Spatial Analysis of Soil Erosion and Habitat Quality Based on Land Use Patterns in Sistan Region, Eastern Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Mohammad Amin Izadi poor ¹
• Reza Dahmardeh Behrooz ^{2 ¶}
• Fatemeh Eynollahi Pir ³
• Fatemeh Rajaei ⁴

¹ MSc of Environmental Sciences, Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran

² Associate Professor, Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.

³ Assistant Professor, Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran

⁴ Assistant Professor, Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

10.22067/geoeh.2024.87025.1468

Abstract

Soil erosion is a significant environmental issue in terrestrial ecosystems that can impact habitat quality in a region. This study aimed to evaluate soil erosion and habitat quality in the Sistan region, eastern Iran, based on land use patterns. The InVEST model was used to assess soil erosion and habitat quality after collecting the necessary data. The relationship between soil erosion and habitat quality was analyzed using Spearman's correlation test and geographically weighted regression (GWR). The study found that the annual soil erosion in the region was 3.41 Mt (averaging 2.07 t ha⁻¹). Despite having higher quality, the western habitats showed a higher potential for soil erosion. The highest and lowest erosion rates were observed in rangelands (3.6 t ha⁻¹ y⁻¹) and wetlands (0 t ha⁻¹ y⁻¹), respectively. The highest and lowest habitat quality values were seen in rangelands and built-up areas, respectively. Spearman's test revealed a positive and significant correlation between habitat quality and soil erosion (R = 0.71, P-value < 0.01). GWR analysis also confirmed a significant spatial correlation between the two variables (R² = 0.91, P-value < 0.01). The spatial pattern of habitat quality and soil erosion in the study area was similar, with higher-quality habitats located in the western parts of the region, which naturally had a higher potential for erosion. This study provided valuable information on habitat quality and soil erosion and emphasized the importance of managers and planners adopting effective strategies to reduce soil erosion, particularly in high-quality habitats in the region.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
 Climate change, driven by global warming, poses an existential threat to both natural and human systems, necessitating accurate and reliable projections of future climate variations. While extensive research has examined the impacts of climate change on various subsystems and proposed adaptation and mitigation strategies, many studies have overlooked the inherent uncertainties in climate modeling. Limiting analyses to selected scenarios from Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Models (AOGCMs) and neglecting uncertainty analysis reduces the credibility and certainty of the final results. Indeed, uncertainties arising from structural and parametric diversity in models, downscaling processes, and impact assessment models require rigorous investigation and quantification.
A comprehensive assessment of climate change impacts requires the identification and analysis of three primary categories of uncertainty:

Uncertainties associated with the structure and parameters of AOGCMs;
Uncertainties arising from statistical and dynamical downscaling methods at regional scales; and
Parametric and structural uncertainties in impact assessment models.

AOGCMs, due to their diversity in structure and parameters, produce varying outputs for climatic variables, representing a significant source of uncertainty in climate projections. Incorporating uncertainties into climate change impact assessments leads to various plausible future scenarios that can inform decision-making and adaptation planning. Given computational and data limitations, a comprehensive examination of all uncertainty sources in every study is infeasible. However, studies have shown that certain uncertainties, such as those related to downscaling methods, significantly impact the final results and must be considered in assessing climate change impacts on river flows. Employing multi-model ensemble approaches and ensemble prediction methods to quantify and reduce uncertainties arising from AOGCMs is an effective strategy adopted in this research.
Material and Method
The Qarasu watershed, located in western Iran within Kermanshah province, served as the focal point of this study. Observational data spanning 1976–2005 were obtained from the Kermanshah synoptic station, courtesy of the Iran Meteorological Organization. Complementing this, downscaled data from 21 Global Circulation Models (GCMs) were acquired from the NASA Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Projections (NEX-GDDP) dataset. This dataset encompassed both the historical (1976–2005) and future (2020–2049) periods under the Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5 (RCP4.5) scenario, selected for its intermediate climate change trajectory.
Following meticulous data validation and preprocessing, the uncertainty inherent in the GCMs was rigorously assessed. To evaluate GCM performance, the coefficient of determination (R²) and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) were computed, facilitating a comparative analysis between simulated temperature and precipitation under RCP4.5 and observed values from the Kermanshah synoptic station.
To address and mitigate uncertainties in climate projections, this research employed a suite of ensemble methods, including ensemble prediction (EP), multi-model ensembles (MEP), and weighted multi-model ensembles (MEPWi), rather than relying solely on individual model outputs. The fundamental premise underpinning these methods is that models demonstrating superior skill in replicating historical climate patterns are anticipated to maintain their relative accuracy in future projections, thereby identifying them as optimal candidates. Consequently, the weight assigned to each model within the ensemble is directly proportional to its historical performance. Finally, the accuracy of the model simulations relative to observational data was evaluated using R² and NSE.
Results and Discussion
The findings indicated that MRI-CGCM3, MPI-ESM-LR, BNU-ESM, ACCESS1-0, MIROC-ESM, MIROC-ESM-CHEM, and MPI-ESM-MR exhibited robust performance in simulating monthly precipitation patterns. Concurrently, ACCESS1-0, CNRM-CM5, MIROC-ESM, MIROC-ESM-CHEM, MPI-ESM-LR, MPI-ESM-MR, MRI-CGCM3, and BNU-ESM demonstrated heightened accuracy in replicating temperature regimes. Notably, MRI-CGCM3, MPI-ESM-MR, and MIROC-ESM-CHEM were assigned the highest weights and exhibited the lowest uncertainty in their simulations of monthly precipitation, maximum temperature, and minimum temperature, signifying their superior fidelity and minimal deviation.
Analysis of statistical metrics from the ensemble methods revealed that the multi-model ensemble prediction (MEP) approach, characterized by an R² of 0.95 and NSE of 0.92, provided the most congruent estimates compared to baseline data from the Kermanshah synoptic station. Consequently, the MEP method was adjudicated as the optimal ensemble prediction paradigm for GCMs in this study.
Scrutiny of mean monthly and annual fluctuations under the MEP framework projected that:

Monthly and annual precipitation are anticipated to change by 1.9% and 22.7%, respectively, in the future period.
Mean monthly and annual temperature increments are projected to be 1.89°C and 1.88°C, respectively.

Conclusions
This study examined and compared various climate modeling methodologies to mitigate uncertainty in climate projections. Our findings reveal that no single climate model accurately predicts all climatic parameters within a given region. Optimal projections for temperature and precipitation necessitate the utilization of multiple models, underscoring the importance of multi-model ensemble techniques. We evaluated three ensemble methods: Model Ensemble with Weighting (MEPWi), Model Ensemble Projection (MEP), and Ensemble Prediction (EP).
The results indicated that projected values from these methods were relatively consistent, with minimal discernible differences. However, the MEP method yielded the most precise estimates for temperature and precipitation, establishing it as the superior technique for reducing uncertainty in climate projections. This research emphasizes that leveraging diverse climate models significantly enhances projection accuracy and reduces uncertainties. Relying solely on a single GCM is insufficient for formulating robust strategies to mitigate climate change impacts. Our results align with prior research demonstrating the efficacy of multi-model ensembles in improving predictive accuracy.
In summary, this study demonstrates that applying climate model ensemble techniques, particularly the MEP method, substantially improves the reliability of climate projections. This enhanced precision is crucial for enabling policymakers and planners to make informed decisions aimed at mitigating climate change impacts. Future studies could explore the performance of these ensemble methods under different climate scenarios and in other regions.

Keywords

• Soil Erosion
• Habitat Quality
• Land Use
• InVEST
• GWR

Main Subjects

• Soil erosion

---

References

Ahmadi Mirghaed, F. A., & Souri, B. (2022). Effect of landscape fragmentation on soil quality and ecosystem services in land use and landform types. Environmental Earth Sciences, 81(12), 330.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-732507/v1

Ahmadi Mirghaed, F., Rahmani, M., & Molla Aghajanzadeh, S. (2025). Quantification of water yield concerning land use and climate scenarios in the Tajan watershed, North of Iran. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(2), 849-862. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05749-8

Ahmadi Mirghaed, F., Souri, B., Mohammadzadeh, M., Salmanmahiny, A., & Mirkarimi, S. H. (2018). Evaluation of the relationship between soil erosion and landscape metrics across Gorgan Watershed in northern Iran. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190, 1-14.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7040-5

Alewell, C., Borrelli, P., Meusburger, K., & Panagos, P. (2019). Using the USLE: Chances, challenges and limitations of soil erosion modelling. International soil and Water Conservation Research, 7(3), 203-225.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.05.004

Aneseyee, A. B., Elias, E., Soromessa, T., & Feyisa, G. L. (2020a). Land use/land cover change effect on soil erosion and sediment delivery in the Winike watershed, Omo Gibe Basin, Ethiopia. Science of the Total Environment, 728, 138776.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138776

Aneseyee, A. B., Noszczyk, T., Soromessa, T., & Elias, E. (2020b). The InVEST habitat quality model associated with land use/cover changes: A qualitative case study of the Winike Watershed in the Omo-Gibe Basin, Southwest Ethiopia. Remote Sensing, 12(7), 1103.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs12071103

Department of Environment Islamic Republic of Iran. [In Persian] https://rko.doe.ir/

Derakhshan Babaei, F., Nosrati, K., Mirghaed, F. A., & Egli, M. (2021). The interrelation between landform, land-use, erosion and soil quality in the Kan catchment of the Tehran province, central Iran. Catena, 204, 105412.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105412

Dou, X., Ma, X., Zhao, C., Li, J., Yan, Y., & Zhu, J. (2022). Risk assessment of soil erosion in Central Asia under global warming. Catena, 212, 106056.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106056

Gomiero, T. (2016). Soil degradation, land scarcity and food security: Reviewing a complex challenge. Sustainability, 8(3), 281.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su8030281

Gong, J., Xie, Y., Cao, E., Huang, Q., & Li, H. (2019). Integration of InVEST-habitat quality model with landscape pattern indexes to assess mountain plant biodiversity change: A case study of Bailongjiang watershed in Gansu Province. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29, 1193-1210.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1653-7

He, J., Huang, J., & Li, C. (2017). The evaluation for the impact of land use change on habitat quality: A joint contribution of cellular automata scenario simulation and habitat quality assessment model. Ecological Modelling, 366, 58-67.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.10.001

Lei, J., Chen, Y., Li, L., Chen, Z., Chen, X., Wu, T., & Li, Y. (2022). Spatiotemporal change of habitat quality in Hainan Island of China based on changes in land use. Ecological Indicators, 145, 109707.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109707

Li, H., & Shi, D. (2024). Spatio-temporal variation in soil erosion on sloping farmland based on the integrated valuation of ecosystem services and trade-offs model: A case study of Chongqing, southwest China. Catena, 236, 107693.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107693

Li, N., Zhang, Y., Wang, T., Li, J., Yang, J., & Luo, M. (2022). Have anthropogenic factors mitigated or intensified soil erosion over the past three decades in South China?. Journal of Environmental Management, 302, 114093.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114093

Mahmoodi, M. A., & Naghshbandi, S. P. (2020). Estimation of Soil Erosion by RUSLE and Remote Sensing Data of Gawshan Dam Basin. Water and Soil, 33(6), 845-856. [In Persian]  https://doi.org/10.22067/jsw.v33i6.76446

Mirghaed, F. A., & Souri, B. (2023). Contribution of land use, soil properties and topographic features for providing of ecosystem services. Ecological Engineering, 189, 106898.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2023.106898

Moreira, M., Fonseca, C., Vergílio, M., Calado, H., & Gil, A. (2018). Spatial assessment of habitat conservation status in a Macaronesian island based on the InVEST model: A case study of Pico Island (Azores, Portugal). Land Use Policy, 78, 637–649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.015

Nematollahi, S., Fakheran, S., Kienast, F., Pourmanafi, S., & Jafari, A. (2021). Assessing the Impact of Road Networks on Decreasing the Quality of Wildlife’ Habitats Using the Vicinity Impact Index (Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari Province). Desert Management, 8(16), 37-56. [In Persian]  https://doi.org/10.22034/jdmal.2021.243139

Nezhadafzali, K., Shahrokhi, M. R., & Bayatani, F. (2019). Assessment soil erosion using RUSLE model and identification the most effective factor in Dekhan watershed basin of southern Kerman. Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards, 8(20), 21-38. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22111/jneh.2018.21894.1316

Obiahu, O. H., & Elias, E. (2020). Effect of land use land cover changes on the rate of soil erosion in the Upper Eyiohia river catchment of Afikpo North Area, Nigeria. Environmental Challenges, 1, 100002.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2020.100002

Pu, J., Shen, A., Liu, C., & Wen, B. (2024). Impacts of ecological land fragmentation on habitat quality in the Taihu Lake basin in Jiangsu Province, China. Ecological Indicators, 158, 111611.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111611

Qiao, X., Li, Z., Lin, J., Wang, H., Zheng, S., & Yang, S. (2023). Assessing current and future soil erosion under changing land use based on InVEST and FLUS models in the Yihe River Basin, North China. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 12(2), 298-312.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.07.001

Renard, K. G., & Freimund, J. R. (1994). Using monthly precipitation data to estimate the R-factor in the revised USLE. Journal of Hydrology, 157(1-4), 287-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)90110-4

Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D. W. (1974). Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In Proceeding Of Erts‐1 Symposium, NASA. Goddard Space Flight Center 3d ERTS-1. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19740022614

Sadeghi, S. H., Zabihi, M., Vafakhah, M., & Hazbavi, Z. (2017). Spatiotemporal mapping of rainfall erosivity index for different return periods in Iran. Natural Hazards, 87, 35-56.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2752-3

Sharp, R., Tallis, H. T., Ricketts, T., Guerry, A. D., Wood, S. A., Chaplin-Kramer, R., & Olwero, N. (2015). InVEST Version 3.2. 0 User's Guide. The Natural Capital Project. The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund.‏ https://naturalcapitalproject.stanford.edu/software/invest/invest-downloads-data

Smith, D. D., & Wischmeier, W. H. (1962). Rainfall erosion. Advances in Agronomy, 14, 109-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60437-x

Sun, W., Shao, Q., Liu, J., & Zhai, J. (2014). Assessing the effects of land use and topography on soil erosion on the Loess Plateau in China. Catena, 121, 151-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.009

Toubal, A. K., Achite, M., Ouillon, S., & Dehni, A. (2018). Soil erodibility mapping using the RUSLE model to prioritize erosion control in the Wadi Sahouat basin, north-west of Algeria. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190(4), 210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6580-z

Van der Knijff, J. M., Jones, R. J. A., & Montanarella, L. (2000). Soil erosion risk assessment in Europe. Luxembourg: Official Publications of the European Communities.

Wei, Q., Abudureheman, M., Halike, A., Yao, K., Yao, L., Tang, H., & Tuheti, B. (2022). Temporal and spatial variation analysis of habitat quality on the PLUS-InVEST model for Ebinur Lake Basin, China. Ecological Indicators, 145, 109632.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109632

Wu, L., Sun, C., & Fan, F. (2021). Estimating the Characteristic Spatiotemporal Variation in Habitat Quality Using the InVEST Model—A Case Study from Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area. Remote Sensing, 13(5), 1008. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs13051008

Zare, M., Panagopoulos, T., & Loures, L. )2017(. Simulating the impacts of future land use change on soil erosion in the Kasilian watershed, Iran. Land Use Policy, 67, 558–572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.028