Examining the Role of Smart Cities in Enhancing Urban Resilience to Environmental Hazards (Case Study: Zanjan City)

Document Type : Applied Articale

Authors

Department of Geography, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

Abstract

With the expansion of urbanization and the intensification of environmental hazards, urban resilience has emerged as a key strategy for crisis management and sustainable urban development. At the same time, the concept of the smart city, grounded in advanced technologies, offers a promising framework for enhancing resilience against both natural and human-made risks. This study aims to analyze the role of smart city components in improving urban resilience in the city of Zanjan. The research adopts a mixed-methods approach. In the qualitative phase, key components were identified through theoretical analysis and validated using the Delphi method. In the quantitative phase, structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted using PLS software to examine the impact of the identified components on urban resilience. The results indicate that all dimensions of the smart city exert a significant and positive influence on urban resilience. Among them, smart transportation, data management and analytics, and smart infrastructure had the most substantial effects. The overall coefficient of the smart city's impact on urban resilience was calculated at 0.8846, highlighting the strong potential of this variable in enhancing Zanjan’s resilience capacity. Therefore, the findings underscore the importance of integrating advanced technologies into the policy and development programs of Zanjan, suggesting that the smart city can play a crucial role in shaping a resilient, adaptive, and sustainable urban future.




Introduction
In the contemporary era, alongside the accelerating trend of urbanization and the intensification of climatic hazards, cities face increasingly complex challenges in sustainability and crisis management. Zanjan, as one of Iran’s developing urban centers, is no exception and contends with issues such as flash floods, drought, land subsidence, and weaknesses in smart infrastructure. Under such circumstances, the concept of “urban resilience,” which entails a city’s capacity to confront, adapt to, and recover from crises, gains heightened importance. In this context, the emerging paradigm of the “smart city,” leveraging technologies such as the Internet of Things, big data, artificial intelligence, and advanced communication infrastructures, has been introduced as an effective tool to enhance urban resilience. The present study aims to investigate and elucidate the role of smart city components in strengthening the various dimensions of urban resilience in Zanjan against environmental hazards.
Material and Methods
This study adopts an applied research design with a mixed qualitative-quantitative approach. In the qualitative phase, through a review of theoretical and empirical foundations, the relevant components and subcomponents related to smart cities and urban resilience were identified. Subsequently, in the quantitative phase, to measure expert opinions and build consensus on selected indicators, a two-round Delphi method was employed with the participation of 35 specialists. For data analysis, statistical tests including mean, standard deviation, Kendall’s coefficient of concordance, and Chi-square test were applied. Furthermore, to evaluate the conceptual framework of the study and examine causal relationships among variables, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were utilized. The reliability of the questionnaires was confirmed by Cronbach’s alpha coefficients exceeding 0.7, and model fit was validated using indices such as SRMR, NFI, and d_ULS.
Results and Discussion
The findings indicated that out of an initial 48 indicators, 42 were confirmed by expert consensus and incorporated into subsequent analyses. In the factor analysis, all items exhibited factor loadings above 0.7, demonstrating the model’s high structural validity. Various smart city components) including smart transportation, data management and analytics, smart community, smart infrastructure, smart crisis management, and smart economy(each showed significant positive effects on different dimensions of urban resilience. Path analysis revealed that the greatest direct effect belonged to the smart transportation component with a path coefficient of 0.349 and a t-value of 8.64. This was followed by data management and analytics (β = 0.3081), smart community (β = 0.1855), smart crisis management (β = 0.1892), smart infrastructure (β = 0.1789), and smart economy (β = 0.1740), all of which had meaningful impacts on urban resilience. Overall, the total effect coefficient of the smart city on the resilience of Zanjan city was calculated as 0.8846, indicating a strong and direct relationship between these variables. The four dimensions of urban resilience) social, economic, institutional, and infrastructural (were well explained by the smart city components. Smart infrastructure played a crucial role in enhancing the city’s physical robustness; smart community contributed to raising awareness, participation, and digital literacy among citizens; smart data management and analytics optimized institutional decision-making; and the smart economy supported the city’s economic sustainability during crises. These results underscore that institutionalizing smart technologies within Zanjan’s urban structures can significantly improve the city’s resilience against environmental threats.
Conclusions
In summary, the study’s findings emphasize that urban development in the twenty-first century necessitates the intelligent integration of technology with sustainable governance. The results of this research can serve as a practical model for policymakers, urban planners, and crisis managers aiming to enhance urban resilience by leveraging smart city capacities. It is also recommended to take effective steps toward transforming Zanjan into a resilient and smart city through the expansion of digital infrastructure, enhancement of data literacy, and strengthening of a knowledge-based economy. Continuation of this trajectory requires multi-sectoral collaboration among government agencies, the private sector, universities, and civil society to prepare adequately for complex and forthcoming challenges.
Acknowledgements
With utmost respect and gratitude, I consider it my duty to thank and appreciate all the individuals who assisted me in conducting this research. Undoubtedly, this research would not have been completed without the support and guidance of esteemed professors, caring friends, and my respected family. Their constructive guidance and critiques played an effective role in improving the quality of this research. I also sincerely appreciate the institutions and organizations that provided the necessary data and information, thereby creating the necessary environment for a more accurate research process. I wish increasing success for all dear ones from the Almighty God.

Keywords

Main Subjects


©2025 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

 

 

Ahern, J. (2011). From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), 341–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of urban technology, 22(1), 3-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
Angelidou, M. (2014). Smart city policies: A spatial approach. Cities, 41, S3–S11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.007
Arup. (2014). City Resilience Framework. Rockefeller Foundation. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2252179
Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., ... & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics214(1), 481-518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2017). Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016
Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2013). Smart cities in Europe. In Creating smart-er cities (pp. 65-82). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global environmental change, 18(4), 598-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., ... & Davoudi, S. (2012). Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end?“Reframing” resilience: challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: resilience assessment of a pasture management system in Northern Afghanistan urban resilience: what does it mean in planning practice? Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? The politics of resilience for planning: a cautionary note: edited by Simin Davoudi and Libby Porter. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
Fotouhi, S., Hosseinian Rad, A., & Yazdani, S. (2025). Investigating the effects of smart city dimensions on urban resilience in Khorramabad. Journal of Economic Geography Research, e722498. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.30470/jegr.2025.2048851.1258
Ghoreishi, G. S., Parsi, H. R., & Nourian, F. (2020). An analysis of the theoretical domain of the resilient smart city and developing an application framework. Fine Arts Journal: Architecture and Urban Planning, 25(4), 55–69. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2021.329235.672671
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Nam, T. (2016). Smart cities and smart government: Assessing innovation and change. Government Information Quarterly.
Hashem, I. A. T., Chang, V., Anuar, N. B., Adewole, K., Yaqoob, I., Gani, A., ... & Chiroma, H. (2016). The role of big data in smart city. International Journal of Information Management, 36(5), 748-758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.002
Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? City: Analysis of Urban Trend, Culture, Theory. Policy, Action, 12(3), 303-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096802
IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
ISO 37122: 2019. (2019). Sustainable cities and communities – Indicators for Smart Cities. International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/69050.html
Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
Komninos, N. (2013). Intelligent cities: innovation, knowledge systems and digital spaces. Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203857748
Lall, S. V., & Deichmann, U. (2012). Density and disasters: economics of urban hazard risk. The World Bank Research Observer, 27(1), 74-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/23262822
Li, C., Sun, N., Lu, Y., Guo, B., Wang, Y., Sun, X., & Yao, Y. (2022). Review on urban flood risk assessment. Sustainability, 15(1), 765. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010765
Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The delphi method (Vol. 1975, pp. 3-12). MA: Addison-Wesley. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3150755
Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 207–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
Shahivandi, A., & Pourhasanzadeh, M. H. (2023). Explaining the components and indicators of smart cities affecting urban resilience against COVID-19: Case study of Shiraz city. Journal of Urban Planning Geography Research, 11(4), 257–277. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2024.369884.1895
Sharifi, A. (2016). A critical review of selected tools for assessing community resilience. Ecological Indicators, 69, 629–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
Sharifi, A. (2019). A critical review of selected smart city assessment tools and indicator sets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 1269-1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.172
Sharifi, A., & Yamagata, Y. (2018). Principles and criteria for assessing urban energy resilience: A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 60, 1654–1677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
Tahmasebi Moghadam, H., Heydari, M. T., Alibakshi, A., & Rasoulzadeh, Z. (2025). Analysis of Key Social Factors Influencing the Resilience of Zanjan City Against Natural and Environmental Hazards. Journal of Geographical Studies of Mountainous Areas, 5(4), 111-134. [In Persian] https://gsma.lu.ac.ir/article_722137.html
Tahmasebi Moghaddam, H., Ahadnejad Reveshty, M., Heydari, M. T., & Shoghli, A. (2021). Explaining the factors affecting social resilience against biological hazards with an emphasis on COVID-19 (Case study: Zanjan city). Geography and Environmental Hazards, 10(1), 1–19. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2021.67234.0
UNECE. (2022). Guidelines on People-first Public-Private Partnerships for the Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2022-10/ECE_CECI_WP_PPP_2022_06-en.pdf
UN-Habitat. (2020a). People-Centered Smart Cities: How smart can our cities be? https://unhabitat.org/programme/legacy/people-centered-smart-cities
UN-Habitat. (2020b). Smart Cities and Resilience: A Framework for Action. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/05/cityrap_tool_booklet_2020.pdf
Un-Habitat. (2022). World cities report 2022: envisaging the future of cities. UN.   https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/06/wcr_2022.pdf
United Nations. (2022). Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2022 Revision. https://population.un.org/wup/
Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Foth, M., Sabatini-Marques, J., Da Costa, E., & Ioppolo, G. (2019). Can cities become smart without being sustainable? A systematic review of the literature. Sustainable Cities and Society45, 348-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.033
Zheng, Y. (2019). Urban computing. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262039086/urban-computing/
Zhou, Y., & Wang, S. (2020). Smart city resilience against COVID-19: The role of big data and digital governance. Cities, 107, 102984. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912645
CAPTCHA Image

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 08 October 2025
  • Receive Date: 23 July 2025
  • Revise Date: 03 October 2025
  • Accept Date: 08 October 2025