Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards

Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards

Forecasting and Trend Analysis of Precipitation in the Navrud Watershed Based on CMIP6 Climate Models

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
Abstract
Accurate precipitation forecasting is crucial for water resource management and preparedness for climatic events. In this regard, this research utilized five selected CMIP6 models to project the behavior of daily precipitation for stations within the Navrud watershed. The model data were downscaled using three bias correction methods (Local Intensity Scaling, Distribution Mapping, and Power Transformation) in the CMhyd software. During the evaluation of these methods’ accuracy based on statistical indices (R², RMSE, MAE, MSE, and NSE), the Local Intensity Scaling method demonstrated the best performance in reproducing the observed precipitation patterns. Finally, the MPI-ESM1-2-HR, MRI-ESM2-0, MIROC6, CNRM-CM6-1, and EC-Earth3-Veg models were chosen as the top-performing models and were employed in an ensemble model to predict precipitation for the next 30-year period (2025–2054) under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. The results indicated that the spatial pattern of precipitation in the Navrud watershed during the baseline period (1985–2014) decreased from east (Kharjagil station) to west (Nav station), and the ensemble model successfully simulated this spatial precipitation pattern. However, the ensemble model’s projection for the future period (2025–2054), while maintaining the overall precipitation distribution pattern, showed that according to the SSP2-4.5 scenario, precipitation at Khelian, Kharjgil, and Nav stations will decrease by 10.9, 9.3 and 5.5% respectively, and according to the SSP5-8.5 scenario, it will decrease by 8.3%, 8.01%, and 3.4% compared to the baseline period. Furthermore, drought periods are expected to intensify from May to October. Trend analysis using the modified Mann-Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator indicated the absence of a statistically significant trend in the daily precipitation of the stations.
Introduction
Climate change, as one of the most significant global challenges, has widespread impacts on the environment, human livelihoods, and economic sustainability. This phenomenon can particularly lead to social and economic instability in regions whose economies depend on climate-sensitive sectors such as agriculture. Therefore, understanding past, present, and future climate trends, variability, and changes is essential for designing strategies to mitigate the adverse effects of this phenomenon. Among the various climate elements, precipitation, as a key hydro-climatic variable, plays a vital role in agricultural production and water resources management, directly influencing the social, economic, and environmental sustainability of regions. Climate change can cause significant fluctuations in precipitation patterns, resulting in floods, droughts, and landslides. These fluctuations also affect drinking water supply, groundwater and surface water resources, and agricultural productivity, posing challenges to water resources management. Accordingly, accurate and long-term precipitation projections form a fundamental basis for water resource planning, agricultural infrastructure design, natural disaster risk management, and the development of mitigation policies.
Material and Methods
In this study, daily precipitation data from three rain gauge stations Khalian, Kharejgil, and Nav were obtained from the Gilan Regional Water Company. To simulate future precipitation, five models from the CMIP6 ensemble, including MPI-ESM1-2-HR, MRI-ESM2-0, MIROC6, CNRM-CM6-1, and EC-Earth3-Veg, were selected from the ESGFDL database. Daily precipitation simulations for the historical period were then conducted using the outputs of the selected models and three bias-correction methods Local Intensity Scaling, Distribution Mapping, and Power Transformation implemented in the CMhyd software. After applying these methods, the optimal bias-correction technique and the best-performing models were identified based on evaluation metrics, including the coefficient of determination (R²), mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE). Subsequently, to integrate the results of the selected models and reduce uncertainty, the Homadi model was applied using a rank-based approach and weighting of the top-performing models. Future precipitation projections for a 30-year period (2025–2054) were then generated based on the Homadi model outputs under two climate change scenarios: SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5. To analyze the spatiotemporal variations in precipitation, mean monthly precipitation graphs for the studied stations were plotted, and annual precipitation totals were spatially mapped. Finally, the significance of precipitation trends during the baseline period and future horizon was assessed using the modified Mann Kendall test and Sen’s slope estimator.
Results and Discussion
In this study, precipitation simulation and projection for the Navrud watershed were carried out using five selected CMIP6 climate models and three bias-correction methods. To evaluate model performance, network-averaged statistical error metrics derived from station observations were employed. The results indicated that the Local Intensity Scaling bias-correction method outperformed the Power Transformation and Distribution Mapping approaches in terms of accuracy. Accordingly, the MPI-ESM1-2-HR, MRI-ESM2-0, MIROC6, CNRM-CM6-1, and EC-Earth3-Veg models, when corrected using the Local Intensity Scaling method, showed the highest consistency with observed data and were subsequently incorporated into the Homadi ensemble model based on their respective ranks and assigned weights for further analyses. Analysis of the spatial distribution of mean annual precipitation during the baseline period (1985–2014) revealed a decreasing gradient from east to west across the watershed, with the Kharejgil station identified as the wettest location and the Nav station as the driest. The Homadi model successfully reproduced this spatial pattern for the historical period with acceptable accuracy. Future precipitation projections for the period 2025–2054 under the SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios indicate that, although the spatial pattern of precipitation is largely preserved, the absolute values of annual precipitation are expected to decline at all stations. Notably, the reduction is projected to be slightly more pronounced under the intermediate scenario than under the pessimistic scenario. Such changes may have significant implications for regional water resources and intensify water stress in the study area. The analysis of monthly precipitation suggests a relative stability in the seasonal precipitation regime across all three stations. Autumn months, particularly October and November, continue to contribute the largest share of annual precipitation, whereas summer months—especially July and August remain the driest period of the year. Nevertheless, month-to-month variations differ depending on the climate scenario, and a relative increase in precipitation is projected for some colder months. The results of the modified Mann–Kendall test applied to daily precipitation at all three stations indicate that no statistically significant increasing or decreasing trends are evident in either the historical or future periods. The very small Sen’s slope values, Z-statistics close to zero, and high p-values suggest that precipitation variability is largely random and does not follow a distinct climatic trend. Overall, the findings confirm the effectiveness of the Homadi model in representing precipitation patterns and highlight the necessity of climate-adaptive planning to ensure sustainable water resource management in the Navrud watershed.
Conclusion
Analysis of climatic data for the Navrud watershed during the period 2005–2024 indicates that the region has experienced notable changes in precipitation, temperature, and soil moisture. The spatial pattern of precipitation reveals a concentration of rainfall in the eastern and northern parts of the watershed, with decreasing amounts toward the central and southwestern areas. Temporally, precipitation exhibited an increasing trend up to approximately 2020, followed by a marked decline in recent years. In contrast, temperature shows a consistent and sustained upward trend across the entire watershed, with an average increase of approximately 2.76 °C. This warming has been more pronounced in the eastern part of the basin, intensifying evapotranspiration processes and contributing to a reduction in soil moisture. Despite a relative increase in mean soil moisture, its interannual variability has been considerable, particularly during low-precipitation years. The De Martonne aridity index further characterizes the climate of the watershed as ranging from arid to semi-arid in the central and eastern regions, while indicating relatively more humid conditions in the northwestern part of the basin. The results of precipitation simulations using CMIP6 models demonstrate that the Local Intensity Scaling bias-correction method provides the best performance, and that the selected models are capable of accurately reproducing the spatial precipitation pattern of the baseline period. Projections for the future period (2025–2054) suggest that, although the overall precipitation pattern is preserved, a gradual decline in precipitation is expected at all stations, with a more pronounced reduction under the SSP2-4.5 scenario. The modified Mann–Kendall test further confirms the absence of statistically significant trends in daily precipitation. Overall, while the seasonal precipitation regime is largely maintained, reductions in summer precipitation and shifts in seasonal distribution may pose serious challenges for water resources management and climate change adaptation in the Navrud watershed.
Keywords
Subjects

©2026 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

Abbasi, H., Aalami, M. T., & Faraji, M. (2022). Trend analysis of discharge and sediment load of Mardoqchay River using non-parametric tests. Hydrogeomorphology, 9(32), 87–104. [In Persian] https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23833254.1401.9.32.5.3
Abdollahi, K., Bayati, S., & Nasr Esfahani, M. A. (2019). Spatial distribution of runoff and groundwater recharge across land use and slope classes in the Vank watershed. Watershed Management and Engineering, 11(4), 866–878. [In Persian]  https://doi.org/10.22092/ijwmse.2018.120332.1431
Anvari-Rostami, A., Azar, A., & Norouzi, M. (2014). EPS forecast modeling using neuro-fuzzy networks. Financial Accounting and Auditing Research, 6(23), 1–15. [In Persian] https://doi.org/20.1001.1.23830379.1393.6.23.1.5
Asadi, H., Jafari, M., Ashrafzadeh, A., & Sharifi, A. (2018). Prediction of climate change effects on soil erosion hazard in the Navorud watershed. Water and Soil Conservation, 25(2), 235–250. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22069/jwsc.2018.12223.2679
Asadi, M. (2025). Comparison of the outcomes of the CMIP5 and CMIP6 reports on the trends of climatic parameters affecting almond growth: A case study in Birjand County. Journal of Geography and Planning29(92), 332-313. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22034/gp.2024.61686.3262
Ayugi, B., Tan, G., Gnitou, G. T., Ojara, M., & Ongoma, V. (2020). Historical evaluations and simulations of precipitation over East Africa from Rossby Centre Regional Climate Model. Atmospheric Research, 232, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104698
Babaeian, I., Modirian, R., Khazanedari, L., Karimian, M., Kouzegaran, S., Kouhi, M., … & Malbusi, S. (2023). Projection of Iran’s precipitation in 21st Century using downscaling of selected CMIP6 Models by CMHyd. Journal of the Earth and Space Physics, 49(2), 431–449. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/jesphys.2023.332410.1007436
Baycan, A., Sonmez, O., & Tuncer Evcil, G. (2025). Climate change effects on precipitation and streamflow in the Mediterranean region. Water, 17(17), 2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17172556
Bian, C., Liang, X., Li, B., Hu, Z., Min, X., & Yue, Z. (2025). The future climate change projections for the Hengduan Mountain region based on CMIP6 models. Sustainability, 17(12), 5306. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125306
Chen, H., Guo, J., Zhang, Z., & Xu, Ch-Y. (2013). Prediction of temperature and precipitation in Sudan and South Sudan by using LARS-WG in future. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 113, 363–375.
Duong, S., Song, L., & Chhin, R. (2023). Precipitation projection in Cambodia using statistically downscaled CMIP6 models. Climate, 11(12), 245. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11120245
Enyew, F. B., Sahlu, D., Tarekegn, G. B., Hama, S., & Debele, S. E. (2024). Performance evaluation of CMIP6 climate model projections for precipitation and temperature in the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Climate, 12(11), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli12110169
Fallah Ghalhari, G. A., Yousefi, H., Hosseinzadeh, A., Alimardani, M., & Reyhani, E. (2019). Assessment of climate change in Bojnourd Station in 2016–2050 using downscaling models LARS-WG and SDSM. Iranian Journal of Ecohydrology, 6(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.22059/ije.2018.265918.952
Fan, X., Duan, Q., Shen, C., Wu, Y., & Xing, C. (2022). Evaluation of historical CMIP6 model simulations and future projections of temperature over the Pan-Third Pole region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 26214–26229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18704-5
Frotan, M., Salahi, B., Zeinali, B., & Mesgari, E. (2025). Drought trend analysis and forecasting in the Moghan Plain using the SPI index and CMIP6 climate models. Water and Soil Management and Modelling, 5(3), 230–260. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22098/mmws.2025.17356.1594
Hafezi-Moghaddas, N., Lashkaripour, G. R., & Parsaei, R. (2024). Performance evaluation of CMIP6 models in projecting temperature and precipitation changes in Chah-Nimeh, Sistan and Baluchestan. Climatology Research, 14(56), 165–178. [In Persian] https://clima.irimo.ir/article_192161
Hamed, K. H., & Rao, A. R. (1998). A modified Mann-Kendall trend test for autocorrelated data. Journal of Hydrology, 204(1-4), 182-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00125-X
Hamidianpour, M., & Shoja, F. (2022). Introduction to methods and techniques of climate and climate change modeling. Sistan and Baluchestan: University of Sistan and Baluchestan Press. [In Persian]
He, M., Chen, Y., Sun, H., & Liu, J. (2023). Projected changes in precipitation based on the CMIP6 optimal multi-model ensemble in the Pearl River Basin, China. Remote Sensing, 15(18), 4608. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15184608
Ignacio Reardon, S. J. I., & Luo, J. (2023). Evaluation of the performance of CMIP6 climate models in simulating rainfall over the Philippines. Atmosphere, 14(9), 1459. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14091459
Jahanghbaksh-Asl, S., Rezaei-Banafsh, M., Khorshiddust, A. M., Rostamzadeh, H., & Ostadi, E. (2023). Precipitation projection in northwestern Iran based on outputs of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). Climatology Research, 14(56), 1–14. [In Persian] https://clima.irimo.ir/article_187666.html
Karimi Ahmad abad, M., & Nabizadeh, A. (2018). Assessment of climate change impacts on climate parameters of Urmia Lake basin during 2011-2040 years by using LARS-WG model. Journal of Geography and Planning, 22(65), 265-285. https://geoplanning.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_8251.html
Kim, S., Shin, J.-Y., Lee, G., Park, J., & Sung, K. (2025). Future changes in precipitation extremes over South Korea based on observations and CMIP6 SSP scenarios. Water, 17(11), 1702. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17111702
Maleki-Morsht, R., Salahi, B., & Saber, M. (2025). Projection of future maximum temperature in northwestern Iran based on CMIP6 climate model outputs. Natural Hazards and Environmental Risks, 14(43), 1–18. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22111/jneh.2024.47321.2006
Nohani, E., Babaali, H., & Dehghani, R. (2025). Assessing the effects of climate change on river discharge using the CMIP6 model (Case study: Kashkan hydrometric station). Hydrogeomorphology, 13(46), 138-159. [In Persian] https://hyd.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_20755.html?lang=en
Oduro, C., Shuoben, B., Ayugi, B., Beibei, L., Babaousmail, H., Sarfo, I., … & Ngoma, H. (2022). Observed and Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 multimodel simulated changes in near-surface temperature properties over Ghana during the 20th century. International Journal of Climatology, 42, 3681–3701. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7568
Oyelakin, R., Yang, W., & Krebs, P. (2024). Analysing urban flooding risk with CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate projections. Water, 16(3), 474. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16030474
Qazizada, A. A., Omidvar, K., Mozaffari, G. A., & Mazidi, A. (2025). Detection of Climate Change Impacts on Precipitation and Temperature Parameters in the Kabul River Basin, Afghanistan Using the LARS-WG08 Model. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards14(2), 68-87. 10.22067/geoeh.2025.88181.1488
Rathjens, H., Bieger, K., Srinivasan, R., Chaubey, I., & Arnold, J. G. (2016). CMhyd user manual: Documentation for preparing simulated climate change data for hydrologic impact studies User manual, 1–17.
Rezaee, M., Nahtaj, M., Moghadamniya, A., Abkar, A., & Rezaee, M. (2015). Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and SDSM Methods in the Downscaling of Annual Rainfall in the HadCM3 Modelling (Case study: Kerman, Ravar and Rabor). Water Resources Engineering, 8(1), 25–40. [In Persian]  https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20086377.1394.8.24.3.9
Rezaei, H., Pashapour, H., & Sadeghi, F. (2024). Evaluation of CMIP6 model performance and projection of temperature and precipitation changes under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP) scenarios in Iran. Strategic Foresight, 3(10), 7–30. [In Persian] https://doi.org/20.1001.1.28212592.1403.3.10.1.5
Roshani, A., & Hamidi, M. (2021). Prediction of climate change scenario impacts on temperature and precipitation based on CMIP6 models (Case study: Sari station). Water and Irrigation Management, 11(4), 781–795. [In Persian]  https://doi.org/10.22059/jwim.2022.330603.920
Salahi, B., & Shahi, A. (2025). Ensemble Forecasting of Precipitation in The Caspian Region based on CMIP6 Multi-Model Output. Journal of Geography and Planning. [In Persian] https://geoplanning.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_20100.html?lang=en
Sanei-Thaless, F., Ghasemiyeh, H., Soltani, S., & Jafari, R. (2024). Evaluation of PDIR-Now satellite-based precipitation data in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. Modeling and Management of Water and Soil, 4(4), 151–166. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22098/mmws.2023.13436.1337
Sari-Sarraf, B., Rostamzadeh, H., & Mohammadi, N. (2024). Precipitation projection using CMIP6 models until the end of the 21st century in northwestern Iran. Geography and Environmental Hazards, 13(49F), 173–194. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2022.76646.1223
Sarkar, J., & Chicholikar, J. R. (2015). Climate Change Scenario in the Gujarat Region–Analyses based on LARS-WG (Long Ashton Research Station-Weather Generator) Model. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 12(2), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW-2015-12_2_05
Shahi, A., & Salahi, B. (2025). Precipitation parameter prediction in northern Iran based on selected CMIP6 models. Climate Change Research, 6(23), 77–94. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.30488/ccr.2025.522854.1284
Sharafati, A., Nabaei, S., & Shahid, S. (2020). Spatial assessment of meteorological drought features over different climate regions in Iran. Climatology, 40(3), 1864–1884. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6328
Vosoughi-Rad, L., Mirmousavi, S. H., & Asakereh, H. (2025). Evaluation of CMIP6 climate simulator models in estimating and forecasting precipitation at high-precipitation stations in Gilan province. Climate Change Research, 6(22), 1–22. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.30488/ccr.2025.488561.1255
Wang, H. (2024). Enhanced performance of CMIP6 climate models in simulating historical precipitation in the Florida peninsula. Climatology, 44(8), 2758–2778. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8495
Wang, L., Zhang, J., Shu, Z., Wang, Y., Bao, Z., Liu, C., … & Wang, G. (2021). Evaluation of the ability of CMIP6 global climate models to simulate precipitation in the Yellow River Basin, China. Frontiers in Earth Science, 9, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.689392
Yang, H., & Li, Z. (2025). Prediction and influencing factors of precipitation in the Songliao River Basin, China: Insights from CMIP6. Sustainability, 17(5), 2297. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17052297
Yang, X., Sun, W., Wu, J., Che, J., Liu, M., Zhang, Q., … & Wang, L. (2023). Evaluation and projection of precipitation in CMIP6 models over the Qilian Mountains, China. Remote Sensing, 15(17), 4350. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174350
Yassin, O., Nadhir, A., Mawada, A., Sadeq, B. A., & Sven, K. (2014). Expected Future ‎Precipitation in Central Iraq Using LARS-WG Stochastic Weather Generator. Scientific Research, ‎‎6, 948-959.‎
Zarrin, A., & Dadashi-Rudbari, A. A. (2020). Long-term future temperature outlook of Iran based on CMIP6 model outputs. Earth and Space Physics, 46(3), 583–602. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/jesphys.2020.304870.1007226
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 03 February 2026
  • Revise Date 21 April 2026
  • Accept Date 25 April 2026
  • Publish Date 22 June 2026