ahn, H., Shin, J.-Y., Kjeldsen, T. R., & Jeong, C. (2019). Probability distributions for a quantile mapping technique for a bias correction of precipitation data: A case study to precipitation data under climate change. Water, 11(7), 1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071475
Hooshyaripor, F., Faraji-Ashkavar, S., Koohyian, F., Tang, Q., & Noori, R. (2020). Annual flood damage influenced by El Niño in the Kan River basin, Iran. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 20(10), 2739-2751. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2739-2020
Hooshyaripor, F., Faraji-Ashkavar, S., Koohyian, F., Tang, Q., & Noori, R. (2024). Quantifying the impact of future climate change on flood susceptibility: An integration of CMIP6 models, machine learning, and remote sensing. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 150(9), 04024035. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6344
Iosub, M., Minea, G., Chelariu, O. E., & Urzica, A. (2020). Assessment of flash flood susceptibility potential in Bârlad river catchment using bivariate statistics and machine learning approaches. Water, 12(12), 3465. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123465
Janizadeh, S., Kim, D., Jun, C., Bateni, S. M., Pandey, M., & Mishra, V. N. (2024). Impact of climate change on future flood susceptibility projections under shared socioeconomic pathway scenarios in South Asia using artificial intelligence algorithms. Journal of Environmental Management, 124785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.124785
Jiang, D., Hu, D., Tian, Z., & Lang, X. (2020). Differences between CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate over China and the East Asian monsoon. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 37(10), 1102–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-2034-y
Jiang, Z., Yang, S., Liu, Z., Xu, Y., Xiong, Y., Qi, S., … & Xu, T. (2022). Coupling machine learning and weather forecast to predict farmland flood disaster: A case study in Yangtze River basin. Environmental Modelling & Software, 155, 105436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105436
Kazemi, M., Mohammadi, F., Nafooti, M. H., Behvar, K., & Kariminejad, N. (2024). Flood susceptibility mapping using machine learning and remote sensing data in the Southern Karun Basin, Iran. Applied Geomatics, 16(3), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-024-00582-7
Khodaei, H., Nasiri Saleh, F., Nobakht Dalir, A., & Zarei, E. (2025). Future flood susceptibility mapping under climate and land use change. Scientific Reports, 15, 12394. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12394-x
Khosravi, K., Pham, B. T., Chapi, K., Shirzadi, A., Shahabi, H., Revhaug, I., … & Bui, D. T. (2018). A comparative assessment of decision trees algorithms for flash flood susceptibility modeling at Haraz watershed, northern Iran. Science of The Total Environment, 627, 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.266
Khosravi, K., Shahabi, H., Pham, B. T., Adamowski, J., Shirzadi, A., Pradhan, B., … & Ho, H. L. (2019). A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using multi-criteria decision-making analysis and machine learning methods. Journal of Hydrology, 573, 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073
Li, X., & Li, Z. (2023). Evaluation of bias correction techniques for generating high-resolution daily temperature projections from CMIP6 models. Climate Dynamics, 61(7–8), 3893–3910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-023-06778-8
Liu, J., Wang, J., Xiong, J., Cheng, W., Li, Y., Cao, Y., ... & Yang, G. (2022). Assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using support vector machine, logistic regression and their ensemble techniques in the Belt and Road region. Geocarto International, 37(25), 9817-9846. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2025918
Luu, C., Von Meding, J., & Kanjanabootra, S. (2021). Spatial flood risk assessment using multi-criteria decision analysis and remote sensing data in Quang Binh province, Vietnam. Water, 13(12), 1655. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13121655
Maghsood, F. F., Moradi, H., Massah Bavani, A. R., Panahi, M., Berndtsson, R., & Hashemi, H. (2019). Climate change impact on flood frequency and source area in northern Iran under CMIP5 scenarios. Water, 11(2), 273. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020273
McGrath, H. (2026). Multi-event machine learning for annual flood susceptibility prediction across Canada. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XI-M-1-2026, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-XI-M-1-2026-21-2026
Mohanty, M. P., & Simonovic, S. P. (2021). Changes in floodplain regimes over Canada due to climate change impacts: Observations from CMIP6 models. Science of The Total Environment, 792, 148323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148323
Mountrakis, G., Im, J., & Ogole, C. (2011). Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001
Muis, S., Güneralp, B., Jongman, B., Aerts, J. C. J. H., & Ward, P. J. (2015). Flood risk and adaptation strategies under climate change and urban expansion: A probabilistic analysis using global data. Science of the Total Environment, 538, 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.068
Nachappa, T. G., Piralilou, S. T., Gholamnia, K., Ghorbanzadeh, O., Rahmati, O., & Blaschke, T. (2020). Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory. Journal of Hydrology, 590, 125275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125275
Nguyen, H. D., Nguyen, Q. H., Du, Q. V. V., Nguyen, T. H. T., Nguyen, T. G., & Bui, Q. T. (2022). A novel combination of Deep Neural Network and Manta Ray Foraging Optimization for flood susceptibility mapping in Quang Ngai province, Vietnam. Geocarto International, 37(25), 7531-7555. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1975832
Pastén-Zapata, E., Jones, J. M., Moggridge, H., & Widmann, M. (2020). Evaluation of the performance of Euro-CORDEX Regional Climate Models for assessing hydrological climate change impacts in Great Britain: A comparison of different spatial resolutions and quantile mapping bias correction methods. Journal of Hydrology, 584, 124653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124653
Rathjens, H., Bieger, K., Srinivasan, R., Chaubey, I., & Arnold, J. (2016). CMhyd user manual: Documentation for preparing simulated climate change data for hydrologic impact studies. USDA Agricultural Research Service.
Reshmidevi, T., Kumar, D. N., Mehrotra, R., & Sharma, A. (2018). Estimation of the climate change impact on a catchment water balance using an ensemble of GCMs. Journal of Hydrology, 556, 1192-1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.016
Sadler, J. M., Goodall, J. L., Morsy, M. M., & Spencer, K. (2018). Modeling urban coastal flood severity from crowd-sourced flood reports using Poisson regression and random forest. Water Resources Research, 54(11), 9037–9052. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023403
Seleem, O., Ayzel, G., de Souza, A. C. T., Bronstert, A., & Heistermann, M. (2022). Towards urban flood susceptibility mapping using data-driven models in Berlin, Germany. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 13(1), 1640–1662. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2097131
Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H., Valavi, R., Shahabi, H., Chapi, K., & Shirzadi, A. (2018). Novel forecasting approaches using combination of machine learning and statistical models for flood susceptibility mapping. Journal of Environmental Management, 217, 1–11. [in Persian] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.089
Szczurek, A., Gonstał, D., & Maciejewska, M. (2023). The gas sensing drone with the lowered and lifted measurement platform. Sensors, 23(3), 1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031253
Tang, S., Gleckler, P., Xie, S., Lee, J., Ahn, M.-S., Covey, C., & Zhang, C. (2021). Evaluating the diurnal and semidiurnal cycle of precipitation in CMIP6 models using satellite-and ground-based observations. Journal of Climate, 34(8), 3189–3210. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0639.1
Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., Mansor, S., & Ahmad, N. (2015). Flood susceptibility assessment using GIS-based support vector machine model with different kernel types. Catena, 125, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.017
Teutschbein, C., & Seibert, J. (2012). Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods. Journal of Hydrology, 456, 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.052
Ullah, K., Wang, Y., Xi, C., Du, B., Li, P., Liu, T., ... & Hamed, M. M. (2025). Multi-Scenario flood susceptibility projections in the Eastern Hindu kush: integrating machine Learning, CMIP6, and land use change. Earth Systems and Environment, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-025-00793-x
Usta, D. F. B., Teymouri, M., & Chatterjee, U. (2022). Assessment of temperature changes over Iran during the twenty-first century using CMIP6 models under SSP1-26, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 15(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09709-9
Wang, J., Sanderson, J., Iqbal, S., & Woo, W. L. (2025). Accelerated and interpretable flood susceptibility mapping through explainable deep learning with hydrological prior knowledge. Remote Sensing, 17(9), 1540. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17091540
Wang, Q., Xu, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Xiang, J., Xu, Y., & Wang, J. (2020). Individual and combined impacts of future land-use and climate conditions on extreme hydrological events in a representative basin of the Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmospheric Research, 236, 104805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104805
Wang, X., Wang, J., Wang, X., & Yu, C. (2022). A pseudo-spectral Fourier collocation method for inhomogeneous elliptical inclusions with partial differential equations. Mathematics, 10(3), 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030296
Wu, Y., Liu, Y., Zhou, W., & Zhang, J. (2022). The mid-Holocene East Asian summer monsoon simulated by PMIP4-CMIP6 and PMIP3-CMIP5: Model uncertainty and its possible sources. Global and Planetary Change, 219, 103986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2022.103986
Xiang, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Impact of climate change on the hydrological regime of the Yarkant River Basin, China: An assessment using three SSP scenarios of CMIP6 GCMs. Remote Sensing, 14(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14010115
Yazdandoost, F., Moradian, S., Izadi, A., & AghaKouchak, A. (2021). Evaluation of CMIP6 precipitation simulations across different climatic zones: Uncertainty and model intercomparison. Atmospheric Research, 250, 105369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105369
Yousefi, S., Pourghasemi, H. R., Emami, S. N., Rahmati, O., Tavangar, S., Pouyan, S., … & Nekoeimehr, M. (2020). Assessing the susceptibility of schools to flood events in Iran. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75291-3
Zamani, Y., Hashemi Monfared, S. A., & Hamidianpour, M. (2020). A comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 projections for precipitation to observational data: The case of Northeastern Iran. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 142(3), 1613-1623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03406-x
Zangeneh Asadi, M. A., Goli Mokhtari, L. & Namitabar, M. (2026). Flood Risk Assessment, Prediction and Zonation in the Kashafrud Basin Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 15(2), 63–92. [in Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2026.96351.1624
Zarrin, A., & Dadashi-Roudbari, A. (2021). Projection of future extreme precipitation in Iran based on CMIP6 multi-model ensemble. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 144, 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03568-2
Zarrin, A., & Dadashi-Roudbari, A. (2024). Assessment of mean precipitation and precipitation extremes in Iran as simulated by dynamically downscaled RegCM4. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, 106, 101452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2024.101452
Zarrin, A., Dadashi-Roudbari, A., & Hassani, S. (2022). Future changes in precipitation extremes over Iran: Insight from a CMIP6 bias-corrected multi-model ensemble. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 179(1), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-021-02904-x
Zhao, G., Pang, B., Xu, Z., Peng, D., & Xu, L. (2019). Assessment of urban flood susceptibility using semi-supervised machine learning model. Science of The Total Environment, 659, 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.217
Zhu, Y. Y., & Yang, S. (2020). Evaluation of CMIP6 for historical temperature and precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau and its comparison with CMIP5. Advances in Climate Change Research, 11(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2020.08.001
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 10 October 2026

  • Receive Date 25 August 2026
  • Revise Date 08 October 2026
  • Accept Date 10 October 2026
  • Publish Date 10 October 2026