Analysis of the Effects of Earthquake in Rural Areas (Case study: Varzeghan)

Document Type : Research Article

Author

• Vakil Heidari Sarban

Mohagheghe Ardabili University

10.22067/geo.v3i3.31388

Abstract

1. Introduction
The evidence of geology show that in all of times earth have been threatened by nature forces that may be earthquake is the strongest phenomenon among them. Earthquake is one of the phenomenons of planet that have killed the thousands of people and have damaged to assets of people. Earthquake by reason of expansion of territory and also expanse and intense of its damage is the most popular natural disasters of world. Earthquake is one of the disastrous natural phenomena, and has direct, indirect, functional, secondary, long- time and short-time effects on human and rural- urban settlements. On August 21st, two earthquakes struck East Azerbaijan Province at 16:53 and 17:04respectively with a magnitude 6.2 and 6. Varzaghan, Ahar and Harsin cities has been the focus of most damages. By the time this report was written, official reports of loss of life have declared 327 deaths and more than 3,000 injured. Based on seismograms’ records in the national broadband seismic network of IIEES, the epicenter of these events, were: 38/55 degrees north latitude and 46/87 degrees east for the first one and second earthquake coordinates 38/58 degrees north latitude and 46/78 degrees east. Depth of both earthquakes has been reported to be about 10 km. The area is subject to earthquakes, and in 2012 a number of people were killed when two earthquakes, magnitude 6.4 and a 6.3 struck on the afternoon of 11 August.
Earthquake has some economic, political, social, psychological, cultural and skeletal consequences. This research is tried to investigate these consequences in the period of renovation in rural areas of Varzeghan. The research is intended to find an answer to this question: “what are effects of earthquake in rural areas”. In this relation, the theoretical framework of the Earthquake is investigated, and by presenting a theoretical model, the effects of earthquake in rural areas is investigated.
2. Study Area
Varzeghan County is a county in East Azerbaijan Province in Iran. The capital of the county is Varzeghan. At the 2006 census, its population was 3,549, in 930 families. The city is famous for the Sungun copper mine, 25 km from the city centre, which is estimated to have 3 percent of the known copper reserves in the world. Farming is the predominant occupation in the rural areas. The area produces apple, pear, cherry, walnut and apricot fruit. Recently spruce trees have been planted as the start of a forestry industry. Cold water fish farming has been started. Varzeghan is a mining centre for base metal mining, as well as gold. The Sungun copper mine is now the largest copper mine in northwestern Iran. The deposit itself is one of the largest copper deposits in the world. There are nearby gold mines at Shrfabad, Hyzjan, Tshkhsrv, Astrgan, Andryan and Myvhrvd.
3. Method and Materials
The main object of the research is investigation of the effects of earthquake in rural areas in Varzeghan. The research method adopted here is descriptive- analytic, and data gathering procedure is based on library and field findings. The research sample is all of the rural settlers affected by earthquake in rural areas of Varzeghan. The total number of rural-settlers affected by earthquake was estimated 398, and the number of sample was calculated 131 individuals based on Cochran's sample size formula. Reliability of the questionnaire was approved by scholars, and validity of the questionnaire was calculated 74-84% using Cronbach’s (alpha).
4. Result and Discussion
Mean scores of rural- settlers opinions was calculated and prioritized to determine the effects of earthquake on rural areas from point of view of rural- settlers. Coefficient of variations was used to prioritize which is a relative index and make comparison of different variables possible. As the research showed stress and exacerbation of depression and dejection, disruption to the family relationships, physical pain, disability to perform daily activities and social disintegration were among the most important prioritized factors.
5. Conclusion
The research findings showed that the effects of earthquake in rural areas are as follows: change in the pattern of food consumption, changes in jobs, loss of productivity, instability in the economic relations, change in trade and economic functions, lack of access to health services, disruption to social communication and reduce in communicational infrastructures, disruption to investments, loss of property, loss of life expectancy, loss of job satisfaction, lack of access to adequate food, disruption to family relationships, physical pain, social disintegration, severe damage to the social networks, reduce in integration and interaction between people, homelessness and the sense of personal and social disability, death of families, reduce in social tendencies, increase in stress, depression and dejection, increase in conflicts, fall of sphere of private life into the risk, decline in the demand, loss of self satisfaction, reduce in the feeling of being useful, social and economic insecurity, disability to perform daily activities, lack of access to health care and health services, water and soil pollution, disturbance in waste materials management, lack of access to the information, destruction of infrastructures and the destruction of housing, lands and work equipments.

Keywords

• Earthquake
• Vulnerability
• Factor analysis
• Rural Development
• Varzeghan

---

References

ابراهیم پور، محسن؛1387. پیامدهای اجتماعی زلزله بم در روستاهای آسیب‌دیده، فصلنامه روستا و توسعه. سال 11. شماره4. 180-176. تهران.

احد نژاد روشتی، محسن و همکاران؛1390. مکان‌یابی بهینه مکان‌های اسکان موقت آسیب دیدگان ناشی از زلزله در مناطق شهری با استفاده از روش‌های چند معیاری GIS. مطالعه موردی: شهرستان زنجان. نشریه تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی. جلد20. شماره23. ص 46. تهران.

پور احمد، احمد و همکاران؛1388. بررسی ابعاد پیشگیری از بحران زلزله. مطالعه موردی: شهر بابل. فصلنامه مطالعات و پژوهش‌های شهری و منطقه‌ای. سال اول. شماره اول. ص 2. اصفهان.

پور طاهری، مهدی و همکاران؛1389. نقش ظرفیت‌سازی در کاهش تأثیرات مخاطرات طبیعی (زلزله) در مناطق روستایی با تأکید بر روش‌های کمی. مطالعه موردی: مناطق زلزله‌زده شهرستان خدابنده. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی. شماره73. 39-23. تهران.

پور طاهری، مهدی و همکاران؛1390. سنجش و ارزیابی مؤلفه‌های مبنایی مدیریت ریسک زلزله. مطالعه موردی: مناطق روستایی شهرستان قزوین. شماره یک. صص 150-115. تهران.

حجازی، سید اسدالله و همکاران؛1391. مدیریت بحران و احیای سکونتگاه‌های روستایی شهرستان ورزقان با استفاده از تکنیک‌های نوین. اولین کنفرانس ملی بهسازی و مقاوم‌سازی بافت‌های شهری در مجاورت گسل‌های فعال 2و 3 اسفند 1391. تبریز. ایران.

خالدی، شهریار؛1382. بلایای طبیعی. انتشارات دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.

رشیدی، معصومه و همکاران؛1390. مدیریت بحران در جهت تعدیل خسارت‌های حاصل از زلزله در استان تهران. فصلنامه امداد و نجات. سال سوم. شماره1 و 2. ص190. تهران.

شکیبا، علیرضا؛1387. بحران. دانشنامه مدیریت شهری و روستایی. انتشارات سازمان شهرداری‌ها و دهیاری‌های کشور. تهران. صص102-100. تهران.

عنابستانی علی‌اکبر؛1387. گسل درونه و استقرار سکونتگاه‌های انسانی در منطقه کاشمر. مجله پژوهش‌های جغرافیایی. سال چهلم. شماره63. تهران.

قدیری، محمود علی؛1381. کاربرد روش‌های برنامه‌ریزی شهری (کاربری زمین) در کاهش آسیب‌پذیری مناطق شهری در برابر زلزله. مطالعه موردی: منطقه 17 تهران. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد به راهنمایی دکتر علی عسگری. دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.

گیدنز، آنتونی؛1380. پیامدهای مدرنیته. ترجمه محسن ثلاثی. تهران. نشر مرکز.

گیوه چی، سعید؛1388. تحلیل و ارائه الگوهای مدیریت در سوانح شهری ناشی از مخاطرات زیست محیطی. مورد منطقه 6 تهران. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری. دانشگاه تهران.

مصیب زاده، علی؛1386. عوامل مؤثر بر بحران زلزله و راهکارهای مقابله با آن. نمونه موردی: چایپاره. مجله مسکن و انقلاب. شماره117. تهران.

مظاهری، محمدمهدی و امیر محمود زاده؛1388. نقش GITدر ترسیم و بسط الگوریتم جهت ارزیابی سریع ساختمان‌ها در مدیریت بحران ناشی از زلزله. فصلنامه بصیرت. سال شانزدهم. شماره43. 32. تهران.

Anderson, M, Woodrow, P.,1999. Rising from ashes: Development Strategies in Times of Disasters. Paris, West View Press, UNSCO.

Bolt,A.B., 1994. Seismological information necessary for beneficial earthquake risk reduction, Issues in Urban in Earthquake Risk, pp.21-25.

Britton, N., 2005. Developing understanding of disaster, Journal of sociology, Vol(22), No.2.p.54.

Buckle,P., 2001. Community based management: A new approach to managing disasters, Proceedings of ESA Conference, Visions and Divisions, Helsinki, August 28-September,p.25.

Cosgrave,J.,2007. Synthesis Report: expanded summary: joint evaluation of the international response to the Indian ocean Tsunami . Retrieved from: www.tusunami –evalution.org.

Cuny, F.C. 1983. Disasters and development, Oxford University Press.

Davis,I.,2006. Learning from disaster recovery guidance for decision makers, International Recovery platform.

Kotte, k., 2004. Links between land administration and risk management, Fig Seminar om E-land administration Innsbruck, Austria, Vol(4), No.5,pp.1-6.

Lavell,A., 2005. Capacity building and human resources development for disaster management, Journal of International Affairs, Vol(5),N.5.pp.63-66.

Marathe,P.,2006. Concepts and practices in disinters management, India, pune, Diamond Publication.

Meuwissen, M.P.M.,Huirne,R.B.M and Hardaker,J,B.,2001. Risk and risk management: an empirical analysis of Dutch livestocks farmers/Livestock Production Science 2(69), pp.43-53.

Mitchell, J.K. Devine,N.Jagger,K.,1999.A Contextual model of natural hazards. Geographic Review, Vol(32), No.10.pp.391-394.

Narita, E., 2008. Disaster management as a social activity: the achive beyond what is possible, Annual review of Sociology, Vol(33),No.1.pp.504-505.

Oliver-smith, Anthony, H., 1999. The energy earth: disaster in anthropological perspectives, New York, Rout ledge.

Rashed, K, Weeks,J., 2003. Assessing vulnerability to earthquake hazardous through spatial multicentre analysis of urban areas, International Journal of Geographic Information Science, Vol(17),No.16, p.57.

Skees,J.R.,2003. Risk management challenge in rural financial market: Blending risk management innovation with rural finance. An Introduction Conference on Best Practices Washington DC, June, pp. 2-4.

Wenger,D,Par,Arnold., 1996. Community functions under disaster conditions, Ohio: Ohio State University, Disaster Research Center, Columbus,Ohio.

Winser, B, Lan,d., 2003. at risk natural hazardous, peoples vulnerability and disasters, Second Edition, London and New York, Rout ledge.

Zavaigzne, A., 2005. Risk management in rural tourism enterprises in Lativa, Resume of the Ph.D Paper the Scientific Degree of Dr. OCC,Lativa University of Agriculture Faculty of Economics.

Zendia, J, Sung,D., 2003. Participation in disaster reduction: eastern south of Asia,. Available on: www.unsider.org/asiapacific/apmeetconf/ap-mc.htm.