Explaining Strategic Crisis Management with Urban Resilience Approach (Case Study: The Worn-out Texture of Ahvaz City)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Saeid Amanpoor ¹
• Hasan Hosseini Amini ²
• Hossein Ebadi ¹

¹ Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

² Crisis Management and Passive Defense Researcher

10.22067/geo.v0i0.80239

Abstract

1 Introduction
Considering the area of crisis management in the textures and inner spaces of cities, especially worn-out textures and unfortunately low-strength materials and incompatibility with the urban transport networkis of great importance in times of crisis such as earthquakes. The main part of worn-out textures is often the primary and historical core of cities; on the one hand for a variety of reasons, includes properties that are regarded as the identity, wealth and heritage of the city and its inhabitants, and on the other, investment in these areas  would be economically viable. However, due to the lack of proper attention of the authorities and the lack of proper planning, these textures are plagued with problems such as reduced livelihoods among residents, social deviations, lack of services and facilities, poor user performance and so on. These problems are associated with physical exhaustion, including low pedestrian width and high maze, large number of buildings lacking provincial systems. The micro-erosion of buildings has increased the vulnerability of the tissues and has doubled the problems and unexpected issues during the unexpected events.
In recent years, disaster reduction agencies have focused much of their efforts on achieving a resilient disaster community in which earthquakes have priority over other disasters due to widespread damage and social anomalies. As societies have resilience to natural disasters, the present study aims at identifying and analyzing the factors affecting urban resilience in times of crisis, identifying the strengths and weaknesses, assessing the opportunities and threats during the hazards, and formulating an appropriate strategy to give resilience to the worn texture of the central core of Ahvaz.
2 Materials and Methods
This study is descriptive-analytical surveys and field studies are used to collect the required data. The statistical population of the study includes experts in the urban planning and architecture of Ahvaz Municipality. Therefore, to come up with a more comprehensive and fact-based view, questionnaires were distributed among the statistical population, and focusing on the experts’ views and opinions the data were collected to indicate the weighting of the indicators. The data were then analyzed using the SWOT model and the weaknesses, strengths, opportunities and threats within the desired range in times of crisis were identified.
3 Results and Discussion
The core resilience of Ahvaz City during the crisis is probably due to the tissue burnout and the presence of valuable historical, cultural and religious artifacts such as the designated Caravanserai, the Mahdian Balcony, the Swan Hotel, the Talibzadeh Mosque and the crossing of the Ahvaz Fault. Lack of attention to the crisis management in this area causes damages to the lower resistance blocks and housing, the damage to historical, cultural and religious monuments and buildings has caused a lot of physical damage to the inhabitants of the tissue in crises such as floods, earthquakes, storms, war. On the other hand, the central core of Ahvaz City, despite its high vulnerability during the crisis, has some potentials as well, such as the existence of railways, subways, taxis and bus stations, hospitals in the vicinity, enhancing relief in the area. The shortage of schools and educational places in the area makes the death toll lower during the crisis. Villas and open spaces can be used in various stages of crisis and relief. The diversity of ethnicities, religions, economic, historical values and the tendency for improvement and modernization in this area increases the officials' motivation to pay more attention to this area in times of crisis.According to the results of this study, the situation of crisis management and the resilience in the core of Ahvaz is in an aggressive-competitive position and in order to become successful we need to use the potentials of the core of Ahvaz and the opportunities effectively.
4 Conclusion
The results show that the situation of crisis management and resilience in the central core of Ahvaz is in an aggressive-competitive position. In order to increase resilience in the worn out core tissue of Ahvaz, the following is suggested:

Investigate the zoning of urban housing vulnerabilities, for example, in term of crisis management
Develop comprehensive and coordinated scientific studies to better understand and prioritize the subject and the types of risks facing in the study area
Increase coordination between the responsible organizations and develop programs aimed at enhancing the context and institutional relationships
Proper distribution of large scale business and production centers in relation to adjacent areas to reduce congestion in the study area
Establish a physical, spatial and communication link between the study area and the surrounding area by continuing to integrate the main neighborhoods to provide more effective relief in times of crisis
Finally, develop plans and programs aimed at raising the public awareness of the crisis and the various stages of crisis management

 

Keywords

• Crisis Management
• Resilience
• Worn texture
• SWOT Model
• Ahwaz city

---

References

احدنژادروشتی، محسن؛ قرخلو، مهدی؛ زیاری، کرامت اله؛ 1389. مدل سازی آسیب پذیری ساختمانی شهرها در برابر زلزله با استفاده از روش فرایند تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی در محیط سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی نمونه موردی: شهر زنجان. مجله جغرافیا و توسعه. 8(19). 198-171.

امیدعلی، اسماعیل؛ تقوایی، مسعود؛ بیدرام، رسول؛ 1393. بهسازی بافت‌های فرسوده شهری با رویکرد مدیریت بحران زلزله. فصلنامه تحقیقات جغرافیایی. 29(3) (پیاپی 114). 178-165.

آهنچی، محمد؛ 1376. مدیریت سوانح (سوابق، مفاهیم، اصول و تئوری‌ها). انتشارات مرکز آموزش و تحقیقات جمعیت هلال احمر جمهوری اسلامی ایران.

جهانشاهی، محمدحسین؛ 1382. بافت‌های فرسوده و مشکل‌ساز شهری. فصلنامه جستارهای شهرسازی. 4. 25-17.

داداش پور، هاشم؛ عادلی، زینب؛ 1394. سنجش ظرفیت‌های تاب‌آوری در مجموعه شهری قزوین. دو فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی مدیریت بحران. 4(2). 84-73.

رضایی، محمدرضا؛ 1392. ارزیابی تاب‌آوری اقتصادی و نهادی جوامع شهری در برابر سوانح طبیعی (مطالعه موردی: زلزله محله‌های شهر تهران). دو فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی مدیریت بحران. 2(1). 38-27.

رضایی، محمدرضا؛ حسینی، سیدمصطفی؛ حکیمی، هادی؛ 1391. برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی مدیریت بحران در بافت تاریخی شهر یزد با استفاده از مدل SWOT. دو فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی مدیریت بحران. 1(1). 44-35.

رضایی، محمدرضا؛ رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ حسینی، سیدمصطفی؛ 1394. سنجش و ارزیابی میزان تاب‌آوری کالبدی اجتماع‌های شهری در برابر زلزله (مطالعه موردی: محله‌های شهر تهران). مجله پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی. 47(4). 623-609.

رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ رضایی، محمدرضا؛ عسگری، علی؛ پرهیزکار، اکبر؛ شایان، سیاوش؛ 1390. تبیین مفهومی تاب‌آوری و شاخص سازی آن در مدیریت سوانح اجتماع محور (CBDM). فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا (مدرس علوم انسانی). 15(4) (پیاپی 72). 41-19.

شکیب، حمزه؛ مقدسی موسوی، علی؛ 1385. مدیریت بحران در پایتخت. دومین سمینار ساخت و ساز در پایتخت. دانشگاه تهران.

شهرداری اهواز؛ 1396. گزیده اطلاعات مناطق، نواحی و محلات شهر اهواز. معاونت برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه شهرداری اهواز.

فرجی، امین؛ قرخلو، مهدی؛ 1389. زلزله و مدیریت بحران شهری (مطالعه موردی: شهر بابل). فصلنامه جغرافیا. 8(2)5. 164-143.

فلاحی، علیرضا؛ جلالی، تارا؛ 1392. بازسازی تاب‌آور از دیدگاه طراحی شهری پس از زلزله 1382 بم. نشریه هنرهای زیبا. 18(3). 16-5.

محمدپور، صابر؛ زالی، نادر؛ پوراحمد، احمد؛ 1395. تحلیل شاخص‌های آسیب‌پذیری در بافت‌های فرسوده شهری با رویکرد مدیریت بحران زلزله (مطالعه موردی: محله سیروس تهران). فصلنامه پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی. 48(1). 52-33.

یزدی‌ها، الهه؛ داود پور، زهره؛ 1395. بررسی میزان تاب‌آوری ساختار کالبدی شهر با تأکید بر پدافند غیرعامل با استفاده از فرآیند تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی AHP (نمونه موردی: مناطق 1و 2 شهر قزوین). کنفرانس بین‌المللی مهندسی معماری و شهرسازی. تهران.

Adger, W. N., 2000. Social and ecological resilience: Are they related. Progress in Human Geography. Vol. 24. No.3. 347-364.

Bruneau, M., Stephanie E., Chang, Ronald T., Eguchi, George C. Lee., 2003. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra. Vol. 19. No. 4. 733-752.

Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E. and Webb, J., 2008. “A place based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters”, Global Environmental Change, No. 18 (4), pp. 598-606.

Davis, I., Izadkhah, Y., 2006. Building resilient urban communities. Article from OHI, Vol. 31. No. 1. 11-21.

Ferreira, T, M. Vicentem, R. Mendes da Silva, J. A. Costa, A., 2013. Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical urban centres: case study of the old city centre in Seixal, Portugal. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. Vol. 11. No. 5. 1753–1773.

Godschalk, D. R., 2003. Urban Hazard Mitigation: Creating Resilient Cities. Natural Hazard Review. No. 4. 136-143.

Kimhi, S., Shamai, M., 2004. Community resilience and the impact of stress: Adult response to Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanon. Journal of Community Psychology. Vol. 32. No. 4. 439–451.

Klein, R. J. N., Thomalla, F., 2003. Resilience to Natural Hazards: How Useful is this Concept. Environmental Hazards. Vol. 5. No. 1–2. 35–45.

Mayunga, J.S., 2007, “Understanding and Applying the Concept of Community Disaster Resilience: A capital-based approach”, A draft working paper prepared for the summer academy for social vulnerability and resilience building, pp. 22 – 28, Munich, ermany.

Mileti, D. S., 1999. Disasters by design: a reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC, 1-376.

Moe, T. L., Pathranarakul, P., 2006. An integrated approach to natural disaster management: Public project management and its critical success factors. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal. Vol. 15. No. 3. 396 – 413.

Paton, D., Johnston, D., 2006. Disaster resilience: An integrated approach. Springfield, Charles C Thomas Publisher.

Pelling, M., 2003. The Vulnerability of Cities: Natural Disasters and Social Resilience. London, Earthscan.

Pendall, R., Foster, K.A., Cowell, M., 2009. Resilience and regions: Building understanding of the metaphor. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society. Vol. 3. No. 1. 71-84.

Rashed, T., 2003. Measuring the Environmen-tal Context of Urban Vulnerability to Earthquake Hazards: An Integrative Remote Sensing and GIS Approach. UC Santa Barbara and San Diego State University.

Sapirstein, G., 2006. Social resilience: The forgotten dimension of disaster risk reduction. Jàmba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies. Vol. 1. No. 1. 54-63.

Twigg, J., 2007. Characteristics of a Disaster-Resilient Community: A Guidance Note. Version 1 (for Field Testing). Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre.