Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards

Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards

Flood Risk Assessment, Prediction and Zonation in the Kashafrud Basin Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
Department of Geomorphology & Meteorology, Faculty of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran
Abstract
Floods, as one of the most destructive natural hazards, cause irreparable damage to infrastructure and human communities on an annual basis. The present study aims to produce an accurate flood hazard zonation map for the Kashafrud basin by employing two advanced machine learning algorithms, namely Logistic Model Tree (LMT) and Random Forest (RF). In this research, thirteen influential parameters including elevation, curvature, precipitation, drainage density, aspect, soil and geological characteristics, slope, distance from streams, land use, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), topographic wetness index (TWI), and stream power index (SPI) were analyzed as input variables. Data corresponding to 145 recorded flood locations were identified and divided into training (70%) and validation (30%) datasets. Following the weighting of the thematic layers, flood susceptibility maps were generated and classified into five hazard classes using the natural breaks classification method. Model performance was evaluated using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, which indicated that the LMT model, with an AUC value of 0.897, exhibited higher predictive accuracy than the RF model, which achieved an AUC of 0.811. The flood hazard zonation results reveal that high-risk areas are predominantly concentrated in regions characterized by gentle slopes, impermeable formations, low elevations, and floodplains. Areas classified as very high and high risk are mainly located in the central and outlet sections of the basin. These findings not only confirm the effectiveness of machine learning algorithms in flood hazard zonation but also underscore the necessity of strategic management planning and targeted basin management practices in this flood-prone region.
Introduction
Floods are among the most significant and destructive natural hazards worldwide, annually affecting millions of people and causing severe damage to human life, critical infrastructure, agriculture, industry, and both urban and rural areas (Organization, 1999; Das, 2019; Daneshparvar, 2021). In recent years, climate change, rapid population growth, and accelerated urban expansion have contributed to increases in both the frequency and severity of flood events, underscoring the urgent need for effective flood risk management and mitigation strategies. The Kashafrud Basin, located in northeastern Iran, is particularly vulnerable to severe flooding due to its geomorphological characteristics, diverse geological structures, variable precipitation patterns, and intensive human activities. Effective flood risk management in this basin requires accurate identification of flood-prone areas, comprehensive analysis of influential factors, and the application of advanced modeling techniques. Accordingly, this study aims to identify and classify flood-prone areas within the Kashafrud Basin by applying machine learning algorithms specifically the Logistic Model Tree (LMT) and Random Forest (RF) to evaluate the relative contributions of both natural and anthropogenic factors within a data-driven scientific framework.
Material and Methods
In this study, 145 flood and non-flood locations were identified using data obtained from the Watershed Management Organization, complemented by satellite imagery interpretation. The dataset was randomly divided into two subsets, comprising 70% for model training and 30% for validation. Key explanatory variables, including land use, elevation classes, drainage density, lithology, slope, aspect, distance from waterways, rainfall, soil types, and vegetation and moisture indices (TWI, SPI, and NDVI), were derived from topographic maps, geological maps, and 2024 satellite imagery. All spatial datasets were processed and analyzed using ArcGIS 10.4 and ENVI 5.4 software, generating both quantitative and qualitative indicators for each variable.
To address potential multicollinearity among the independent variables, the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) and Tolerance (TOL) indices were calculated. Variables exhibiting high interdependence were excluded to enhance model reliability and predictive performance. Flood susceptibility modeling was conducted using two advanced machine learning algorithms: the LMT model, which integrates decision tree structures with logistic regression, and the RF model, which employs an ensemble of decision trees. Model performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, the Kappa coefficient, the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, and the Area Under the Curve (AUC). Flood hazard zonation maps were produced using the natural breaks classification method, and the model outputs were converted into thematic flood risk maps.
Results and Discussion
Multicollinearity analysis confirmed that none of the selected variables exceeded the threshold values (VIF > 10 or TOL < 0.1), indicating a robust and stable modeling framework. The results identified thirteen key factors including slope, elevation, curvature, distance from rivers, drainage density, rainfall, soil type, land use, and vegetation and moisture indices as significant determinants of flood risk. Areas characterized by low to moderate slopes and elevations below 1000 m were found to exhibit increased surface runoff velocity, thereby intensifying flood risk and severity, particularly in the central and outlet sections of the basin. Terrain curvature and dense drainage networks significantly influenced runoff concentration and flow pathways, highlighting the critical role of topography and drainage structure in flood dynamics.
Resistant geological formations and impermeable clay-rich soils substantially reduced infiltration capacity, leading to increased surface runoff and the occurrence of sudden and hazardous flood events. In addition, weak vegetation cover and inappropriate land use changes particularly urban and industrial development indirectly exacerbated both runoff volume and flow velocity. Low NDVI values reflected degraded vegetation conditions and a heightened susceptibility to flooding.
Flood hazard zonation maps generated using the LMT model indicated that approximately 81.23% of the basin falls within moderate to very high flood risk classes. Similarly, the RF model estimated that 68.44% of the study area is exposed to comparable risk levels, with high-risk zones predominantly concentrated in the central and outlet regions of the basin. Statistical validation demonstrated that the LMT model achieved higher predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.897) compared to the RF model (AUC = 0.811), although both models exhibited satisfactory and reliable performance for flood susceptibility assessment. High sensitivity, specificity, and Kappa coefficient values further confirmed the robustness and operational applicability of both modeling approaches.
The findings indicate that geomorphological and hydrological factors such as slope, elevation, drainage density, soil characteristics, and impermeable geological formations play a more dominant role in flood occurrence than anthropogenic factors, including land use and human-induced disturbances. Nevertheless, the influence of human activities on flood intensity and spatial distribution remains significant, emphasizing the necessity for integrated and sustainable watershed management strategies. These results are consistent with recent international studies, which highlight the primary contribution of natural variables to flood risk while acknowledging the amplifying effects of human interventions.
Conclusion
By integrating remote sensing data, GIS-based spatial analysis, and advanced machine learning algorithms, this study presents a comprehensive and innovative framework for flood risk assessment, analysis, and spatial zonation in one of the most critical watersheds in northeastern Iran. The results demonstrate that the LMT model outperforms the RF model in accurately identifying flood-prone areas within the Kashafrud basin. The resulting flood hazard maps provide valuable decision-support tools for prioritizing crisis management actions, land use planning, and the development of resilient water infrastructure.
While accurate consideration of natural and geomorphological factors is fundamental to effective flood risk management, regulating human activities such as land use planning, construction of flood resilient infrastructure, restoration of vegetation cover, and implementation of early warning systems is equally essential for minimizing flood-related damages. Emphasizing data-driven and machine learning based approaches, this research contributes to bridging the gap between applied scientific research and practical flood management needs in Iranian catchments. Future studies incorporating advanced algorithms, uncertainty analysis, and higher-resolution satellite data are strongly recommended to further enhance the resilience of aquatic and urban ecosystems.
Keywords
Subjects

©2026 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

Ahmadlou, M., Karimi, M., Shirzadi, A., Shahabi, H., Panahi, M., Rahmati, O., … & Pradhan, B. (2019). Flood susceptibility assessment using hybrid artificial intelligence models – Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) with metaheuristic algorithms. Natural Hazards, 99(2), 503–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03761-8
Alcántara, I., & Goudie, A. S. (Eds.). (2010). Geomorphological hazards and disaster prevention. Cambridge University Press.
Aldiansyah, S., & Wardani, F. (2023). Evaluation of flood susceptibility prediction based on a resampling method using machine learning. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 14(3), 937- 961. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2023.494
Asl, S. R., Rahman, A., & Tate, E. (2025). Social vulnerability correlates of flood risk to crops and buildings. Natural Hazards, 121, 8137–8158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07137-y
Azhar, M., Kane, B., & Vahedifard, F. (2025). Comprehensive portfolio of adaptation measures to safeguard against evolving flood risks in a changing climate. Communications Earth & Environment, 6, 824. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02779-z
Bakhtiari, M., & Jahantab, Z. (2022). Spatial modeling of floods using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and analyst functions of GIS. Journal of Climatological Research, 13(49), 177-194. [In Persian] https://clima.irimo.ir/article_120109.html?
Band, S. S., Janizadeh, S., Chandra Pal, S., Saha, A., Chakrabortty, R., Melesse, A. M., & Mosavi, A. (2020). Flash flood susceptibility modeling using new approaches of hybrid and ensemble tree-based machine learning algorithms. Remote Sensing12(21), 3568.
Bellu, A., Sanches Fernandes, L. F., Cortes, R. M. V., & Pacheco, F. A. L. (2016). A Framework Model for the Dimensioning and Allocation of a Detention Basin System: The Case of a Flood-Prone Mountainous Watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 533, 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.055
Brown, C., Green, T., White, R., & Black, K. (2024). Land Use Change and Its Impact on Flood Risk: A Remote Sensing Approach. Science of the Total Environment, 907, 168123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv. 168123
Cao, C., Xu, P., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Zheng, L., & Niu, C. (2016). Flash flood hazard susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and statistical index methods in coalmine subsidence areas. Sustainability, 8(9), 948. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090948
Ceresa, P., Bussi, G., Denaro, S., Coccia, G., Bazzurro, P., Martina, M., ... & Belikov, V. (2025). Large-scale flood risk assessment in data-scarce areas: an application to Central Asia. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences25(1), 403-428. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-403-2025
Chapi, K., Singh, V. P., Shirzadi, A., Shahabi, H., Bui, D. T., Pham, B. T., & Khosravi, K. (2017). A novel hybrid artificial intelligence approach for flood susceptibility assessment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 95, 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.019
Chen, L., Xu, Z., Li, J., & Huang, K. (2024). The Role of Terrain Curvature in Flood Hazard Assessment. Geomorphology, 445, 108987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108987
Chen, W., Li, Y., & Hong, H. (2021). Application of artificial intelligence models for flood susceptibility assessment: Comparative analysis and mapping. Catena, 196, 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.104818
Choubin, B., Moradi, E., Golshan, M., Adamowski, J., Sajedi-Hosseini, F., & Mosavi, A. (2019). An Ensemble Prediction of Flood Susceptibility Using Multivariate Discriminant Analysis, Classification and Regression Trees, and Support Vector Machines. Science of the Total Environment, 651, 2087–2096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.064
Costache, R., Arabameri, A., Blaschke, T., Pham, Q. B., Pham, B. T., Pandey, M., ... & Costache, I. (2021). Flash-flood potential mapping using deep learning, alternating decision trees and data provided by remote sensing sensors. Sensors21(1), 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21010280
Costache, R., Bui, D. T., & Pham, Q. B. (2020). Flood susceptibility prediction using machine learning, GIS, and remote sensing data: A comparative study of different models. Remote Sensing, 12(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12020205
Davis, M., Wilson, J., Taylor, A., & Evans, D. (2025). NDVI as an Indicator of Flood Vulnerability in Agricultural Landscapes. Agricultural Water Management, 276, 108098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108098
Debeljak, M. Dzˇeroski, Jopp, F., Reuter, H., & Breckling, B. (2009). Decision Trees in Scological Modelling in Modelling Complex Ecological Dynamics. Berlin Heidelberg, 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88010-7_11
Di Baldassarre, G., Montanari, A., Lins, H., & Van Loon, A. (2025). Geomorphological Controls on Flood Hazards: New Insights from Global Data. Earth-Science Reviews, 250, 104678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104678
Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., ... & Lautenbach, S. (2013). Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography36(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
Esfandiary Darabad, F.,  Rahimi, M., &  Pourmortaza, Gh. (2019). Flood zonation of Agerloo Cay Basin using the L-THIA method and fuzzy logic. Quantitative Geomorphology Research, 8(2), 155-171. [In Persian] https://www.geomorphologyjournal.ir/article_98653_en.html?
Fernández, D., & Lutz, M. (2010). Urban flood hazard zoning in tucumán province, argentina, using gis and multicriteria decision analysis. Engineering Geology, 111, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.006
Garcia, M., Martinez, L., Lopez, R., & Sanchez, P. (2025). Vegetation Cover and Flood Risk: A Global Meta-Analysis. Ecological Indicators, 146, 109789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.109789
Ghobadi, F., Khodashenas, S. R., & Mosaedi, A. (2019). Comparison of uniform rainfall method and alternative block method in estimating runoff collecting system in order to control flood in urban areas with ASSA software (case study: Chehel Bazeh Golestan Basin). Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage13(5), 1491-1503. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.20087942.1398.13.5.27.1
Hitouri, S., Mohajane, M., Lahsaini, M., Ali, S.A., Setargie, T.A., Tripathi, G., … & Varasano, A. (2024). Flood Susceptibility Mapping Using SAR Data and Machine Learning Algorithms in a Small Watershed in Northwestern Morocco. Remote Sensing, 16(5), 858, 1- 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16050858
Hong, H., Panahi, M., Shirzadi, A., Ma, T., Liu, J., Zhu, A.-X., … & Kazakis, N. (2018). Flood susceptibility assessment in Hengfeng area coupling adaptive neurofuzzy inference system with genetic algorithm and differential evolution. Science of the Total Environment. 621, 1124–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.114
Jied, L., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., & Chen, Q. (2025). Assessment of flood risk and vegetation dynamics using NDVI analysis in river basins: Integrating Landsat-9 data for improved hazard mapping. Remote Sensing of Environment, 314, 113924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.113924
Johnson, B., Lee, S., Kim, J., & Park, H. (2025). Geological Controls on Flood Generation in Urban and Rural Areas. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 50(4), 1234–1245. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5812
Khan, T. U., Nabi, G., Ullah, S., Akbar, A., Omifolaji, J. K., Achakzai, J. K., & Iqbal, A. (2025). Mapping flood resilience: a comprehensive geospatial insight into regional vulnerabilities. Frontiers in Water, 7, 1465505. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2025.1465505
Khosravi, A., Azhdary Moghaddam, M., Hashemi Monfared, S. A., & Nazaripour H. (2023). Comparison of Results of GIS-Based Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Remote Sensing Indicators in Kahir River Basin, Iran. Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazards, 9(4), 21-40. [In Persian]
Khosravi, K., Melesse, A. M., Shahabi, H., Shirzadi, A., Chapi, K., & Hong, H. (2019). Flood susceptibility mapping at ningdu catchment, china using bivariate and data mining techniques. In Extreme Hydrology and Climate Variability, Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815998-9.00033-6
Kron, W. (2002). Flood risk = hazard × exposure × vulnerability. In Proceedings of the Flood Defence 2002 Conference (pp. 82–97). Science Press.
Kumar, R., Singh, A., Sharma, P., & Gupta, R. (2025). Drainage Density and Flood Vulnerability: A Global Perspective. Hydrological Processes, 39(3), e14876. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14876
Lee, S., Kim, J., Jung, H., Lee, M., & Lee, S. (2017). -Spatial prediction of flood susceptibility using random-forest and boosted-tree models in Seoul metropolitan city, Korea, Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 8(2), 950-973. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1289250
Lee, S., Kim, Y., Park, J., & Choi, H. (2024). Topographic Wetness Index (TWI) and Flood Risk Assessment. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 29(3), 04024001. https://doi.org/10.1061/JHEND8.HYENG-1332
Li, K., Wu, S., Dai, E., & Xu, Z. (2012). Flood loss analysis and quantitative risk assessment in china. Natural Hazards, 63, 737–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0180-y
Li, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., & Chen, H. (2024). Impact of Slope and Elevation on Flood Risk: A Case Study in the Yangtze River Basin. Journal of Hydrology, 630, 129567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129567
Liu, J., Song, C., Wang, B., & Zhang, K. (2024). Hydrodynamic Modeling of Flood Risk Near River Channels. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 17(1), e12876. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12876
Luu, C., Pham, B. T., Trinh, P. T., Tran, V. T., Nguyen, H. D., Le, H. V., & Prakash, I. (2021). GIS-based ensemble computational models for flood susceptibility prediction in the Quang Binh Province, Vietnam. Journal of Hydrology, 596, 126080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126080
Malik, S., Chandra Pal, S., Chowdhuri, I., Chakrabortty, R., Roy, P., & Das, B. (2020). Prediction of Highly Flood Prone Areas by GIS Based Heuristic and Statistical Model in a Monsoon Dominated Region of Bengal Basin. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 19, 100343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100343
Marchi, L., Borga, M., Preciso, E., & Gaume, E. (2010). Characterisation of selected extreme flash floods in Europe and implications for flood risk management. Journal of Hydrology, 394 (1–2), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.002
Merz, B., Vorogushyn, S., & Apel, H. (2024). Natural vs. Anthropogenic Factors in Flood Risk: A Review. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 24(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1-2024
Mousavi Harami, R., Mahboubi, A., Khaneh Bad, M., Rezavand, N., Matinfar, H., & Sheibani, Y. (1990). Is it possible for the grain size in rivers to increase downstream? For example: Kashf-e Rud River located in the north of Khorasan Province, Fourth Conference of the Geological Society of Iran, Tabriz, 299. [In Persian]
Nedkov, S., & Burkhard, B. (2012). Flood regulating ecosystem services-Mapping supply and demand, in the etropole municipality, bulgaria. Ecological Indicators, 21, 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022
Ngo, P.  T. T., Pham, T. D., Nhu, V. H., Le, T. T., Tran, D. A., Phan, C. D., … & Tien Bui, D. (2020). A novel hybrid quantum-PSO and credal decision tree ensemble for tropical cyclone induced flash flood susceptibility mapping with geospatial data. Journal of Hydrology, 596, 125682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125682
Nguyen, H., Mehrabi, M., Kalantar, B., Moayedi, H., & Abdullahi, M. M. (2019). Potential of hybrid evolutionary approaches for assessment of geo-hazard landslide susceptibility mapping. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 10(1), 1667–1693. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2019.1607782
Organization of American States (OAS). (1991). Primer on Natural Hazard Management in Integrated Regional Development Planning. Organization of American States, Washington, D.C. http://www.oas.org/osde/publications/Unit/oea66e/begin.htm
Panahi, M., Dodangeh, E., Rezaie, F., Khosravi, K., Van Le, H., Lee, M. J., & Thai Pham, B. (2021). Flood spatial prediction modeling using a hybrid of metaoptimization and support vector regression modeling. Catena, 199, 105114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.105114
Park, K., Lee, J., Kim, S., & Han, D. (2025). SPI and Flood Prediction in a Changing Climate. International Journal of Climatology, 45(2), 876–890. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8345
Peng, L., Niu, R., Huang, B. O., Wu, X., Zhao, Y., & Ye, R. (2014). Landslide susceptibility mapping based on rough set theory and support vector machines: A case of the Three Gorges area, China. Geomorphology, 204, 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.08.013
Rahimpour, T., & Rezaei Moghaddam, M. H. (2025). Modeling the Flood Hazard Potential in the Aji Chai basin using Data Mining Algorithms. Environmental Erosion Research Journal, 14(4), 19-38. [In Persian] http://dx.doi.org/10.61186/jeer.14.4.19
Rahman, R., Dhruba, S. R., Ghosh, S., & Pal, R. (2019). Functional random forest with applications in dose-response predictions. Scientific Reports, 9 (1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38231-w
Rahmati, O., Zeinivand, H., & Besharat, M. (2016). Flood hazard zoning in Yasooj region, Iran, using GIS and multi-criteria decision analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 571, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.095
Rezaei Moghaddam, M. H., Haghighat, A., Rahimpour, T., & Behboody, A. (2025). Assessing the Effects of Land Use Change on Flood Occurrence in the Mordaq Chai Watershed Using the SWAT and Artificial Neural Network Models. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 14(3), 72-92. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2025.92648.1558
Rezaei, F., Arabameri, A., Chandra Pal, S., Saha, A., Blaschke, T., Pradhan, B., & Pham, Q. B. (2022). Novel hybrid models by coupling support vector regression (SVR) with meta-heuristic algorithms (WOA and GWO) for flood susceptibility mapping. Natural Hazards, 114(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05424-6
Roy, K., Kar, S., & Das, R. (2020). A primer on QSAR/QSPR modeling: Fundamental concepts. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31803-4
Sampson, C. C., Smith, A. M., Bates, P. D., Neal, J. C., Alfieri, L., & Freer, J. E. (2015). A high-resolution global flood hazard model. Natural Hazards, 75(1), 735–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1325-9
Smith, A., Johnson, M., Williams, E., & Davis, L. (2024). Soil Permeability and Flood Risk: A Comparative Study. Catena, 234, 107456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107456
Souissi, D., Zouhri, L., Hammami, S., Msaddek, M. H., Zghibi, A., & Dlala, M. (2020). GIS-Based MCDM-AHP Modeling for Flood Susceptibility Mapping of Arid Areas, Southeastern Tunisia. Geocarto International, 35, 991–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2018.1520924
Tarshizian, H., Aghabeigi, M., & Barzekar, A. (2007). Final report on the possibility of using abandoned canals for artificial recharge of groundwater (Mashhad Plain), Khorasan Razavi Regional Water Joint Stock Company. [In Persian]
Tehrany, M. S., Pradhan, B., & Jebur, M. N. (2015). Flood susceptibility mapping using a novel ensemble weights-of-evidence and support vector machine models in GIS. Journal of Hydrology, 522, 720–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.018
Ullah, I., Kovacs, G., & Lenner, T. (2025). Impact of climate change on flood risk with urban resilience perspective using fuzzy logic model. Earth Science Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-01202-9
Wang, H., Yang, S., Zhao, C., & Wu, T. (2025a). LiDAR-Based Analysis of Terrain Effects on Flood Dynamics. Remote Sensing of Environment, 301, 113245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2024.113245
Wang, S., Zhang, K., Van Beek, L. P., Tian, X., & Bogaard, T. A. (2020). Physically-based landslide prediction over a large region: Scaling low-resolution hydrological model results for high-resolution slope stability assessment. Environment Model Software, 124, 104607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104607
Wang, Y., Li, S., Jied, L., & Zhang, Q. (2025b). Integrating topographic wetness index (TWI) and machine learning algorithms to enhance flood susceptibility modeling in semi-arid basins. Catena, 237, 108056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2025.108056
Wang, Y., Zhao, G., Li, Z., & Zhang, D. (2025c). Assessment of flood susceptibility using topographic and vegetation indices integrated with machine learning approaches. Catena, 236, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.107121
Wing, O. E. J., Bates, P. D., Smith, A. M., Sampson, C. C., Johnson, K. A., & Erickson, T. A. (2018). Estimates of present and future flood risk in the conterminous United States. Nature Climate Change, 8(7), 620–625. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0160-6.
Wu, C., Qiao, J., Chen, W., Huang, B., & Hong, H. (2020). Comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping using machine learning models. Geoscience Frontiers, 11(3), 903–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2019.09.001
Zare, M., Azari, M., & Rezaei Arefi, M. (2024). Comparison of different multicriteria decision-making methods for prioritization of flood source areas in Kashafrood basin. Journal of
Geography and Environmental Hazards, 13
(4), 159-196. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2024.88777.1498
Zhang, K., Ruben, G. B., Li, X., Li, Z., Yu, Z., Xia, J., & Dong, Z. (2020). A comprehensive assessment framework for quantifying climatic and anthropogenic contributions to streamflow changes: A case study in a typical semi-arid North China basin. Environment Model Software, 128, 104704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104704
Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Li, D., & Zhao, R. (2019). Effects of soil texture and structure on infiltration and runoff: Experimental and modeling approaches. Journal of Hydrology, 575, 1174–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.023
Zhang, Y., Liu, Q., Gao, P., & Ma, J. (2025). Topographic Controls on Flood Generation in Mountainous Regions. Water Resources Research, 61(2), e2024WR032123. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR032123
Zhao, X., Wang, Y., Jied, L., & Chen, W. (2025). Enhancing flood hazard mapping by integrating Stream Power Index (SPI) and machine learning: A case study in monsoonal river basins. Geomorphology, 452, 110145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2025.110145
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 06 November 2025
  • Revise Date 28 January 2026
  • Accept Date 31 January 2026
  • Publish Date 22 June 2026