Wildfire risk modeling using remote sensing methods and fire behavior simulation in Guilan province

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Roghayeh Jahdi ¹
• Mohammad Vasegh Alhaj khalaf ²

¹ Associate Professors in Forest Sciences, Department of Forest Science and Engineering, Faculty of of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran

² PhD. Student in Forestry, Department of Forestry, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

10.22067/geoeh.2024.86597.1462

Abstract

Extended Abstract
Introduction
In Iran, various fire spread models have been used to predict fire behavior and spread at regional and local scales (Alhaj Khalaf, Shataee Joibary, Jahdi & Bacciu, 2021; Jahdi, Salis, Alcasena & Del Giudice, 2023). However, the calculation of an integrated fire risk index using these fire spread models has not yet been conducted. Typically, fire risk assessments are based on a set of fire spread descriptors that are used to map fire-prone areas and identify the most appropriate fire and fuel management measures in line with predefined goals (e.g., reducing fire intensity or minimizing fire size).
Fire and fuel management involves a comprehensive approach that integrates land management practices, considering fire regimes, impacts, values at risk, and multiple resource use activities. Despite the merits of each approach, limited resources often prevent the implementation of management measures in all areas with significant fire risk. Therefore, it is essential to prioritize high-risk areas and identify appropriate management strategies that maximize ecosystem protection. This study aims to develop an integrated method for identifying areas with the highest fire risk in the forests and rangelands of Guilan Province. The method combines simulation models of fire spread with landscape data (topography and fuel), fire weather conditions, and historical ignition point data. Additionally, anthropogenic factors, such as proximity to roads and settlements, are included in the fire risk modeling process, given their significant influence on fire behavior and regimes (Twidwell et al., 2016). The results of this research can support land-use planning, management, and future studies on fire hazards.
Materials and Methods
Study Area: This research was conducted in Guilan Province, which spans 1,404,400 hectares in northern Iran. The area ranges from -74 meters in the north to approximately 3,700 meters in the southeast. The province receives an average of 1,100 mm of annual rainfall, and the relative humidity averages 80%, decreasing during the summer months with 185 mm of rainfall during this period.
Methods:
Three Landsat-8 OLI/TIRS L1TP images from October 2021 were used to identify the main land cover types and produce a land cover map of the study area using ENVI 5.6 software. A map of surface fuel models was created by assigning local fuel models (Jahdi et al., 2020, 2023) and standard fuel models (Scott & Burgan, 2005) to the land cover types. Additionally, a vegetation density map and forest canopy density map (in percentage) for 2021 were generated from Landsat-8 images using the FCD model in ENVI software.
Historical fire ignition data were used to calculate ignition probability by interpolating ignition points using the Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) algorithm with a fixed radius of 5 km. The frequency of fire recurrence was determined from historical fire perimeters. Weather data, including temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and wind direction, were collected for the fire season in the study area.
To prepare input data for fire risk modeling:

FlamMap 6 fire simulator (Finney, 2006) was used to model fire behavior, including fireline intensity and fire rate of spread, at a 100-meter resolution across the study area.
Raster maps showing Euclidean distance from roads and settlements were created using ArcMap 10.8 software.
Kernel density estimation was applied to convert the historical ignition point map into a fire density raster map.

The fireline intensity, fire rate of spread, human factor maps, and fire history maps were rescaled to values between 0 and 1. These layers were combined to calculate the fire risk index (Xofis, Konstantinidis, Papadopoulos & Tsiourlis, 2020). The fire risk index values ranged from 0 (low risk) to 1 (highest risk).
Results and Discussion
Fifteen land cover classes were identified in the study area (Fig. 2, Table 4). The overall accuracy of the classification was 91%, with a Kappa statistic of 0.88. Dense broadleaf forest (30.6%) and orchard-irrigation farming (26%) were the dominant land cover types. Approximately 65% of the study area comprised natural forests, plantations, woodlands, shrublands, and rangelands. The remaining area included agricultural lands, built-up areas, water bodies, and bare lands.
Based on the simulation outputs for fireline intensity and fire rate of spread (Fig. 4):

In over 93% of the study area, the fire rate of spread did not exceed 0.25, and less than 7% of the area had higher values.
Similarly, in over 90% of the area, the fireline intensity remained below 0.25, with about 10% exceeding this threshold.
The highest values for fireline intensity and fire rate of spread were observed at high altitudes with dense vegetation, consistent with findings by Okano & Yamano (2015), which showed topography and slope significantly influenced fire behavior in broadleaf forests.

Human factors, such as proximity to roads and the fire kernel density/fire history (Fig. 5), were found to impact a smaller proportion of the study area. This finding aligns with the study by Xofis et al. (2020).
The integration of these components (Fig. 4 and Fig. 5) produced the final fire risk index map (Fig. 6). Fire risk values ranged from 0.0 to 0.68, with an average value of 0.11. Lowlands covered by non-burnable fuel models had the lowest risk (0.0), while the highest fire risk values were observed in the highlands with dense forest cover.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates how landscape information (topography and fuel), weather conditions, and historical fire data, combined with human factors, can be used to estimate fire risk spatially using fire behavior modeling. Moderate and high-risk areas account for 21% of Guilan Province, where fire management efforts should be prioritized. Specific measures include:

Strengthening fire prevention infrastructure.
Conducting fire prevention training to raise public awareness.
Enhancing ecosystem resilience in vulnerable areas.

While many fires remain random and difficult to fully control, estimating fire risk and developing prediction models can help mitigate fire hazards, reduce potential damages, and improve the allocation of fire prevention resources.

Keywords

• Fire Risk Index
• Fire Behavior Modeling
• Anthropogenic Fire Factors
• Ecosystem Resilience
• Gilan Province
• Iran

Main Subjects

• Fire

---

References

 Abed, H., Sahraeyan, F., & Rezaei, P. (2016). The Effects of Garmesh Wind on Weather Conditions of Rasht Synoptic Weather Station. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 4(2), 59-76. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/geo.v4i2.29820

Alcasena, F., Ager, A., Le Page, Y., Bessa, P., Loureiro, C., & Oliveira, T. (2021). Assessing Wildfire Exposure to Communities and Protected Areas in Portugal. Fire, 4, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire4040082

Alhaj Khalaf, M. W., Shataee Joibary, S., Jahdi, R., & Bacciu, V. (2021). Improved forest fire spread mapping by developing custom fire fuel models in replanted forests in Hyrcanian forests, Iran. Forest Systems, 30(2), e008. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2021302-17980

Awad, M., & Khanna, R. (2015). Support Vector Machines for Classification. In Efficient Learning Machines. Apress, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9_3

Byram, G. M. (1959). Combustion of forest fuels. Forest Fire Control and Use, 61 - 89.

Calkin, D. E., Ager, A. A., & Gilbertson-Day, J. (2010). Wildfire risk and hazard: procedures for the first approximation. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-235. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.

Catry, F. X., Rego, F. C., Bação, F. L., & Moreira, F. (2009). Modeling and mapping wildfire ignition risk in Portugal. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 18(8), 921-931. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF07123

De Cáceres, M., Martin StPaul, N., Turco, M., Cabon, A., & Granda, V. (2018). Estimating daily meteorological data and downscaling climate models over landscapes. Environmental Modelling & Software, 108, 186-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.003

Dorph, A., Marshall, E., Parkins, K. A., & Penman, T. D. (2022). Modelling ignition probability for human- and lightning-caused wildfires in Victoria, Australia. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 22, 3487–3499. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3487-2022.

Evers, C., Holz, A., Busby, S., & Nielsen-Pincus, M. (2022). Extreme Winds Alter Influence of Fuels and Topography on Megafire Burn Severity in Seasonal Temperate Rainforests under Record Fuel Aridity. Fire, 5, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire5020041

Finney, M. A. (2004). FARSITE, Fire Area Simulator--model development and evaluation . US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.

Finney, M. A. (2005). The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire. Forest Ecology and Management, 211, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.010

Finney, M. A. (2006). An overview of FlamMap fire modeling capabilities. In: Andrews, Patricia L.; Butler, Bret W., comps. Fuels Management-How to Measure Success. Proceedings RMRS-P-41. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 213-220 .

Ghayour, L., Neshat, A., Paryani, S., Shahabi, H., Shirzadi, A., Chen, W., … & Ahmad, A. (2021). Performance Evaluation of Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 OLI Data for Land Cover/Use Classification Using a Comparison between Machine Learning Algorithms. Remote Sensing, 13, 1349. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071349

Glaves, D. J., Crowle, A. J. W., Bruemmer, C., & Lenaghan, S. A. (2020). The causes and prevention of wildfire on heathlands and peatlands in England. Natural England Evidence Review NEER014. Peterborough: Natural England.

Heydari, H., Arabi, M., & Warziniack, T. (2021a). Effects of Climate Change on Natural-Caused Fire Activity in Western U.S. National Forests. Atmosphere, 12, 981. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12080981

Heydari, M., Attar Roshan, S., Jaferyan, E., & Abiyat, M. (2021b). Modeling and Zoning of Fire Prone Areas in Zagros Forests Using Geographic Information System Based on Logistic Regression. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 10(2), 43-58. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2021.68903.1019

Hood, S. M., Varner, J. M., Jain, T. B., & Kane, J. M. (2022). A framework for quantifying forest wildfire hazard and fuel treatment effectiveness from stands to landscapes. Fire Ecology, 18, 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-022-00157-0

Jahdi, R., Salis, M., Alcasena, F. J., Arabi, M., Arca, B., & Duce, P. (2020). Evaluating landscape-scale wildfire exposure in northwestern Iran. Natural Hazards, 101, 911–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03901-4

Jahdi, R., Salis, M., Alcasena, F., & Del Giudice, L. (2023). Assessing the Effectiveness of Silvicultural Treatments on Fire Behavior in the Hyrcanian Temperate Forests of Northern Iran. Environmental Management, 72, 682–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01785-1

Janbozorgi, M., Hanifepour, M., & Khosravi, H. (2021). Temporal changes in meteorological-hydrological drought (Case study: Guilan Province). Water and Soil Management and Modeling, 1 (2), 1-13. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22098/mmws.2021.1215

Kolanek, A., Szymanowski, M., & Raczyk, A. (2021). Human Activity Affects Forest Fires: The Impact of Anthropogenic Factors on the Density of Forest Fires in Poland. Forests, 12, 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060728

Land use plan of Guilan Province. (2016). Management and Planning Organization (MPO) of Guilan Province. [In Persian]

Mauri, E., Hernández Paredes, E., Núñez Blanco, I., & García Feced, C. (2023). Key Recommendations on Wildfire Prevention in the Mediterranean. European Forest Institute,10. https://doi.org/10.36333/rs6

Meteorological Quarterly of the Guilan Province. (2019). General Meteorological Department of Guilan Province. [In Persian]

Mohammad Hasani Lor, S., Vafakhah, M., & Pourghasemi, H. R. (2016). Determining the land use area of ​​Gilan Province using supervised classification. Paper presented of the 2th National Conference on Passive Defense in Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environment with Sustainable Development Approach, Tehran.[In Persian] https://civilica.com/doc/567112

Narayanaraj, G., & Wimberly, M. C. (2012). Influences of forest roads on the spatial patterns of human- and lightning-caused wildfire ignitions Applied Geography. Applied Geography, 32(2), 878-888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.09.004

Nelson Jr, R. M. (2000). Prediction of diurnal change in 10-h fuel stick moisture content. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30(7), 1071-1087. https://doi.org/10.1139/x00-032

Okano, Y., & Yamano, H. (2015). Forest fire propagation simulations for a risk assessment methodology development for a nuclear power plant. Case Studies in Fire Safety, 4, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csfs.2015.05.001

Oliveira, S., Rocha, J., & Sá, A. (2021). Wildfire risk modeling. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 23, 100274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2021.100274

Parisien, M. C., Dawe, D. A., Miller, C., Stockdale, C. A., & Armitage, O. B. (2019). Applications of simulation-based burn probability modelling: A review. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28, 913-926. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF19069

Ratcliff, F., Rao, D., Barry, S., Dewees, S., Macaulay, L., Larsen, R., … & Forero, L. (2022). Cattle grazing reduces fuel and leads to more manageable fire behavior. California Agriculture, 76(2), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.2022a0011

Rothermel, R. C. (1972). A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels (Vol. 115). Intermountain Forest & Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture.

Sá, A. C. L., Aparicio, B. A., Benali, A., Bruni, C., Salis, M., Silva, F., … & Pereira, J. (2022). Coupling wildfire spread simulations and connectivity analysis for hazard assessment: a case study in Serra da Cabreira, Portugal. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 22, 3917–3938. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3917-2022

Salis, M., Arca, B., Del Giudice, L., Palaiologou, P., Alcasena-Urdiroz, F., Ager, A., … & Duce, P. (2021). Application of simulation modeling for wildfire exposure and transmission assessment in Sardinia, Italy. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 58,102189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102189

Scott, J. H., & Burgan, R. E. (2005). Standard Fire Behavior Fuel Models : A Comprehensive Set for Use with Rothermel’ S Surface Fire Spread Model. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.

Scott, J. H., Thompson, M. P., & Calkin, D. E. (2013). A wildfire risk assessment framework for land and resource management. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Paper RMRS-GTR-315.

Shi, C., & Zhang, F. (2023). A Forest Fire Susceptibility Modeling Approach Based on Integration Machine Learning Algorithm. Forests, 14, 1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071506

Statistical Yearbook of Guilan Province. (2019). Guilan Province Governor's Planning Office, Office of Statistics and Information GIS(2011-2018). .[In Persian]

Teimouri, M., & Kornejady, A. (2023). Evaluating Fire Hazard Potentials using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Logistic Regression Approaches in Golestan National Park. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 12(3), 171-191. [In Persian]  https://doi.org/10.22067/geoeh.2023.79999.1313

Twidwell, D., West, A. S., Hiatt, W. B., Ramirez, A., Winter, J. T., Engle, D. M., … & Carlson, J. D. (2016). Plant Invasions or Fire Policy: Which Has Altered Fire Behavior More in Tallgrass Prairie?. Ecosystems, 19, 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9937-y

Wollstein, K., Creutzburg, M. K., Dunn, C., Johnson, D. D., O'Connor, C., & Boyd, C. S. (2022). Toward Integrated Fire Management to Promote Ecosystem Resilience. Rangelands, 44(3), 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rala.2022.01.001

Xofis, P., Konstantinidis, P., Papadopoulos, I., & Tsiourlis, G. (2020). Integrating Remote Sensing Methods and Fire Simulation Models to Estimate Fire Hazard in a South-East Mediterranean Protected Area. Fire, 3, 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire3030031