Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards

Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards

Predicting Wildfire Occurrence Risk in the Forests and Rangelands of Mazandaran Province by Comparing Regression and Machine Learning Models

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
Department of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
Abstract
Wildfire is a major driver of terrestrial ecosystem degradation, and its impacts have intensified in the forests and rangelands of Mazandaran Province due to climate change and human activities. This study assessed wildfire susceptibility and evaluated predictive model performance using four data-mining methods: Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Generalized Linear Model (GLM), Generalized Additive Model (GAM), and Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt), applied individually and in an ensemble framework. Climatic, topographic, vegetation, and human-related variables were used as model inputs, and performance was evaluated using the Area Under the Curve (AUC), True Skill Statistic (TSS), sensitivity, and specificity. Results showed that the ensemble model achieved the highest accuracy and stability, while MaxEnt performed best among single models. Variable-importance analysis indicated that Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and precipitation were the dominant factors controlling the spatial pattern of wildfire susceptibility, followed by elevation and slope. The highest susceptibility occurred in areas with moderate elevation, slopes greater than 35%, moderate to dense vegetation cover, and annual precipitation below 500 mm. The ensemble map showed a widespread and relatively uniform distribution of high-risk zones, confirming the multifactorial and complex nature of wildfire occurrence and highlighting the value of multi-model approaches for preventive and sustainable natural-resource management.
Introduction
Wildfires represent one of the most significant ecological hazards affecting Iran’s natural ecosystems, resulting from the combined influences of climatic conditions, vegetation characteristics, topographic complexity, and human activities. Global evidence indicates that climate change through reduced precipitation, rising temperatures, and increased soil and vegetation dryness has intensified both the frequency and severity of wildfire events. Over the past two centuries, forests worldwide have undergone extensive degradation driven by fire, and numerous studies have highlighted the pivotal roles of natural and anthropogenic factors in shaping landscape-level fire susceptibility. In Iran, wildfires have emerged a critical environmental concern, destroying thousands of hectares of forest annually and placing the country among the most affected in the region. The ecological consequences of wildfire include biodiversity loss, alterations in soil physical and chemical properties, accelerated erosion, and increased carbon emissions. Given these impacts, the application of remote sensing, geographic information system (GIS), and data-driven modelling approaches has become essential for predicting fire occurrence and generating reliable susceptibility maps. Previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of neural networks, statistical methods, and machine-learning algorithms in wildfire forecasting. Building upon this body of research, the present study aims to map wildfire susceptibility in Mazandaran Province, identify the most influential environmental drivers, evaluate the performance of individual and ensemble models, and determine the most accurate predictive framework. The study is based on the hypothesis that climatic factors exert a dominant influence on wildfire occurrence and that ensemble modelling provides superior predictive performance compared to single-model approaches.
Material and Methods
To develop the wildfire susceptibility map, spatially explicit records of historical fire occurrences were collected through field surveys. After removing spatial autocorrelation, the fire locations were randomly divided into training and testing subsets. Absence data were generated using a pseudo-absence approach guided by preliminary MaxEnt outputs to ensure representative background conditions. A comprehensive set of environmental predictors was compiled, including topographic, meteorological, anthropogenic, and vegetation-related variables. Elevation, slope, aspect, topographic wetness index, and distance to rivers were derived from digital elevation models and remote-sensing data. Climatic variables—temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, and wind speed were interpolated across the study area using geostatistical methods based on observations from 32 meteorological stations. Anthropogenic factors included distance to roads and settlements, while vegetation conditions and moisture stress were characterized using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and Temperature Vegetation Dryness Index (TVDI). Wildfire susceptibility across forest and rangeland ecosystems of Mazandaran Province was modeled using four data-driven approaches: Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Generalized Linear Models (GLM), Generalized Additive Models (GAM), and Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt). Model performance was evaluated using k-fold cross-validation, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and the true skill statistic (TSS). To reduce uncertainty and improve predictive robustness, an ensemble model was developed using AUC-weighted averaging of the individual models, and wildfire susceptibility was classified into five categories. Finally, the relative contribution of each predictor was quantified using game-theoretic Shapley values to identify the key environmental drivers of wildfire occurrence.
Results and Discussion
The results indicate that the models exhibited varying levels of performance in predicting wildfire susceptibility. Both the MaxEnt and ensemble models achieved excellent accuracy, with AUC values of 0.92 and 0.94, respectively. Among the evaluation metrics, the ensemble model produced the highest TSS value (0.74), reflecting a strong ability to distinguish between fire presence and absence. In terms of sensitivity, the GAM and ensemble models performed best, whereas the GLM and ensemble models exhibited the highest specificity. Variable-importance analysis revealed that vegetation, climatic, and topographic factors exerted the greatest influence on wildfire susceptibility. NDVI showed high importance in the GAM and MaxEnt models, while precipitation was identified as the dominant variable by the ANN and ensemble models. Elevation and other topographic attributes also played significant roles in fire occurrence and spread, whereas anthropogenic variables had comparatively weaker effects. Spatial patterns of wildfire risk varied among models but generally converged in identifying high-risk zones. The ensemble susceptibility map showed a widespread distribution of wildfire risk across the region, highlighting the multifactorial nature of fire occurrence. Response curves indicated that increasing NDVI is generally associated with higher wildfire probability, although this relationship weakens at very high NDVI values due to reduced fine fuel availability. Fire susceptibility was highest at moderate elevations and increased with slope, particularly on slopes exceeding 10%. An inverse relationship was observed between precipitation and wildfire susceptibility, with drier areas exhibiting the highest risk.
Conclusion
The findings demonstrate that ensemble modeling provides a robust and reliable framework for wildfire susceptibility mapping, outperforming individual algorithms in terms of predictive accuracy and spatial consistency. Wildfire risk in Mazandaran Province is controlled by a complex interaction among vegetation characteristics, climatic conditions, and topographic features, underscoring the need for integrated management strategies. The susceptibility maps produced in this study offer a valuable scientific basis for land-use planning, proactive fire management, and prioritization of high-risk areas, particularly given that preventive measures are generally more cost-effective and sustainable than post-fire suppression and restoration. Overall, this study emphasizes the importance of multi-model and systematic approaches for mitigating wildfire risk in ecologically sensitive landscapes, and the ensemble-based maps developed here can serve as effective decision-support tools for regions with similar environmental conditions.
Keywords
Subjects

©2026 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

Abedi, R. (2022). Application of multi-criteria decision making models to forest fire management. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 10(1), 84-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.02.005
Achu, A. L., Thomas, J., Aju, C. D., Gopinath, G., Kumar, S., & Reghunath, R. (2021). Machine-learning modelling of fire susceptibility in a forest-agriculture mosaic landscape of southern India. Ecological Informatics, 64, 101348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101348
Adab, H., Kanniah, K. D., & Solaimani, K. (2013). Modeling forest fire risk in the northeast of Iran using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Natural Hazards, 65(3), 1723-1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0450-8
Alimahmoodi Sarab, S., Feghhi, J., & Jabarian Amiri, B. (2012). Predicting the occurrence of natural fires in forests and ranges using Artificial Neural Networks (Case study: Zagros region, Izeh township). Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology, 1(2), 75-86. [In Persian] https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.24763128.1391.1.2.7.1
Allouche, O., Tsoar, A., & Kadmon, R. (2006). Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). Journal of Applied Ecology, 43(6), 1223-1232.
Azizianpour, S., Mirzaei, J., Omidipour, R., & Jafarian, N. (2025). Machine learning-based forest fire susceptibility prediction in semiarid oak forests of western Iran. ECOPERSIA 13(1), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.22034/ECOPERSIA.13.1.49
Bahadori, N., Razavi-Termeh, S. V., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., Al-Kindi, K. M., Abuhmed, T., Nazeri, B., & Choi, S. M. (2023). Wildfire susceptibility mapping using deep learning algorithms in two satellite imagery dataset. Forests, 14(7), 1325. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071325
Bountzouklis, C., Fox, D. M., & Di Bernardino, E. (2022). Environmental factors affecting wildfire-burned areas in southeastern France, 1970–2019. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 22(4), 1181-1200. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-1181-2022
Bowman, D. M. J. S., Moreira-Muñoz, A., Kolden, C. A., Chávez, R. O., Muñoz, A. A., Salinas, F., González-Reyes, Á., … & Johnston, F. H. (2019). Human–environmental drivers and impacts of the globally extreme 2017 Chilean fires. Ambio, 48(4), 350-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1084-1
Chouai, A., Laugier, S., & Richon, D. (2002). Modeling of thermodynamic properties using neural networks: Application to refrigerants. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 199(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3812(01)00801-9
Chuvieco, E., & Congalton, R. G. (1989). Application of remote sensing and geographic information systems to forest fire hazard mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment, 29(2), 147-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(89)90023-0
Denham, M. M., Waidelich, S., & Laneri, K. (2022). Visualization and modeling of forest fire propagation in Patagonia. Environmental Modelling & Software, 158, 105526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105526
Dimopoulou, M., & Giannikos, I. (2004). Towards an integrated framework for forest fire control. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(2), 476-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00038-9
Endreny, T. A., & Wood, E. F. (2003). Maximizing spatial congruence of observed and DEM-delineated overland flow networks. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17(7), 699-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/1365881031000135483
Eskandari, S., Pourghasemi, H. R., & Tiefenbacher, J. P. (2020). Relations of land cover, topography, and climate to fire occurrence in natural regions of Iran: Applying new data mining techniques for modeling and mapping fire danger. Forest Ecology and Management, 473, 118338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118338
Farahi Ashtiani, E., Daryaei, M. G., & Mohamadi Samani, K. (2013). Amin Amlashi, M., Review of fire sensitive areas with emphasis on drought impact with the joint use of PDSI, AHP and GIS (Case study: Forest Saravan, Guilan province). Forest and Range Protection Research 10(2), 83-110. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22092/ijfrpr.2012.11141  
Gholami, H., Mohamadifar, A., Rahimi, S., Kaskaoutis, D. G., & Collins, A. L. (2021). Predicting land susceptibility to atmospheric dust emissions in central Iran by combining integrated data mining and a regional climate model. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 12(4), 172-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2021.03.005
Ghorbanzadeh, O., & Blaschke, T. (2018). Wildfire susceptibility evaluation by integrating an analytical network process approach into GIS-based analyses. International Journal on Advanced Science. Engineering and Information Technology 6, 48-53.
Guisan, A., Edwards, T. C., & Hastie, T. (2002). Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecological Modelling, 157(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00204-1
Hamedi, N., Esmaeily, A., & Faramarzi, H. (2020). Analysis of the potential fire hazard scenarios using GIS and RS: A case study of Lordegan forests. Emergency Management 9(1), 17-27. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23453915.1399.9.1.2.5
Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (1987). Non-parametric logistic and proportional odds regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 36(3), 260-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/2347785
He, M. Z., Zheng, J. G., Li, X. R., & Qian, Y. L. (2007). Environmental factors affecting vegetation composition in the Alxa Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Environments, 69(3), 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.10.005
Hong, H., Tsangaratos, P., Ilia, I., Liu, J., Zhu, A. X., & Xu, C. (2018). Applying genetic algorithms to set the optimal combination of forest fire related variables and model forest fire susceptibility based on data mining models. The case of Dayu County, China. Science of The Total Environment, 630, 1044-1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.278
Janizadeh, S., Bateni, S. M., Jun, C., Im, J., Pai, H. T., Band, S. S., & Mosavi, A. (2023). Combination four different ensemble algorithms with the generalized linear model (GLM) for predicting forest fire susceptibility. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 14(1), 2206512. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2206512
Lasslop, G., & Kloster, S. (2017). Human impact on wildfires varies between regions and with vegetation productivity. Environmental Research Letters, 12(11), 115011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c82
Mambile, C., Kaijage, S., & Leo, J. (2025). Deep learning models for enhanced forest-fire prediction at Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: Integrating satellite images, weather data and human activities data. Natural Hazards Research, 5(2), 335-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nhres.2024.12.001
Mishra, B., Panthi, S., Poudel, S., & Ghimire, B. R. (2023). Forest fire pattern and vulnerability mapping using deep learning in Nepal. Fire Ecology 19(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-022-00162-3
Mohajane, M., Costache, R., Karimi, F., Bao Pham, Q., Essahlaoui, A., Nguyen, H., Laneve, G., & Oudija, F. (2021). Application of remote sensing and machine learning algorithms for forest fire mapping in a Mediterranean area. Ecological Indicators, 129, 107869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107869
Moradi, S., & Ahmadi Sani, N. (2025). Wildfire risk assessment and spatial zoning in forests and rangelands using GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making techniques in Central Zagros. Iranian Journal of Forest, 16(4), 531-554. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22034/ijf.2024.465288.1994  
Myerson, R. B. (2013). Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Harvard University Press.
Najafi, A., Irannezhad, M. H., Sotoudeh, A., Mokhtari, M. H., & Kiani, B. (2015). Modeling and risk mapping of forest fires using remote sensing and GIS (Case study: Baghe-Shadi protected area, Yazd province). Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology 4(14), 13-26. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijae.4.14.13  
Pham, B. T., Jaafari, A., Avand, M., Al-Ansari, N., Dinh Du, T., Yen, H. P., Phong, T. V., … & Tuyen, T. T. (2020). Performance evaluation of machine learning methods for forest fire modeling and prediction. Symmetry, 12(6), 1022. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12061022
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., & Schapire, R. E. (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190(3), 231-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
Polat, S., Ghasemi Aghbash, F., & Mahdavi, A. (2020). Forest fire hazard zone mapping in Ilam County forests. Forest Research and Development, 6(1), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.30466/jfrd.2020.120830
Pragya Kumar, M., Tiwari, A., Majid, S. I., Bhadwal, S., Sahu, N., Verma, N. K., Tripathi, D. K., & Avtar, R. (2023). Integrated spatial analysis of forest fire susceptibility in the Indian western Himalayas (IWH) using remote sensing and GIS-based fuzzy AHP approach. Remote Sensing, 15(19), 4701. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15194701
Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D. W. (1974). Monitoring vegetation system in the Great Plains with ERTS. Proceedings of the Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium, Greenbelt, USA; NASA SP-351.
Sandholt, I., Rasmussen, K., & Andersen, J. (2002). A simple interpretation of the surface temperature/vegetation index space for assessment of surface moisture status. Remote Sensing of Environment, 79(2), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00274-7
Sarkar, M. S., Majhi, B. K., Pathak, B., Biswas, T., Mahapatra, S., Kumar, D., Bhatt, I. D., … & Nautiyal, S. (2024). Ensembling machine learning models to identify forest fire-susceptible zones in Northeast India. Ecological Informatics, 81, 102598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102598
Sivrikaya, F., & Küçük, Ö. (2022). Modeling forest fire risk based on GIS-based analytical hierarchy process and statistical analysis in Mediterranean region. Ecological Informatics, 68, 101537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101537
Tessler, N., Wittenberg, L., & Greenbaum, N. (2016). Vegetation cover and species richness after recurrent forest fires in the Eastern Mediterranean ecosystem of Mount Carmel, Israel. Science of The Total Environment, 572, 1395-1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.113
Tuyen, T. T., Jaafari, A., Yen, H. P. H., Nguyen-Thoi, T., Phong, T. V., Nguyen, H. D., Van Le, H., … & Pham, B. T. (2021). Mapping forest fire susceptibility using spatially explicit ensemble models based on the locally weighted learning algorithm. Ecological Informatics, 63, 101292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101292
Wasserman, T. N., & Mueller, S. E. (2023). Climate influences on future fire severity: a synthesis of climate-fire interactions and impacts on fire regimes, high-severity fire, and forests in the western United States. Fire Ecology, 19(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-023-00200-8
Weise, D. R., & Biging, G. S. (1996). Effects of wind velocity and slope on flame properties Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 26(10), 1849-1858. https://doi.org/10.1139/x26-210
Zare Chahouki, M. A., Karami, P., & Piri Sahragard, H. (2022). Ensemble modeling approach to predict the potential distribution of Artemisia sieberi in desert rangelands of Yazd province, central Iran. Journal of Rangeland Science, 12(4), 326-340. https://doi.org/10.30495/rs.2022.685569
Zhang, G., Wang, M., & Liu, K. (2019). Forest fire susceptibility modeling using a convolutional neural network for Yunnan province of China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 10(3), 386-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-019-00233-1
Zhou, Z., Qiu, C., & Zhang, Y. (2023). A comparative analysis of linear regression, neural networks and random forest regression for predicting air ozone employing soft sensor models. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 22420. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49899-0
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 11 December 2025
  • Revise Date 12 February 2026
  • Accept Date 20 February 2026
  • Publish Date 22 June 2026