Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards

Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards

Morphotectonic Analysis of the Sefidrood Basin, Iran: An Integrated Methodological Framework Based on the Fibonacci Sequence and Gamma Distribution for Identifying Active Structural Patterns

Document Type : Research Article

Author
Department of Geography, Faculty of literature and Humanities, University of Yasouj, Yasouj, Iran
Abstract
The Sefidrood Basin in northwestern Iran, located within the tectonically active Alborz–Central Iran transition zone, displays considerable structural complexity. This study employs mathematical and geometric patterns, particularly the Fibonacci sequence and the golden ratio, in combination with advanced statistical approaches such as the gamma distribution, the chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test, to investigate the morphotectonic and neotectonic conditions of the basin and its sub basins. Topographic and structural data were derived from maps and satellite imagery and analyzed using a GIS framework. A quantitative classification system based on Fibonacci ratios was applied to categorize the basin into five classes reflecting varying levels of morphotectonic activity. The results show that 96% of the basin lies within the range of weak to strong morphotectonic activity, whereas 4% is affected by neotectonic processes, primarily concentrated along the Qezelozan–Shahroud valleys, where neotectonic activity is most pronounced. Gamma based analysis confirms dynamic equilibrium with a skewness value of 0.7171 and a kurtosis of 0.782. The chi-square test indicates that the sub-basins behave independently with respect to morphotectonic activity, and Fisher’s exact test demonstrates that all sub-basins operate within a shared ergodic structural framework. The findings indicate the presence of a negative cybernetic system with exponential memory that is adjusting the basin toward its base level in the Caspian Sea.
Introduction
The Sefidrood Basin, a key sub-basin in northwestern Iran, features complex tectonic processes. Given its geographical and tectonic significance, identifying morphotectonic patterns and assessing its long-term equilibrium state are essential. This study adopt a Fibonacci-based geometric patterns and statistical analyses, including gamma distribution, chi-square tests, and Fisher’s exact test, representing Iran’s first integrated application of numerical approaches in morphotectonic analyses and distinguishing this work from prior studies.
Fibonacci sequences and the golden ratio (φ = 1.618) have been employed across disciplines, including architecture, geology, biology, and system modeling. In the Sefidrood Basin, these patterns serve as quantitative tools to identify potential zones of tectonic and neotectonic activity, differentiating this work from earlier qualitative assessments.
Material and Methods
A hybrid framework combines mathematical-statistical techniques with geomorphological analyses to evaluate the morphotectonic and neotectonic status of the Sefidrood Basin and its sub-basins. Key stages:
Data Collection: Topographic maps (DEM), field geological data, and 350 geospatial/elevation points were gathered and integrated in ArcGIS Pro to characterize tectonic features.
Fibonacci-based Classification: Morphotectonic data were categorized using Fibonacci ratios (0.236, 0.382, 0.5, 0.618, 0.764) to define five levels of tectonic activity, enhancing spatial pattern recognition.
Statistical Techniques: To address non-normality (right-skewed data), non-normal methods were employed: (1) Gamma distribution analysis for probabilistic modeling of long-term tectonic patterns; (2) Chi-square tests to assess independence between sub-basins and the main basin; (3) Fisher’s exact test to compare variability where appropriate.
PDF/CDF Plots: Probability density functions and cumulative distribution functions were generated from the gamma distribution to visualize tectonic activity distributions.
GIS-Based Spatial Analysis: Overlay of fault lines, tectonic indices, Fibonacci patterns, gamma curves, and PDF/CDF maps in ArcGIS Pro provided insights into spatial relationships among tectonic features.
Comparative and Inductive Analyses: Two sub-basins were analyzed in detail (inductive approach), with remaining sub-basins summarized in tables (comparative approach) to identify commonalities and differences.
Moment Analysis and Inference: Statistical moments (mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis) described the distribution of tectonic activity, enabling a robust characterization of the basin’s statistical structure.
Results and Discussion
The Sefidrood Basin shows a highly organized large-scale structure despite tectonic complexity. About 96% of the basin area falls within the weak-to-intense morphotectonic activity range, with 4% neotectonically active, concentrated along the Qezelozan–Shahroud corridor (Manjil Fault). This pattern aligns with regional tectonic models of Arabia–Eurasia convergence, suggesting a phase of relative tectonic quiescence.
Interpretations include a negative-feedback, memory-dependent dynamics driving long-term stability, and a heterogeneous, nonlinear regime with localized deformation. These findings have implications for spatially targeted hazard management.
Gamma-distribution results (skewness 0.7171, kurtosis 0.782; mean 1.45, second moment 0.27, SD 0.519) indicate a stable system with no signs of imminent morphotectonic instability, consistent with non-normal probability approaches highlighted by Khosin & Wang (2022).
Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests show sub-basins are statistically independent from the main basin (chi-square values 6.2–53; all within 99% CI), suggesting a shared underlying tectonic driver within an ergodic framework.
GIS maps identify the highest activity along the Qezelozan–Shahroud corridor and Manjil Gorge; Rudshur lies outside the 95% CI, indicating independence from Zanjanrood.
Validation results show a confidence level of 90.85% with a two-tailed error margin below 8.9%, supporting the reliability of the methods. The study advances Fibonacci-based and gamma-distribution approaches for morphotectonic analysis and offers a framework for sub-basin dynamics within a unified tectonic system, with implications for water resource management, urban planning, and hazard mitigation.
Conclusion
An innovative approach combining Fibonacci patterns and gamma statistics reveals a dynamic equilibrium in the Sefidrood Basin, with only 4% neotectonic activity concentrated along major fault zones. Sub-basins are statistically independent yet integrated within a larger ergodic system, indicating shared long-term tectonic control. Fibonacci ratios and gamma distributions provide effective tools for hazard-zone identification and tectonic modeling, offering a framework for future research in similar basins and suggesting multi-scale, and spatial modeling methods for seismically active regions.
Keywords
Subjects

©2025 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

Agard, P., Omrani, J., Jolivet, L., & Mouthereau, F. (2005). Convergence history across Zagros (Iran): Constraints from collisional and earlier deformation. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 94(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-005-0481-4
Allen, M. B., Ghassemi, M. R., Shahrabi, M., & Ashi, M. (2003). Accommodation of late Cenozoic oblique shortening in the Alborz range, northern Iran. Journal of Structural Geology, 25(5), 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141 (02)00064-0
Asadpour, A. (2018). Recovering the spatial structure and planting plan of Sa’ad al-Jang garden in Shiraz based on Trens Odanell’s memories [Spatial analysis of historical gardens]. Journal of Warm and Arid Architecture, 7, 23–42. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.29252/ahdc.2018.1421
Berberian, M. (1983). The southern Caspian: a compressional depression floored by a trapped, modified oceanic crust. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 20(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1139/e83-015
Berberian, M. (1995). Master “blind” thrust faults hidden under the Zagros folds: active basement tectonics and surface morphotectonics. Tectonophysics241(3-4), 193-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)00185-C
Berberian, M., & King, G. C. P. (1981). Towards a Paleogeography and Tectonic Evolution of Iran. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 18(2), 210–265. https://doi.org/10.1139/e81-019
Bililan, L., & Hassanpour Lamr, S. (2019). Geometric patterns and golden proportions: A common language of architecture and art in the historical village of Abyaneh. Journal of Warm and Arid Architecture, 9, 45–68. [In Persian] https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.26453711.1398.7.9.3.2
Doglioni, C. (1990). The global tectonic pattern. Journal of Geodynamics12(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-3707(90)90022-M
Feizolahbeigi, A., Lourenço, P. B., Golabchi, M., Ortega, J., & Rezazadeh, M. (2021). Discussion of the role of geometry, proportion and construction techniques in the seismic behavior of 16th to 18th century bulbous discontinuous double shell domes in central Iran. Journal of Building Engineering33, 101575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101575
Guest, B., Horton, B. K., Axen, G. J., Hassanzadeh, J., & McIntosh, W. C. (2007). Middle to late Cenozoic basin evolution in the western Alborz Mountains: Implications for the onset of collisional deformation in northern Iran. Tectonics26(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006TC002091
Hashemi Zarjabad, H., Ziaieniya, M. H., & Ghorbani, H. R. (2015). Revisiting the Analysis of Geometrical Principles and Golden Proportions in Shokatieh School. Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies, 5(9), 207–222. [In Persian] https://journals.basu.ac.ir/article_1296.html
Kalman, D., & Mena, R. (2003). The Fibonacci numbers—exposed. Mathematics Magazine76(3), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570X.2003.11953176
Khattab, M. A., Radwan, A. E., El‐Anbaawy, M. I., Mansour, M. H., & El‐Tehiwy, A. A. (2023). Three‐dimensional structural modelling of structurally complex hydrocarbon reservoir in October Oil Field, Gulf of Suez, Egypt. Geological Journal58(11), 4146-4164. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.4748
Makar, K., & Rubin, A. (2017). Learning about statistical inference. International Handbook of Research in Statistics Education, 261-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7_8
Marples, C. R., & Williams, P. M. (2022). The golden ratio in nature: A tour across length scales. Symmetry14(10), 2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14102059
Mehrnia, S. R. (2017). Identifying Spatial Patterns of Earthquakes in Western Iran Using the Fibonacci Method. Environmental Risk Management Journal, 4(3), 215–229. [In Persian] https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_64799.html
Memarzadeh, R., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Jahanshahlu, L., & Dehqan Toranposhti, A. (2022). Ranking Fire Stations Using Fibonacci sequence Technique: Case Study—District 10, Tehran. Operations Research in Engineering Applications (Applied Mathematics), 19(72), 99-122. [In Persian] http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jamlu.19.1.99
Mohajjel, M., & Fergusson, C. L. (2014). Jurassic to Cenozoic tectonics of the Zagros Orogen in northwestern Iran. International Geology Review56(3), 263-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2013.853919
Nassef, A. S. E. (2015). Fibonacci sequence and golden ratio in new formula of predicting cracks propagation in reinforced concrete tie. International Journal of Damage Mechanics24(8), 1214-1226. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201300077
Radfar, A., Chakdel, A. R., Nejati, A., Soleimani, M., & Taati, F. (2019). New insights into the structure of the South Caspian Basin from seismic reflection data, Gorgan Plain, Iran. International Journal of Earth Sciences108, 379-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-018-1659-x
Salehipoor Milani, A., Yamani, M., Moghimi, E., Lak, R., Jafarbigloo, M., & Mohamadi, A. (2018). Effect of The Urmia Lake level fluctuations Based on lake terraces sediments characteristics. Quantitative Geomorphological Research6(1), 1-20. [In Persian] https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22519424.1396.6.1.1.8
Scholz, C. H., & Aviles, C. A. (1986). The fractal geometry of faults and faulting. Earthquake Source Mechanics37, 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1029/GM037p0147
Scholz, C. H., Dawers, N. H., Yu, J. Z., Anders, M. H., & Cowie, P. A. (1993). Fault growth and fault scaling laws: Preliminary results. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth98(B12), 21951-21961. https://doi.org/10.1029/93JB01008
Sharma, V. (2009). Deterministic chaos and fractal complexity in the dynamics of cardiovascular behavior: perspectives on a new frontier. The Open Cardiovascular Medicine Journal3, 110. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874192400903010110
Stepanov, P. Y., & Gomanyuk, J. A. (2023). Mathematical modeling of seismic wave kinematics in complex media. Moscow University Geology Bulletin78(1), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0145875223010179 
Tiwari, J., Goswami, P. K., & Bhakuni, S. S. (2021). Pattern of active crustal deformation in a part of a lesser Himalayan Tectonic Window, Himachal Pradesh, India. Quaternary International592, 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2021.03.043
Turner, J. C. (1999). On Vector Sequence Recurrence Equations in Fibonacci Vector Geometry. In Applications of Fibonacci Numbers: Volume 8 (pp. 353-368). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4271-7_32 
Turner, J. C., & Shannon, A. G. (1998). Introduction to a Fibonacci geometry. In Applications of Fibonacci Numbers: Volume 7 (pp. 435-448). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5020-0_48
Waldron, J., & Snyder, M. (2020). Geological Structures: A practical introduction. https://doi.org/10.7939/r3-x15j-kd13
Yin, A. (2010). Cenozoic tectonic evolution of Asia: A preliminary synthesis. Tectonophysics488(1-4), 293-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2009.06.002
Yin, A., & Harrison, T. M. (2000). Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences28(1), 211-280. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.211
Ziaieniya, M. H., & Hashemi Zarjabad, H. (2016). The Golden Proportion and System of Islamic– Iranian proportions in Qaen Mosque. Journal of Maremat & Memari-e Iran, 6(11), 89-100. [In Persian] https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23453850.1395.6.11.7.0
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.