Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Earthquake Occurrences in Iran (1996–2024): A Vulnerability Assessment with a Focus on Urban Areas

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Geography and Urban Planning, Artment of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

Abstract

Earthquakes are among the most destructive natural hazards worldwide, causing extensive damage to human societies each year. Spatial and temporal analysis of this phenomenon plays a key role in identifying high-risk areas and guiding crisis management strategies. Due to its location on the active Alpine-Himalayan seismic belt, Iran is one of the most earthquake-prone countries in the world, with over 1,150 fatal earthquakes recorded in the past century. This study aimed to identify the spatial and temporal patterns of earthquakes in Iran from 1996 to 2024 using data from more than 10,000 seismic events (M ≥ 4), analyzed using GIS tools. Methods employed included Kernel Density Estimation, Getis-Ord Gi* hot spot analysis, and Local Moran’s I index. Results revealed that the highest concentrations and clustering of earthquakes were observed in the western and southwestern regions, especially along the Zagros and Alborz faults. Furthermore, 59% of Iranian cities lie within 14 km of earthquake epicenters, with cities such as Zarand, Khormuj, and Kazeroon facing very high seismic risk. The study's innovation lies in its nationwide scale and the integration of extensive datasets with advanced spatial models. The findings provide critical insights to support urban retrofitting, disaster risk reduction policies, and enhanced resilience in earthquake-prone areas.
Introduction
Earthquakes are among the most devastating natural disasters, causing significant human and financial losses worldwide. Iran, located in the seismically active Alpine-Himalayan belt, has experienced numerous destructive earthquakes due to its complex tectonic structure. The country's vulnerability to earthquakes is further exacerbated by rapid urbanization, poor building standards, and a high concentration of population in high-risk areas.
Since 1996, more than 10,000 earthquakes (magnitude ≥ 4.0) have been recorded in Iran, with a significant portion occurring in the Zagros, Alborz, and eastern regions. The spatial and temporal analysis of earthquakes is essential for understanding their patterns and developing effective risk reduction strategies. Despite extensive studies on earthquake hazards, comprehensive research integrating spatial and temporal trends at a national scale remains scarce. This study seeks to address this gap by analyzing the spatial distribution and temporal occurrence of earthquakes in Iran from 1996 to 2024.
The key objectives of this research include:

Identifying high-risk seismic zones based on historical earthquake data.
Analyzing the relationship between seismic events and active fault lines.
Assessing the vulnerability of urban areas to earthquake hazards.


Providing insights for earthquake risk mitigation and urban planning policies.

Using GIS-based spatial analysis methods, this study evaluates earthquake clusters, density patterns, and their correlation with urban centers and fault zones. The findings contribute to a better understanding of seismic hazards in Iran and offer valuable recommendations for improving disaster preparedness and resilience in urban areas.
Material and Methods
Earthquakes are among the most devastating natural disasters, causing significant human and financial losses. Iran, located in the Alpine-Himalayan belt, has experienced frequent seismic activity due to its complex tectonic structure. Since 1996, more than 10,000 earthquakes (magnitude ≥ 4.0) have been recorded, mostly in the Zagros, Alborz, and eastern regions. Rapid urbanization, poor building standards, and dense populations in high-risk areas exacerbate the vulnerability. This study analyzes the spatial and temporal distribution of earthquakes in Iran (1996–2024) to identify high-risk zones, assess urban vulnerability, and provide insights for risk mitigation. Using GIS-based methods, we evaluate earthquake clusters, density patterns, and their correlation with fault zones.
This research adopts a quantitative approach using spatial analysis techniques. Earthquake data (magnitude ≥ 4.0) were obtained from the Iranian Seismological Center and processed in ArcGIS. Fault line maps and urban population data were integrated into a GIS framework. Spatial methods such as Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) identified high-risk zones, Getis-Ord Gi* detected seismic clusters, and Buffer Analysis assessed city proximity to faults. Moran’s, I measured clustering patterns. The results highlight seismic hazard variations and provide guidance for urban planning strategies to enhance disaster resilience.
Results and Discussion
The results indicate that seismic activity is highly concentrated in western, northwestern, and southwestern Iran, particularly along the Zagros and Alborz fault lines. Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) revealed that the highest earthquake densities occurres in the provinces of Hormozgan, Kerman, Fars, and Bushehr. Getis-Ord Gi* analysis identified significant seismic hot spots in these regions, confirming their high-risk status. Buffer Analysis showed that nearly 59% of major Iranian cities are within 40 km of an earthquake epicenter, with cities like Zarand, Khormuj, Ravar, and Kazeroon being particularly vulnerable. Additionally, 73% of recorded earthquakes occurred at depths of less than 15 km, increasing the likelihood of severe damage in urban areas.
The findings align with previous studies, which highlight the active seismicity of western and southern Iran due to major fault systems. However, some discrepancies were observed, such as the lower-than-expected earthquake density in northeastern Iran, possibly due to variations in data collection periods and methodologies. These results emphasize the urgent need for stricter construction regulations, seismic hazard zoning, and the integration of GIS-based monitoring systems to enhance disaster preparedness and resilience.
Future research should incorporate geotechnical factors, historical seismic patterns, and predictive modeling using artificial intelligence for improved risk assessment and mitigation strategies.
Conclusion
This study analyzed the spatial and temporal distribution of earthquakes in Iran from 1996 to 2024 (Gregorian calendar) to identify high-risk zones and assess urban vulnerability. The findings revealed that seismic activity is concentrated in western, northwestern, and southwestern regions, particularly along the Zagros and Alborz fault lines. Approximately 59% of major Iranian cities are within 40 km of an earthquake epicenter, increasing their risk of damage. Additionally, the majority of earthquakes occurred at shallow depths, further intensifying their impact on urban areas.
The results underscore the necessity for stricter construction regulations, enhanced seismic hazard zoning, and the integration of GIS-based monitoring systems to improve disaster preparedness. Implementing early warning systems, strengthening infrastructure, and promoting public awareness campaigns are crucial steps toward reducing earthquake risks.
Future research should focus on incorporating geotechnical assessments, historical seismic trends, and predictive modeling using artificial intelligence to enhance earthquake hazard mitigation strategies. By adopting a data-driven approach, policymakers and urban planners can develop more effective disaster risk management plans, ultimately increasing the resilience of Iranian cities against seismic hazards. 

Keywords

Main Subjects


©2025 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)

Afifi, M. E. (2020). Earthquake spatial statistics analysis and its adaptation to faults and quaternary loess sediments using GIS (Case of study Khuzestan province). Regional Planning, 10(38), 179-190. [In Persian] https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jzpm/Article/1157929
Alden, A. (2017). How many strong earthquakes occur annually? ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/geologic-maps-of-the-united-states-4122863?
Azadeh, S. R., Taghvaei, M. (2017). Spatial analysis of vulnerability in urban and rural settlements against earthquake hazard Case Study: Guilan Province. Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazards, 4(3), 71-84. [In Persian] http://jsaeh.khu.ac.ir/article-1-2750-fa.html
Bahrehvar, H., Asgharizamani, A., & Feizizadeh, B. (2023). Comparative comparison and leveling of physical-environmental resilience of urban fabric in ten districts of Tabriz city in against earthquake using spatial analysis-decision-making combined models. Remote Sensing and GIS Applications in Environmental Sciences, 2(5), 77-55. [In Persian]  https://rsgi.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_16444.html
Ganjaeian, H. (2023). Analysis of the tectonic status of the northwestern Zagros anticlines and its relationship with seismic centers. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 12(4), 275-290. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2022.75370.1182
Ganjaeian, H. (2024). Spatial and temporal analysis of earthquakes in Iran During the years 1907 to 2023. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 13(4), 222-243. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2024.87246.1470
Gulati, B. (2006). Earthquake risk assessment of buildings: applicability of HAZUS in Dehradun, India. Enschede, ITC109. https://purl.utwente.nl/essays/101997
Hadiani, Z., Hosseini, S. A., & Biabani, F. (2021). Identification and Evaluation of Physical Development Opportunities of Earthquake of Hajiabad City, Zirkuh Township. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 8(26), 191-213. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22080/usfs.2021.3124
Hashemi, S. N. (2022). Statistical Modeling of the Migrating Pattern of the Occurrence of Successive Earthquakes in the Zagros Region. Bulletin of Earthquake Science and Engineering, 8(4). 93-103. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.48303/bese.2021.243812
Heidarifar, M. R., & Mahmoudi, A. (2021). Analysis of Javanrud Urban Land Use Vulnerability to Earthquake, Using Network Analysis (ANP) and Geographic Information System (GIS). Human Geography Research, 53(1), 119-137. [In Persian]  https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2019.279271.1007898
Hough, S. E. (2021). Contributed reports of widely felt earthquakes in California, United States: If they felt it, did they report it?. Frontiers in Earth Science9, 770445. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.770445
Lajmorak, M., & Piri, Z. (2023). Landslide hazard zoning using Hierarchical Analysis Process (AHP) Model and GIS technology (Case study: Baghmalek County). Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 12(3), 193-215. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2022.77009.1239
Liu, Y., Zheng, J., Lu, H., & Li, X. (2022). Vulnerability assessment and spatio-temporal dynamics analysis of agricultural flood in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science10, 902968. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.902968
Maleki, S., Amanpour, S., Shojaeeyan, A., & Razavii, M. (2020). Surveying and measuring the physical and social resilience to earthquakes (Case study of Izeh City). Urban Structure and Function Studies7(22), 81-111. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22080/usfs.2019.15917.1743
Najafi Kani, A. (2021). Analyzing the Resilience of Rural Settlements against Earthquakes: A Case Study of Mountainous and Plain Villages of Amol County in Iran. Village and Development24(3), 172-196. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.30490/rvt.2020.342639.1212
Nazari Bayatiani, F., Jafar Beglou, M., Mohammad Khan, S., & Maghsoudi, M. (2022). Landslide Hazard Zonation in Kolur Region Using Bayes' Theorem-ANP Hybrid Model. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards11(2), 1-21. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2021.69988.1048
O'Keefe, P., Westgate, K., & Wisner, B. (1976). Taking the Naturalness Out of Natural Disasters. Nature, 260(5552), 566-567. https://doi.org/10.1038/260566a0
Oulahen, G., Mortsch, L., O’Connell, E., Harford, D., & Rutledge, A. (2019). Local practitioners’ use of vulnerability and resilience concepts in adaptation to flood hazards. Climatic Change, 153(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02386-w
Parizi, S. M., Taleai, M., & Sharifi, A. (2022). A GIS‑Based Multi‑Criteria Analysis Framework to Evaluate Urban Physical Resilience against Earthquakes. Sustainability, 14(9), 5034.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095034
Pashapour, H., Ghorbani, R., Farhadi, E., & Daroudinia, A. (2019). Zoning the Hazards of Earthquake Using Geographical Information System (A Case Study of Tabriz Metropolis). Environmental Based Territorial Planning (Amayesh), 12(45), 49-70. [In Persian] https://journals.iau.ir/article_668103.html
Paton, D., & Johnston, D. (2017). Disaster resilience: an integrated approach. Charles C Thomas Publisher. https://www.ccthomas.com/details.cfm?P_ISBN13=9780398091699
Rashed, T., Weeks, J., Couclelis, H., & Herold, M. (2007). An integrative GIS and remote sensing model for place-based. Integration of GIS and Remote Sensing, 199. https://B2n.ir/p60774
Rusydi, H., Effendi, R., & Rahmawati, R. (2017). Vulnerability zoning of earthquake disaster of Palu. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 1(2), 137-143. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v1i2.5138
Smith, K., Fearnley, C. J., Dixon, D., Bird, D. K., & Kelman, I. (2023). Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351261647
Taroni, M., Petrillo, G., & Lippiello, E. (2025). Earthquake Size Distributions of Strong Worldwide Seismicity Are Similar for Background and Triggered Events. Seismological Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220240481
Tian, Q., Zhang, S., Yu, H., & Cao, G. (2019). Exploring the factors influencing business model innovation using grounded theory: The case of a Chinese high-end equipment manufacturer. Sustainability11(5), 1455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051455
Xofia, M., Ferreira, T. M., Domingues, J. C., Santos, P. P., Pereira, S., Oliveira, S. C., … & Lourenço, P. B. (2024). On the seismic vulnerability assessment of urban areas using Census data: The Lisbon Metropolitan Area as a pilot study area. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 28(1), 242–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2023.2197078
Zheng, B., Bi, G., Liu, H., & Lowry, P. B. (2020). Corporate crisis management on social media: A morality violations perspective. Journal of Heliyon, 6(7), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04435
CAPTCHA Image