Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards

Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards

Interpretability of Machine Learning Algorithms in Drought Susceptibility Mapping (Case Study: Khozestan Province, Iran)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 Surveying of Department, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran
3 Researcher at Sejong University, Seoul, South Korea
Abstract
In this study, a drought susceptibility map for Khuzestan Province, Iran, was produced using the Random Forest (RF) algorithm combined with the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) interpretability approach. Drought occurrence data were derived from the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) for the period 2018–2022. A total of 18 environmental and climatic factors-including relative humidity, wind speed, evapotranspiration, minimum and maximum temperatures, elevation, slope, slope aspect, topographic wetness index (TWI), land cover, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), soil water content, river density, water level, sandy soil, soil bulk density, clay content, and soil texture-were used as input variables for modeling drought susceptibility. Model performance was evaluated using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, yielding an Area Under the Curve (AUC) value of 0.987, which demonstrates the excellent predictive performance of the Random Forest algorithm. According to the drought susceptibility map, 31.03% of the study area falls in the “very low” class, 8.18% in “low”, 8.30% in “moderate”, 10.88% in “high”, and 41.58% in the “very high” susceptibility class. The highest spatial frequency was observed in the “very low” and “very high” categories. Based on SHAP results, elevation, maximum temperature, topographic wetness index, wind speed, and slope were identified as the most influential factors contributing to drought occurrence. This research highlights the advantages of interpretable machine learning approaches in drought susceptibility assessment, providing valuable insights for environmental planners and decision-makers to mitigate the adverse impacts of drought.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The frequent occurrence of droughts in recent decades has posed significant challenges to the sustainability of ecosystems, agriculture, and socio-economic development. Drought is defined as a prolonged deficiency of precipitation over a specific period and represents a complex phenomenon characterized by reductions in soil moisture, declines in surface water flows, decreases in groundwater levels, and simultaneous increases in temperature. Droughts are typically classified into meteorological, agricultural, hydrological, socio-economic, and environmental types, and they exert both direct and indirect impacts, including global warming, deforestation, and urbanization. Machine learning algorithms, including SVM, BRT, RF, XGBoost, KNN, and CNN, exhibit strong capabilities in drought prediction, particularly the Random Forest (RF) algorithm, which offers high accuracy and computational efficiency. However, the “black-box” nature of these models limits physical interpretability, making the application of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques and the Shapley method essential for analyzing both the positive and negative effects of features and their interactions. Recent studies have demonstrated that integrating the Random Forest (RF) algorithm with the Shapley method enhances both the accuracy of drought prediction and the analysis of climatic, soil, topographic, and socio-economic factors. This study aims to improve the interpretability of the RF algorithm and to develop a drought sensitivity map for Khuzestan Province, with its novelty lying in the application of a spatially interpretable approach to analyze the factors influencing drought occurrence.
Material and Methods
Khuzestan Province, located in southwestern Iran, covers an area of approximately 64,236 km² with elevations ranging from 0 to 3,740 m, and experiences a climate spectrum from arid to humid. Despite its major rivers and extensive water resources, the region has been increasingly affected by environmental crises due to recurrent droughts and overexploitation of water. The development of water-intensive industries, expansion of large-scale agricultural lands, and cultivation of high-water-demand crops have intensified pressure on water resources. Additionally, declining precipitation in neighboring provinces and increased groundwater extraction have exacerbated drought conditions, impacting approximately 98.7% of the province between 2012 and 2021.
To model drought susceptibility, a total of 19 climatic, topographic, soil, and hydrological variables were considered, including precipitation, relative humidity, wind speed, evapotranspiration, minimum and maximum temperatures, elevation, slope and aspect, topographic wetness index, land cover, vegetation index, soil water content, river density, water table level, sand and clay fractions, bulk density, and overall soil texture. Climatic data were derived from the annual averages of 22 meteorological stations across Khuzestan Province (2018–2022), while soil data were obtained from the USDA database via Google Earth Engine (GEE). Elevation, slope, slope direction, and watershed power index layers were generated from the SRTM digital elevation model with a resolution of 30 x 30 meters, and the vegetation index was generated from NDVI based on Landsat 8 images from 2019 to 2022. River density was calculated using the Line Density tool in ArcMap, and the water surface layer was extracted from well water table depth data (piezometric data from the National Water Resources Management Company). The land cover layer was generated by integrating Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 imagery based on the 13 classes defined by Ghorban et al. (2020). Subsequently, all layers were transformed into raster format with a spatial resolution of 250 m using the Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) method to facilitate drought modeling.
The Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) was employed to produce the drought map, as it quantifies precipitation deficits across various time scales and is recognized as a reliable indicator for drought monitoring. Drought susceptibility was modeled using the Random Forest algorithm, which is capable of handling large, multivariate datasets while providing robust predictive performance. To enhance model interpretability, the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method was applied to assess the contribution of each input variable to drought prediction. Model accuracy was assessed using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) indices, while the coefficient of determination (R²) was calculated as a dimensionless measure of model fit. The performance of the drought susceptibility map was further evaluated using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) index, where values approaching 1 indicate a strong capability of the model to accurately predict vulnerable areas.
Results and Discussion
In this study, the Random Forest model was employed to predict drought occurrences in Khuzestan Province based on environmental and climatic variables. Model performance was assessed using a 10-fold cross-validation approach, with 70% of the data allocated for training and the remaining 30% for testing. The results demonstrated that the model exhibited excellent performance, with an R² of 0.925, MAE of 0.035, and RMSE of 0.137, indicating a high level of accuracy in drought prediction. Interpretability analysis using the Shapley method revealed that precipitation, elevation, topographic wetness index, relative humidity, and wind speed were the most influential factors, with minimum precipitation exerting a particularly significant effect. The model output was generalized in ArcMap software and using the natural failure method, the drought sensitivity map was classified into five classes: "very low, low, medium, high, and very high." The results showed that 45.26% of the area was in the "very low" class, 4.25% in "low," 8.5% in "medium," 25.8% in "high," and 36.4% in "very high." An AUC value of 0.972 further confirmed the model’s outstanding performance. These results highlight the Random Forest model as a powerful tool for drought identification, capable of capturing complex and nonlinear relationships while processing both numerical and categorical data, thereby providing effective support for environmental management and decision-making.
Conclusion
Recent drought events have inflicted substantial impacts on both the environment and human activities. In this study, a drought susceptibility map for Khuzestan Province was developed using the Random Forest model in combination with the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method for interpretability. The model demonstrated excellent predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.972. Analysis revealed that precipitation, elevation, relative humidity, the topographic wetness index, and wind speed were the most influential factors driving drought occurrence, whereas soil texture and land cover exhibited comparatively lower impacts. The most prevalent categories in the drought susceptibility map were “very low” and “very high.” Areas including Andimeshk and Dezful were classified as “very low,” while parts of Mahshahr and Ahvaz fell into the “very high” category. Drought susceptibility mapping serves as an effective tool for identifying vulnerable regions and informing management strategies, thereby enhancing the resilience of both ecosystems and human communities.
Keywords
Subjects

©2026 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

 

 

Abbes, A. B., Inoubli, R., Rhif, M., & Farah, I. R. (2023). Combining deep learning methods and multi-resolution analysis for drought forecasting modeling. Earth Science Informatics, 16(2), 1811-1820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01009-4
AghaKouchak, A., Huning, L. S., Sadegh, M., Qin, Y., Markonis, Y., Vahedifard, F., ... & Kreibich, H. (2023). Toward impact-based monitoring of drought and its cascading hazards. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4(8), 582-595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00457-2
Al-Abadi, A. M. (2018). Mapping flood susceptibility in an arid region of southern Iraq using ensemble machine learning classifiers: a comparative study. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11(9), 218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3584-5
Azizi, M., & Abbasi, A. (2025). Developing a Robust Data-Driven Model Based on Ground and Satellite Measured Data for Agricultural Drought Prediction in Iran. Ferdowsi Civil Engineering, 38(1). [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/jfcei.2024.88855.1311
Bahiraie, M., Hosseini, S. M., & Hossein-Panahi, B. (2025). Groundwater resources exploitation management in response to water scarcity challenges in Khuzestan Province, Iran. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering, 13(3), 268-285. doi: https://doi.org/10.26599/JGSE.2025.9280054
Baloei, F., Kabolizadeh, M., & Mohammadi, S. (2024). Monitoring temporal-spatial changes of meteorological drought and trend analysis of climatic variables in Khuzestan province from 2000 to 2020. Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards13(40), 73-94. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22111/JNEH.2024.46574.1987 
Band, S. S., Janizadeh, S., Chandra Pal, S., Saha, A., Chakrabortty, R., Melesse, A. M., & Mosavi, A. (2020). Flash flood susceptibility modeling using new approaches of hybrid and ensemble tree-based machine learning algorithms. Remote Sensing, 12(21), 3568. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213568
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Cai, H., Shi, H., Zhou, Z., Liu, S., & Babovic, V. (2024). Explaining the mechanism of multiscale groundwater drought events: A new perspective from interpretable deep learning model. Water Resources Research, 60(7), e2023WR035139. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035139
Chang, D. L., Yang, S. H., Hsieh, S. L., Wang, H. J., & Yeh, K. C. (2020). Artificial intelligence methodologies applied to prompt pluvial flood estimation and prediction. Water, 12(12), 3552. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123552
Chen, C., Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Chen, D. (2024). Explainable artificial intelligence framework for urban global digital elevation model correction based on the SHapley additive explanation-random forest algorithm considering spatial heterogeneity and factor optimization. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 129, 103843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.103843
Chen, J., Li, M., & Wang, W. (2012). Statistical uncertainty estimation using random forests and its application to drought forecast. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2012(1), 915053. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/915053
Chen, W., Li, Y., Xue, W., Shahabi, H., Li, S., Hong, H., & Ahmad, B. B. (2020). Modeling flood susceptibility using data-driven approaches of naïve bayes tree, alternating decision tree, and random forest methods. Science of The Total Environment, 701, 134979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134979
De Meester, J., & Willems, P. (2024). Analysing spatial variability in drought sensitivity of rivers using explainable artificial intelligence. Science of The Total Environment, 931, 172685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172685
Demissie, Z., Rimal, P., Seyoum, W. M., Dutta, A., & Rimmington, G. (2024). Flood susceptibility mapping: Integrating machine learning and GIS for enhanced risk assessment. Applied Computing and Geosciences, 23, 100183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acags.2024.100183
Dikshit, A., Pradhan, B., & Alamri, A. M. (2020). Short-term spatio-temporal drought forecasting using random forests model at New South Wales, Australia. Applied Sciences, 10(12), 4254. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124254
Dikshit, A., Pradhan, B., & Santosh, M. (2022). Artificial neural networks in drought prediction in the 21st century–A scientometric analysis. Applied Soft Computing, 114, 108080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108080
Dubey, A., Swami, D., Gupta, V., & Joshi, N. (2023). From the peaks to the plains: investigating the role of elevation in governing drought dynamics over the Indus river basin. Atmospheric Research, 291, 106824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106824
Elbeltagi, A., Pande, C. B., Kumar, M., Tolche, A. D., Singh, S. K., Kumar, A., & Vishwakarma, D. K. (2023). Prediction of meteorological drought and standardized precipitation index based on the random forest (RF), random tree (RT), and Gaussian process regression (GPR) models. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(15), 43183-43202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25221-3
En-Nagre, K., Aqnouy, M., Ouarka, A., Naqvi, S. A. A., Bouizrou, I., El Messari, J. E. S., ... & El-Askary, H. (2024). Assessment and prediction of meteorological drought using machine learning algorithms and climate data. Climate Risk Management, 45, 100630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2024.100630
Fadaei-Kermani, E., Barani, G. A., & Ghaeini-Hessaroeyeh, M. (2017). Drought monitoring and prediction using K-nearest neighbor algorithm. Journal of AI and data mining, 5(2), 319-325. https://doi.org/10.22044/jadm.2017.881
Farhadi, H., & Najafzadeh, M. (2021). Flood risk mapping by remote sensing data and random forest technique. Water, 13(21), 3115. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13213115
Feng, P., Wang, B., Li Liu, D., & Yu, Q. (2019). Machine learning-based integration of remotely sensed drought factors can improve the estimation of agricultural drought in South-Eastern Australia. Agricultural Systems, 173, 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.015
Feng, W., Lu, H., Yao, T., & Yu, Q. (2020). Drought characteristics and its elevation dependence in the Qinghai–Tibet plateau during the last half-century. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 14323. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71295-1
Gholami, H., Mohamadifar, A., Sorooshian, A., & Jansen, J. D. (2020). Machine-learning algorithms for predicting land susceptibility to dust emissions: The case of the Jazmurian Basin, Iran. Atmospheric pollution research, 11(8), 1303-1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.05.009
Ghorbani, M. A., Deo, R. C., Kashani, M. H., Shahabi, M., & Ghorbani, S. (2019). Artificial intelligence-based fast and efficient hybrid approach for spatial modelling of soil electrical conductivity. Soil and Tillage Research, 186, 152-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.09.012
Ghorbanian, A., Kakooei, M., Amani, M., Mahdavi, S., Mohammadzadeh, A., & Hasanlou, M. (2020). Improved Land Cover Map of Iran Using Sentinel Imagery within Google Earth Engine and a Novel Automatic Workflow for Land Cover Classification Using Migrated Training Samples. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,167, 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.07.013
Gibson, P. B., Chapman, W. E., Altinok, A., Delle Monache, L., DeFlorio, M. J., & Waliser, D. E. (2021). Training machine-learning models on climate model output yields skillful interpretable seasonal precipitation forecasts. Communications Earth & Environment, 2(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00225-4
Guo, Z., Tian, B., Zhu, Y., He, J., & Zhang, T. (2024). How do the landslide and non-landslide sampling strategies impact landslide susceptibility assessment?—A catchment-scale case study from China. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 16(3), 877-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.07.026
Hajarian, A. (2025). Meteorological Drought Risk Monitoring and Zoning Using Random Forest Model. Journal of Drought and Climate Change Research, 3(1), 83-94. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22077/jdcr.2025.8551.1093
Huang, C., She, D., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y., Shi, X., & Wei, Y. (2025). Predicting future meteorological drought risk in mainland China using random forest model. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 61, 102633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102633
Hussain, A., Niaz, R., Almazah, M. M., Al-Rezami, A. Y., Cheng, H., & Tariq, A. (2025). Utilizing Logistic Regression and Random Forest to Model Meteorological Drought Persistence Across Seasonal Transitions. Earth Systems and Environment, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-025-00682-3
Hussain, A., Niaz, R., Al-Rezami, A. Y., Mohamed Omer, A., S. Al-Duais, F., & MA Almazah, M. (2025). Application of random forest for identification of an appropriate model for predicting meteorological drought. Advances in Meteorology, 2025(1), 7674140. https://doi.org/10.1155/adme/7674140
Jahangir, M. H., & Mohammadi, A. (2016). Compare Standard Precipitation Index and TOPSIS ranking method to assess the drought adventure Condition in Khouzestan province. Environmental Management Hazards, 3(2), 125-139. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/JHSCI.2016.60343
Khan, N., Sachindra, D. A., Shahid, S., Ahmed, K., Shiru, M. S., & Nawaz, N. (2020). Prediction of droughts over Pakistan using machine-learning algorithms. Advances in Water Resources, 139, 103562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103562
Koochak, S. S., & Behnia, A. (2013). Monitoring and Prediction of Khuzestan Province, Iran Drought Using SPI drought Index and Markov Chain. Journal of Irrigation Sciences and Engineering, 36(3),1-12. [In Persian]
Li, X., Jia, H., & Wang, L. (2023). Remote sensing monitoring of drought in Southwest China using random forest and eXtreme gradient boosting methods. Remote Sensing, 15(19), 4840. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15194840
Liu, J., Li, M., Li, R., Shalamzari, M. J., Ren, Y., & Silakhori, E. (2025). Comprehensive Assessment of Drought Susceptibility Using Predictive Modeling, Climate Change Projections, and Land Use Dynamics for Sustainable Management. Land, 14(2), 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14020337
Lotfirad, M., Esmaeili-Gisavandani, H., & Adib, A. (2022). Drought monitoring and prediction using SPI, SPEI, and random forest model in various climates of Iran. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 13(2), 383-406. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2021.287
Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J. M., Nair, B., & Lee, S. I. (2020). From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(1), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9
Mahmoudi, P., Daneshmand, H., (2018). The Application of Wavelet Analysis to Identify the Periodic Behavior of Droughts in Iran, Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 7(1), 153-168. [In Persian]  https://doi.org/10.22067/geo.v7i1.60717
McKee, T. B., Doesken, N. J., & Kleist, J. (1993). The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, 22, 179-183. https://climate.colostate.edu/pdfs/relationshipofdroughtfrequency.pdf
Mokhtar, A., Jalali, M., He, H., Al-Ansari, N., Elbeltagi, A., Alsafadi, K., & Rodrigo-Comino, J. (2021). Estimation of SPEI meteorological drought using machine learning algorithms. IEEe Access, 9, 65503-65523. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3074305
Nakagawa, S., & Holger S. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
Nejadrekabi, M., Eslamian, S., & Zareian, M. J. (2022). Spatial statistics techniques for SPEI and NDVI drought indices: a case study of Khuzestan Province. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(7), 6573-6594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03852-8
Oyarzabal, R. S., Santos, L. B., Cunningham, C., Broedel, E., de Lima, G. R., Cunha-Zeri, G., ... & Cunha, A. P. (2025). Forecasting drought using machine learning: a systematic literature review. Natural Hazards, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07195-2
Ozupek, E., Teke, A., Celik, N., & Kavzoglu, T. (2025). Explainable artificial intelligence to explore the intrinsic characteristics of climatic parameters governing meteorological drought forecasting: opening the black box. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 39, 3201-3222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-025-03007-y
Park, H., Kim, K., & Lee, D. K. (2019). Prediction of severe drought area based on random forest: Using satellite image and topography data. Water, 11(4), 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040705
Park, S., Im, J., Jang, E., & Rhee, J. (2016). Drought assessment and monitoring through blending of multi-sensor indices using machine learning approaches for different climate regions. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 216, 157-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.10.011
Parker, T., & Gallant, A. J. (2022). The role of heavy rainfall in drought in Australia. Weather and Climate Extremes, 38, 100528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2022.100528
Piri, S., & Ghojghar, M. A. (2025). Development of intelligent machine learning and Jenkins box models based on the full ensemble mode decomposition method for meteorological drought modeling (Case study: Khuzestan Province). Climate Change Research, 6(22), 81-96. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.30488/CCR.2025.516420.1276
Rahmati, O., Darabi, H., Panahi, M., Kalantari, Z., Naghibi, S. A., Ferreira, C. S. S., ... & Haghighi, A. T. (2020). Development of novel hybridized models for urban flood susceptibility mapping. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 12937. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69703-7
Rezaei, P., Roshni, M., & Amirabadizadeh, S. M., (2016). The Study of Relationship between Intensity, Duration, Frequency and Involvement Level with Drought in the Northwest of Iran, Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 3(2), 91-110. [In Persian]  https://ccr.gu.ac.ir/article_220614.html?
Seyedi Ghaldareh, J., Ahmadi, S., & Gholamnia, M. (2023). Evaluation of remote sensing-based drought monitoring indexes using support vector regression and random forest models (Case study: Marivan city). Engineering Journal of Geospatial Information Technology10(3), 121-141. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.52547/jgit.10.3.121
Shogrkhodaei, S. Z., Razavi-Termeh, S. V., & Fathnia, A. (2021). Spatio-temporal modeling of PM2.5 risk mapping using three machine learning algorithms. Environmental Pollution, 289, 117859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117859
Soltani, S., Saboohi, R., & Yaghmaei, L. (2012). Rainfall and rainy days trend in Iran. Climatic Change, 110(1), 187-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0146-1
Tavakol, A., Rahmani, V., & Harrington Jr, J. (2020). Temporal and spatial variations in the frequency of compound hot, dry, and windy events in the central United States. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 15691. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72624-0
Torkaman Pary, A., Rastgoo, P., Opp, C., Zeuss, D., & Abera, T. A. (2024). Impacts of Drought Severity and Frequency on Natural Vegetation Across Iran. Water, 16(22), 3334. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16223334
Tramblay, Y., & Quintana Seguí, P. (2022). Estimating soil moisture conditions for drought monitoring with random forests and a simple soil moisture accounting scheme. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 22(4), 1325-1334. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1325-2022
Vagheei, R., Torabi, Z., & Ghaemi, A. (2021). Drought assessment using standardized precipitation index and random forest algorithm. Journal of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science3(4), 390-405. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22034/jmas.2021.302576.1153
Wang, Q., Zhao, L., Wang, M., Wu, J., Zhou, W., Zhang, Q., & Deng, M. (2022). A random forest model for drought: Monitoring and validation for grassland drought based on multi-source remote sensing data. Remote Sensing, 14(19), 4981. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194981
Xue, Z., Diao, S., Yang, F., Fei, L., Wang, W., Fang, L., & Liu, Y. (2025). Identifying Forest Drought Sensitivity Drivers in China Under Lagged and Accumulative Effects via XGBoost-SHAP. Remote Sensing, 17(16), 2903. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17162903
Yariyan, P., Avand, M., Abbaspour, R. A., Torabi Haghighi, A., Costache, R., Ghorbanzadeh, O., & Blaschke, T. (2020). Flood susceptibility mapping using an improved analytic network process with statistical models. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 11(1), 2282-2314. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2020.1836036
Zarasvandi, A., Carranza, E. J. M., Moore, F., & Rastmanesh, F. (2011). Spatio-temporal occurrences and mineralogical–geochemical characteristics of airborne dusts in Khuzestan Province (southwestern Iran). Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 111(3), 138-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2011.04.004
Zarei, A. R., Mahmoudi, M. R., & Moghimi, M. M. (2023). Determining the most appropriate drought index using the random forest algorithm with an emphasis on agricultural drought. Natural Hazards, 115(1), 923-946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05579-2
Zhang, B., Salem, F. K. A., Hayes, M. J., Smith, K. H., Tadesse, T., & Wardlow, B. D. (2023). Explainable machine learning for the prediction and assessment of complex drought impacts. Science of The Total Environment, 898, 165509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165509
Zhang, J., Ma, X., Zhang, J., Sun, D., Zhou, X., Mi, C., & Wen, H. (2023). Insights into geospatial heterogeneity of landslide susceptibility based on the SHAP-XGBoost model. Journal of Environmental Management, 332, 117357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117357
Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., Bai, Y., Zhang, S., Yang, S., Henchiri, M., & Nanzad, L. (2022). Drought monitoring and performance evaluation based on machine learning fusion of multi-source remote sensing drought factors. Remote Sensing14(24), 6398. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246398
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 03 February 2026
  • Revise Date 28 April 2026
  • Accept Date 30 April 2026
  • Publish Date 22 June 2026