• Register
  • Login
  • Persian

Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards

  1. Home
  2. An Analysis of Effective Factors on the Management of Ecological and Social Complexities in the Preservation of Rural Natural Resources (Case Study: Villages of Lorestan Province)

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Publication Ethics

Indexing and Abstracting

Editorial Board

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Instructions for Article Submission

Check list

Reviewer Guide

Reviewers List

An Analysis of Effective Factors on the Management of Ecological and Social Complexities in the Preservation of Rural Natural Resources (Case Study: Villages of Lorestan Province)

    Authors

    • Ali khodadadi 1
    • Morteza Tavakoli 2
    • Ali Akbar Anabestani 3

    1 PhD Candidate in Geography and Rural Planning, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    2 Associate Professor in Geography and Rural Planning, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    3 Professor, Department of Human Geography and Planning, Shahid Beheshti University

,

Document Type : Research Article

10.22067/geoeh.2022.72675.1112
  • Article Information
  • References
  • Download
  • How to cite
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract

Complexity science is about a management that deals with variety and multiplicity and tries to avoid dominant issues. Therefore, whenever there is a system composed of different factors on different scales with inherent and inseparable dependence and interdependence of factors, we face complexity. Ecological and social systems, on the other hand, are systems which are related to people and nature, emphasizing that man not only cannot be separated from nature, but also must be part of it. Hence, the necessity was felt to address the issue of managing ecological and social complexities in conserving natural resources. This exploratory research applied a descriptive-analytical method and used library and documentary sources. In order to analyze data, DEMATE was used. The results indicated that among the factors affecting the management of ecological and social complexity, such factors as lack of systemic and comprehensive attitude, lack of discussion of environmental resources for land management and its legal status, institutional barriers, lack of an integrated system of exploitation of natural resources and control of unstable factors, and lack of active participation and management interaction within the framework included in four propositions (f4) with a coefficient of 1.077 and active natural resources were identified  the most significant factors that affect the management of ecological and social complexities in preserving the natural resources of the villages of Lorestan province.

Keywords

  • Management
  • Ecological and Social Complexities
  • Natural Resources
  • Lorestan
  • XML
  • PDF 1.74 M
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
References
اطهری، زهرا؛ پزشکی­راد، غلامرضا؛ عباسی، عنایت و علی­بیگی، امیرحسین؛ 1395. تبیین الگوی مناسب مدیریت جامع حوزه­های آبخیز کشور. فصلنامه آمایش جغرافیایی فضا. 6(20): 209-225.       https://civilica.com/doc/886197/
الوانی، مهدی و دانایی­فرد، حسین؛ 1381. تئوری نظم در بی‌نظمی و مدیریت. چاپ اول. تهران: انتشارات صفار.
خطیبی، عطیه؛ دانه­کار، افشین؛ پورابراهیم، شراره و وحید، مجید؛ 1394. معرفی مدل DPSIR و قابلیت کاربرد آن در تصمیم­گیری­های محیط‌زیستی. فصلنامه انسان و محیط‌زیست. (53): 65-79.
https://he.srbiau.ac.ir/article_8959_bb9010bc043fcb0825a5baa9669a8cd3.pdf?lang=en
رحمانی­آزاد، الهام و قربانی، مهدی؛ 1395. یادگیری اجتماعی و تبادل دانش اکولوژیک بومی در مدیریت اکوسیستم­های طبیعی، مطالعه موردی: منطقه فیروزکوه_ روستای لزور. فصلنامه محیط‌زیست طبیعی. منابع طبیعی ایران. 96(1):  183-196.                                       https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=302320
سازمان برنامه‌وبودجه استان لرستان؛ 1395. اسناد بخشی برنامه ششم توسعه استان لرستان. خرم‌آباد: سازمان برنامه.
سازمان نقشه­برداری کشور؛ 1400. لایه رقومی محدوده موردمطالعه.                        https://www.ncc.gov.ir
طهوری، پریسا و پروین، محمدرضا؛ 1395. حفاظت و بهره­برداری پایدار از خاک و جایگاه آن در حقوق بین­الملل محیط‌زیست. فصلنامه علوم و تکنولوژی محیط‌زیست. 18(2):  145-161.
https://www.sid.ir/fa/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=274976
عنابستانی، علی­اکبر و نادری، مریم؛ 1397. بررسی چالش­های مدیریت منابع محیطی در مناطق روستایی، موردمطالعه: شهرستان بینالود. فصلنامه جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی. (28): 53-70.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22067/geo.v0i0.69713.
قربانی، مهدی؛ آذرنیوند، حسین؛ مهرابی، علی­اکبر؛ باستانی، سوسن؛ جعفری، محمد و نایبی، هوشنگ؛ 1391. تحلیل شبکه­ای اجتماعی: رویکرد نوین در سیاست­گذاری و برنامه­ریزی مدیریت مشارکتی منابع طبیعی. نشریه مرتع و آبخیزداری. مجله منابع طبیعی ایران. 65(4): 553-568. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=204531
قربانی، مهدی و ده­بزرگی، مه­رو؛ 1393. تحلیل ذینفعان، قدرت اجتماعی، و تحلیل شبکه در مدیریت مشارکتی منابع طبیعی. نشریه مرتع و آبخیزداری. مجله منابع طبیعی ایران. 67(1): 141-157. Doi: 10.22059/JRWM.2014.50835
قنبری، مهرداد؛ حیدری­نژاد، قدرت­اله و پرندین، کاوه؛ 1395. مدیریت عملکرد، چالش­های فراروی و تئوری پیچیدگی. فصلنامه حسابداری دولتی سوم. 2(1):  49-58.                     https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=357154
کبیری­هندی، مریم و دانه­کار، افشین؛ 1390. رویکرد یکپارچه در مدیریت و حفاظت میراث طبیعی و فرهنگی. مجله نامۀ باستان‌شناسی. 1(1):147-159.
https://nbsh.basu.ac.ir/article_322_0eee458b1a3402e596ed7047d8a0178f.pdf
کرمی، عزت‌الله و کشاورز، مرضیه؛ 1394. ابعاد انسانی حفاظت از منابع طبیعی، علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران 11(2):  101-120.                                                         Doi: 20.1001.1.20081758.1394.11.2.7.3.
لاریجانی، مریم؛ قربانی، مهدی و رحمانی­آزاد، الهام؛ 1392. تحلیل شبکه­ای ذینفعان محلی کنشگراى کلیدی (قدرت اجتماعی) در مدیریت مشارکتی سرزمین، موردمطالعه: بهره­برداران مرتع روستای لزور. فصلنامه پژوهش­های دانش سرزمین. 4(13): 37-50.                                                Doi: 20.1001.1.20088299.1392.4.1.3.3 
لواسانی، احمد؛ قنبری، احمد  و اصغری پور محمدرضا؛ 1394. ارزیابی پایداری اکولوژیکی سیستم­های تولید گلخانه­ای در منطقه سیستان. نشریه دانش کشاورزی و تولید پایدار. 25(3): 31-41.
https://www.sid.ir/fA/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=268790
مرکز آمار ایران؛ 1395. نتایج سرشمای عمومی نفوس و مسکن، بخش جمعیت، تهران: مرکز آمار ایران.
میرزایی، معصومه؛ کلاهی، مهدی و فرزام، محمد؛ 1397. مدیریت مشارکتی _ تطبیقی: رویکردی نوین در مدیریت پایدار مراتع. هفتمین همایش ملی مرتع و مرتعداری ایران. موسسه تحقیقات جنگل­ها و مراتع کشور. 18-19 اردیبهشت 1397.                                        https://profdoc.um.ac.ir/paper-abstract-1068758.html
نجاریان، پروانه؛ محمودنیا، علیرضا؛ ضرغامی، سعید و یمنی، محمد؛ 1392. بررسی نظریه پیچیدگی و تبیین اشارات آن در مدیریت سازمان­های آموزشی. فصلنامه روش­شناسی علوم انسانی. 19(76): 131-152.
http://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20140830121943-9897-109.pdf
نقوی، محمدرضا؛ دیوسالار، اسدالله و ریاحی، وحید؛ 1397. سنجش کیفیت زندگی درشهرهای ساحلی با استفاده از مدل DEMATEL در شهر ساحلی نور. فصلنامه جغرافیا و توسعه. (52):  211-226.            doi: 10.22111/gdij.2018.4005.  
وفایی، زهرا؛ فیّاضی، مرجان و شاه­حسینی، محمدعلی؛ 1399.  فهم کیفیت تعامل سازه­های رهبری پیچیدگی و سازمان اجتماعی از دیدگاهی مبتنی بر علوم پیچیده. فصلنامه پژوهش­های مدیریت عمومی. 13(47):  307-334.
doi.10.22111/JMR.2020.31955.4819
هادی­زاده­مقدم، اکرم؛ نکویی­زاده، مریم و میرزاده، لیلا؛ 1389. نقش تئوری پیچیدگی در تحول سازمان‌ها. فصلنامه تدبیر. (216): 30-35.                http://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20110215175420-M%20(13).pdf
 
Armitage, D., C. Béné, A. T. Charles, D. Johnson, and E. H. Allison., 2012. The interplay of well-being and resilience in applying a social-ecological perspective. Resilience Alliance Inc, Ecology and Society 17(4): 15. https:// www.ecologyandsociety.org/ vol17/iss4/art15/
Berkes, F., 2010. Shifting perspectives on resource management: Resilience and the Reconc-eptualization of ‘Natural Resources’ and ‘Management’ MAST 2010, 9(1): 13-40. https://www.marecentre.nl/mast/documents/Mastvol9no1_Berkes
Bodin O and Tengo, M., 2012. Disentangling intangible social–ecological systems, Global Environmental Change (22): 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.005.
Burgoyne, C., and Mearns K., 2017. Managing stakeholder relations, natural resources and tourism: A case study from Ololosokwan, Tanzania, Tourism and Hospitality Research, Vol. 17(1): 68–78. https://doi. org/10.1177/1467358416639088.
Chaffin, B.C and Gunderson, L.H., 2016. Emergence, institutionalization and renewal: Rhythms of adaptive governance in complex social-ecological systems, Journal of Environmental Management, (165): 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.003.
Cilliers, P., H. C. Biggs, S. Blignaut, A. G. Choles, J. S. Hofmeyr, G. P. W. Jewitt, and D. J. Roux., 2013. Complexity, modeling, and natural resource management. Resilience Alliance Inc, Ecology and Society 18(3): 1. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269371?seq=1
Clarke, S and Wildy, H., 2010. Preparing for pricipalship from the crucible of experience: reflecting on theory, practice and research, Journal of Educational Administration and History, 42(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620903462116.
Detcharat S and Pongpun, A., 2013. Using Dematel Method to Analyze the Causal Relations on Technological Innovation Capability Evaluation Factors in Thai Technology- Based Firms. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, Applied Sciences Technologies. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284487247
Donohue, I.,  Hillebrand, H., Montoya, J.M., Petchey,  O. L., Pimm,  S.L., Fowler,  M.S., Healy, K., Jackson, A. L., Lurgi, M., McClean, D., O’Connor,  N.E., O’Gorman, E. J and Yang,  Q., 2016. Navigating the complexity of ecological stability, Ecology Letters, doi: 10.1111/ele.12648. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12648.
Fabinyi, M., Evans, L and Foale, S.J., 2014. Social-ecological systems, social diversity, and power: insights from anthropology and political ecology, Ecology and Society 19(4): 28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269693
Fabinyi, M., Knudsen, M. and SEGI, S., 2010.  Social Complexity, Ethnography and Coastal Resource Management in the Philippines, Coastal Management, (38): 617–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2010.523412.
Fawcett, T.W., Fallenstein, B., Higginson,  A.D.,  Houston, A.I., Mallpress,  D.E.W., Trimmer,  P.C and McNamara J.M., 2014. The evolution of decision rules in complex environments, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(3): 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.012.
Garmestani, A.S and Benson, M.H., 2013. A framework for resilience-based governance of social-ecological systems, Ecology and Society 18(1):  9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05180-180109. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269259
George, G., SCHILLEBEECK, Simon J. D and liak, Teng lit T., 2015. The Management of Natural Resources: An Overview and Research Agenda, Academy of Management Journal. 58 (6): 1595-1613. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786435729.
Giménez, M. E and Fillat Estaque, F., 2012. Pyrenean Pastoralists’ Ecological Knowledge: Documentation and Application to Natural Resource Management and Adaptation, Hum Ecol, (40): 287–300. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10745-012-9463-x 
Herrero Jáuregui, C., Arnaiz-Schmitz, C., Fernanda Reyes, M., Telesnicki, M., Agramonte I., H. Easdale., M, Fe Schmitz, M., Aguiar, M.,  Gómez-Sal, A  and Montes, C., 2018. What do We Talk about When We Talk about Social-Ecological Systems? A Literature Review, Sustainability, 10, 2950. DOI:10.3390/su10082950.
Idrissou, L., van Paassen, A., Aarts, N., Vodouhè e, S and Leeuwis, C., 2013. Trust and hidden conflict in participatory natural resources management: The case of the Pendjari national park (PNP) in Benin, Forest Policy and Economics (27): 65–74. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.forpol.2012.11.005.
Jackson, L.E.,  Pulleman, M.M.,  Brussaard, L., Bawa, K.S., Brown, G.G., Cardoso, I.M., de Ruiter, P.C., Garcia Barrios, L., Hollander, A.D., Lavelle, P. Oue draogo, E. Pascual, U., Setty, S., Smukler, S.M. Tscharntke, T and Van Noordwijk, M., 2012.  Social-ecological and regional adaptation of agrobiodiversity management across a global set of research regions,  Global Environmental Change (22): 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.05.002.
Kaushik,  S,. and Somvir, Dr., 2015. DEMATEL: A Methodology for Research in Library and Information Science, International Journal of Librarianship and Administration, 6(2): 179-185. http://www.ripublication.com/
Laurila-Pant, M., Lehikoinen, A., Uusitalo, L and Venesjärvi,  R., 2015. How to value biodiversity in environmental management? Ecological Indicators (55): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecolind.2015.02.034.
Lee, E., and M. Krasny. E., 2015. The role of social learning for social-ecological systems in Korean village groves restoration. Resilience Alliance Inc, Ecology and Society 20(1): 42. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5751/ES-07289-200142.
Leenhardt, P,. Teneva, L,.  Kininmonth, S,.  Darling, E,. Cooley, S and Claudet, J., 2015.  Challenges, insights and perspectives associated with using social-ecological science for , journal Ocean & Coastal Management (115): 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.04.018.
Levin, S., Xepapadeas, T., CR´Epin, A-S., Norberg, J., Zeeuw, A.DE., Folke, C., Hughes, T., Arrow, K., Barreet, S., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., Kautsky, N., RAN MA LER, K-GO., POLASKY, S., TROELL, M., VINCENT J.R. and WALKER B., 2013. Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: modeling and policy implications, Environment and Development Economics, 111–132 .https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X12000460.
Moore, M.L., Tjornbo, O., Enfors, E., Knapp, C., Hodbod, J.,  Baggio, J.A. Norström, Olsson, A.P and Biggs, D., 2014. Studying the complexity of change: toward an analytical framework for understanding deliberate social-ecological transformations, Ecology and Society 19(4): 54. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06966-190454.
Nykvist, B., and von Heland, J., 2014. Social-ecological memory as a source of general and specified resilience. Resilience Alliance Inc, Ecology and Society 19(2): 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06167-190247.
Ojha, H., Ford R., Keena, N. J., Race, D., Carias Vega, D., Himlal B and Sapkota, P., 2016. Delocalizing Communities: Changing Forms of Community Engagement in Natural Resources Governance, World Development, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev. 2016. 06.017. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305750X16304053
Perez-Soba, M and Dwyer, J., 2016. The social-ecological system concept, Wageningen university, DG AGRI Workshop. 
Piontek, F., 2020. Integrated Environmental Quality Management as a Function of the Adopted Concept of Development, Middle Pomeranian Scientific Society of the Environment Protection, Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska, Vol22, ISSN 1506-218X, 669-679. https://www.ros.edu.pl/
Pretty,  J., 2011. Interdisciplinary progress in approaches to address social-ecological and ecocultural systems, Environmental Conservation, 38 (2): 127–139. https:// doi.org/ 10.1017/S0376892910000937.
Reyers, B., Biggs, R., Cumming, G.S., Elmqvist, T., Hejnowicz, A.P and Polasky, S., 2013. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social–ecological approach, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(5): 268-273, ISSN 1540-9295.  https://doi.org/10.1890/120144.
Reyers, B., Nel, J. L., O’Farrell,  P.J.,  Sitas, N and Nel, D.C., 2015.  Navigating complexity through knowledge coproduction: Mainstreaming ecosystem services into disaster risk reduction, Special Feature: Perspective, 112(24): 7362–7368. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414374112.
Ruokonen, E and Temmes, A., 2019. The approaches of strategic environmental management used by mining companies in Finland, Journal of Cleaner Production (210): 466-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.273.
Schluter, M., Mcallister, R.,  Arlingaaus, R., Bunnefeld, N., Eisenack, K., HOlker, F.,  Milner-Gulland, E.J.,  Muller, B.,  Nicholson, E., Quaas, M and Stoven, M., 2012. NEW HORIZONS FOR MANAGING THE ENVIRONMENT: A REVIEW OF COUPLED SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS MODELING, NATURAL RESOURCE MODELING, 25(1): 219-272. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1939-7445.2011.00108.x
Seymour,  E., Curtis, A., Pannell, D.,  Allan, C. and Roberts, A., 2010. Understanding the role of assigned values in natural resource management, Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 17(3): 142-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2010.9725261.
Stern, M. J., and T. Baird., 2015. Trust ecology and the resilience of natural resource management institutions. Resilience Alliance Inc, Ecology and Society 20(2): 14. http:// dx.doi.org/ 10.5751/ES-07248-200214. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26270214
Thomas,C. and Koontz, T. M., 2011. Research Designs for Evaluating the Impact of Community-Based Management on Natural Resource Conservation, Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 3(2):  97–111. DOI: 10.1080/19390459.2011.557877.
uni-kiel, de.,  Burkhard, B.,  Petrosillo, I and Costanza, R., 2010. Ecosystem services – Bridging ecology, economy and social sciences, Ecological Complexity, (7): 257–259. http://www.uni-kiel.de/ecology/users/fmueller/salzau2008/ESS_EcoCom_2008_09.pdf
Virapongse, A., Brooks, S., Covelli Metcalf, E., Zedalis, M., Gosz, J., Kliskey, A and Alessa, L., 2019. A social-ecological systems approach for environmental management, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.jenvman.2016.02.028.
Westley, F.R., O.Tjornbo, L., Schultz, P., Olsson, C., Folke, B.C and Bodin, Ö., 2013. A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems, Ecology and Society 18(3): 27. http://dx.doi. org/10.5751/ES-05072-180327. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269375
    • Article View: 3,100
    • PDF Download: 1,132
Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards
Volume 11, Issue 1 - Serial Number 41
March 2022
Pages 279-303
Files
  • XML
  • PDF 1.74 M
History
  • Receive Date: 07 October 2021
  • Revise Date: 04 February 2022
  • Accept Date: 09 February 2022
Share
How to cite
  • RIS
  • EndNote
  • Mendeley
  • BibTeX
  • APA
  • MLA
  • HARVARD
  • CHICAGO
  • VANCOUVER
Statistics
  • Article View: 3,100
  • PDF Download: 1,132

APA

khodadadi, A. , Tavakoli, M. and Anabestani, A. A. (2022). An Analysis of Effective Factors on the Management of Ecological and Social Complexities in the Preservation of Rural Natural Resources (Case Study: Villages of Lorestan Province). Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 11(1), 279-303. doi: 10.22067/geoeh.2022.72675.1112

MLA

khodadadi, A. , , Tavakoli, M. , and Anabestani, A. A. . "An Analysis of Effective Factors on the Management of Ecological and Social Complexities in the Preservation of Rural Natural Resources (Case Study: Villages of Lorestan Province)", Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 11, 1, 2022, 279-303. doi: 10.22067/geoeh.2022.72675.1112

HARVARD

khodadadi, A., Tavakoli, M., Anabestani, A. A. (2022). 'An Analysis of Effective Factors on the Management of Ecological and Social Complexities in the Preservation of Rural Natural Resources (Case Study: Villages of Lorestan Province)', Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 11(1), pp. 279-303. doi: 10.22067/geoeh.2022.72675.1112

CHICAGO

A. khodadadi , M. Tavakoli and A. A. Anabestani, "An Analysis of Effective Factors on the Management of Ecological and Social Complexities in the Preservation of Rural Natural Resources (Case Study: Villages of Lorestan Province)," Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 11 1 (2022): 279-303, doi: 10.22067/geoeh.2022.72675.1112

VANCOUVER

khodadadi, A., Tavakoli, M., Anabestani, A. A. An Analysis of Effective Factors on the Management of Ecological and Social Complexities in the Preservation of Rural Natural Resources (Case Study: Villages of Lorestan Province). Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, 2022; 11(1): 279-303. doi: 10.22067/geoeh.2022.72675.1112

  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap

News

  • New Issue publication 2024-12-21
  • Scientific Collaboration with Iranian Quaternary Association 2022-04-20
  • Scientific cooperation with Iranian Association Of ... 2020-12-17

Creative Commons Licence

Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards  are fully compliant with open access mandates, by publishing its articles under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

Newsletter Subscription

Subscribe to the journal newsletter and receive the latest news and updates

© Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb